|
Post by toni on Nov 29, 2009 10:02:55 GMT -5
I wonder whatever happened regarding the tests she had done (if she'd ever mentioned it or not).
|
|
|
Post by toni on Nov 29, 2009 16:48:59 GMT -5
Thank you.
|
|
|
Post by bannanny on Nov 29, 2009 18:06:34 GMT -5
Wow... I hope we get to hear what those results are gonna be. Good news!
hugs ~~ bannanny
|
|
|
Post by kammy on Nov 30, 2009 16:01:16 GMT -5
That article was written in 2003, it appears that we already know quite a bit of information about acidocalcisome, enough to identify it in the following?: Acidocalcisome en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acidocalcisome"Acidocalcisomes are rounded electron-dense acidic organelles, rich in calcium and polyphosphate and between 100nm and 200nm in diameter. They were discovered in Trypanosomes but have since been found in Toxoplasma gondii, Plasmodium (which cause malaria), Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (an alga), Dictyostelium discoideum (a slime mould), bacteria and human platelets." You can imagine our frustration at times in not having any, zero DNA information on the cells (spheres) that are creating and causing our disease? I believe that they are about to analyze the plant itself, is that correct? It seems that this information should already be out there somewhere, it's confusing? "Today I contacted a well respected retired police officer who has volunteered to have a friend in police forensics analyze the DNA. Slowly but surely. Keep up your hope and faith. We will get the answers we need." What good is this information on the plant DNA unless we know what's inside of us to compare it to? Why aren't they analyzing our cells first? Hopefully, Dr. Wymore is awaiting the test results from the DNA blast that he had recently done on our lesion debris (that's what I understood was being analyzed, I could be wrong?) and will be able to tell if our disease contains acidocalcisomes? It appears that Dr. Wymore is trying to find the DNA match to inform us as to what the pathogen is at the time of release of the blast information, that is very good news?
|
|
|
Post by jeany on Nov 30, 2009 16:48:55 GMT -5
That article was written in 2003, it appears that we already know quite a bit of information about acidocalcisome, enough to identify it in the following?: Acidocalcisome en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acidocalcisome"Acidocalcisomes are rounded electron-dense acidic organelles, rich in calcium and polyphosphate and between 100nm and 200nm in diameter. They were discovered in Trypanosomes but have since been found in Toxoplasma gondii, Plasmodium (which cause malaria), Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (an alga), Dictyostelium discoideum (a slime mould), bacteria and human platelets." You can imagine our frustration at times in not having any, zero DNA information on the cells (spheres) that are creating and causing our disease? I believe that they are about to analyze the plant itself, is that correct? It seems that this information should already be out there somewhere, it's confusing? "Today I contacted a well respected retired police officer who has volunteered to have a friend in police forensics analyze the DNA. Slowly but surely. Keep up your hope and faith. We will get the answers we need." What good is this information on the plant DNA unless we know what's inside of us to compare it to? Why aren't they analyzing our cells first? Hopefully, Dr. Wymore is awaiting the test results from the DNA blast that he had recently done on our lesion debris (that's what I understood was being analyzed, I could be wrong?) and will be able to tell if our disease contains acidocalcisomes? It appears that Dr. Wymore is trying to find the DNA match to inform us as to what the pathogen is at the time of release of the blast information, that is very good news? Acidocalcisomes are novel acidic Ca2+ storage organelles found in trypanosomatids and apicomplexan parasites, abundant in the intracellular stages of these parasites, and characterized by their high electron density, and high content of phosphorus, Ca2+, Mg2+, Na+ and Zn2+.Calcium, Magnesium, Natrium and Zinc...and phosphorus which is in pesticides..hmm..acidic calcium levels causes apatites! Calcium crystals! It is possible to dissolve the obscuring crystals by adjusting the pH.Phosphates can be dissolved by adding a drop or two of 2% acetic acid. Amorphous urates can be dissolved by adding an alkali like a 2% ammonia solution. But heating is by far a preferred method. It is not wise to solve a urate problem by creating a phosphate precipitation. CystinuriaCystine crystals are found in urine of almost exclusively patients with a genetic disease giving an impairment with the tubular reabsorption of the basic aminoacid: lysine, arginine, ornithine and cystine. This disease is called cystinuria. For a few patients with cystinuria, stones will develop. The urolithiasis is highly dependent of the urinary pH and water intake. Cystine is less soluble at a pH lower than 5,0 (saturation 300 mg/l); saturation is of 500 mg/l at a pH of 7,4. InfectionInfection with urea splitting bacteria (ex: proteus species) leads to a production of ammonia an alkalinization of the urine. The produced ammonia generates magnesium ammonium phosphate crystals, also called triple phosphates.
The mineralogical name of triple phosphate is Struvite. Triple phosphates are usually found with amorphous phosphates, owing to their low solubility at alkaline pH. www.agora.crosemont.qc.ca/urinesediments/doceng/doc_024.htmJeany
|
|
|
Post by lilsissy on Nov 30, 2009 20:09:47 GMT -5
Skytrool and i did a lot of research into this, The Acid Calcium Sac , high energy sac was the tap for the energy of Morgellons. This was what was found to be most usefull , must refresh.
Jen
We wrote on that on mark darrahs thread.
|
|