|
Post by grady on Jan 5, 2008 22:11:40 GMT -5
I have spoken with Dr. Staninger and Dr. Kolb both on the phone. Dr. Staninger stated that she has proven that our bodies are creating plasticines (spelling) or in laymans terms a type of platic in our bodies and also tubules (carbon I think, hollow tubes) but I cannot remember for sure if she said carbon, however, she did talk alot about our body creating plastic. Now, when I spoke to Dr. Kolb (she is out of Atlanta and has met with the CDC on this I am told) she stated she doesn't know for sure what this is but strongly suspects bacteria. She asked me if I had been to the beach and dug in the sand? I said yes, we take shovels and build massive sand castles. She stated that so many people that she is treating answer that question the same way it cannot be coincidence. The subject of bacteria, the same kind brewed to eat oil spills came up, she said to avoid plastics, food that comes in plastics and so on. I do not think these two doctors are even aware of each others work frankly. Well, tonight I did some research, look what I found. Bacteria Eating Up Oil Spills and Producing Biodegradable Plastic - And could also offer a new solution for plastic recyclingBacteria are everywhere and are capable of both highly useful and highly disastrous effects. They are also capable of living in the outmost unfavorable conditions. Biotechnologists have long tried to design new types of bacteria capable of digesting pollution or various artificial non-biodegradable products. Now, biologists from the University College Dublin in Ireland have found that a strain of Pseudomonas putida can not only thrive in an environment that most creatures would consider deadly but can also produce useful byproducts. Kevin O'Connor and his colleagues produced a chemical cocktail made up of more than 80 percent styrene oil plus low volumes of other toxicants. Frankly, they haven’t expected that their test bacteria, P. putida CA-3, a special strain of a common soil microbe, would do too well. However, the bacteria managed to turn 64 grams of undistilled styrene oil into nearly 3 grams of additional bacteria. In the process, the bacteria also produced 1.6 grams of a biodegradable plastic called polyhydroxyalkanoates, or PHA. The PHA is already used to make everything from forks to vitamins. We cannot yet say that this bacterium literally changes an environmental problem into a beneficial substance because it also produces some amounts of other toxic byproducts such as toluene. Nevertheless, it is a good start. The chemicals the bacteria likes can be produced from polystyrene through a process called pyrolysis. Thus, they may be useful in recycling plastics. "Due to the general applicability of pyrolysis for plastic conversion to an oil and the large number of microorganisms capable of PHA accumulation from a vast array of molecules, the principle of the process described here can be applied for the recycling of any petrochemical plastic waste," the scientists write.
A bacteria (found not created) that comes from the soil can turn chemicals into plastic, well I'll be darned, who'd a thought, any takers ... Honestly, I really thing this is adding up ... I know there is a fungal component, but perhaps it's because our skin is riddled with holes and such from the plastic fibers that are being produced, the fibers are the result of the bacterial process going on in our bodies, the fungal spores get in there only because of these perfurations in our skin. Please excuse the egotistical title
|
|
|
Post by grady on Jan 5, 2008 22:20:37 GMT -5
Futher more, The article talks of Toluene as a toxic by product when the bacteria creates plastics from as the article states "a vast array of molecules" (which I am sure can be found in our bodies) it creates Toluene, this seems VERY SIMILAR to the goop folks talk about, I remember just the other day someone talking about this clear stickly liquid, guys, this is our baby, I know this is it. Look what it says about Toluene en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TolueneToluene may enter the human system not only through vapour inhalation from the liquid evaporation, but also following soil contamination events, where human contact with soil, ingestion of contaminated groundwater or soil vapour off-gassing can occur.The toxicity of toluene can be explained mostly by its metabolism. As toluene has very low water solubility, it cannot exit the body via the normal routes (urine, feces, or sweat).[citation needed] It must be metabolized in order to be excreted. The methyl group of toluene is more easily oxidized by cytochrome P450 than the benzene ring. Therefore, in the metabolism of toluene, 95% is oxidized to become benzyl alcohol.[4] The toxic metabolites are created by the remaining 5% that are oxidized to benzaldehyde and cresols.[5][6] Most of the reactive products are detoxified by conjugation to glutathione but the remainder may severely damage cells.[7]
|
|
|
Post by grady on Jan 5, 2008 22:34:05 GMT -5
I'll continue. I've always rejected the plastic theory and always wondered about these so called "fibers" that won't burn. I've seen them under my skin like a mesh (not so bad now) and wondered how I could live with this stuff all throughout my body? If it would never break down or degrade how could I continue and like this and not die?
Well, the article states that the plastic is "biodegradable plastic called polyhydroxyalkanoates" and breaks down in about 55 days.
This is all clicking folks, CLICK, CLICK, CLICK.
Let me summarize:
1) Something akin to "Pseudomonas putida" has gotten into our systems. 2) It is producing plastic fibers and tubules as a by product of its life process 3) It is also producting "toluene" which we need to get rid of via "glutathione " (more on that in a follow up post tomorrow) 4) No doubt, the toxins given off by any bacteria can make one feel ill by increasing the toxic burden on the body and toluene is not the only toxic by product I'm sure. 5) The plastic fibers (others have had hard chunks of plastic come right out of thier skin and lips) purferate the skin making for perfect little entry points for fungal spores
It could be this soil bacteria is even attractive to bugs/worms, who knows, kill the bacteria, slay the beast. Perhaps that is why anti-biotics are working so well for some, we just need the right killer.
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Jan 6, 2008 1:52:05 GMT -5
Grady, I believe that toulene is in chemtrails also. So check out polyonucleotides, artificial DNA. Going into detail over here: tinyurl.com/3ytgnrmorgellonsgroup.proboards23.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=nanodiscuss&thread=1199169704&page=1 Then check out "cold fusion" and the Sigma Aldrich Dendrimers Will put that link back up. Skytroll
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Jan 6, 2008 2:16:13 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Jan 6, 2008 2:35:12 GMT -5
You got me going Grady...
Skytroll
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Jan 6, 2008 2:49:22 GMT -5
Biocers: iocers: ceramics with incorporated microorganisms for biocatalytic, biosorptive and functional materials development Horst Böttcher, Ulrich Soltmann, Michael Mertig and Wolfgang Pompe Biologically modified ceramics (biocers) are understood as a class of nanocomposites which combine biocomponents with ceramic-like matrices. Biocers containing biocomponents can be prepared as a bulk material or as coatings by sol–gel and freeze-cast techniques from inorganic nanosols or by special CVD methods. By avoiding critical preparation conditions (high temperature, organic solvents) which would lead to denaturation, even bacteria, fungi, and yeast cells can be incorporated while maintaining their viability (living ceramics). In this article the preparation and structure of such biocers and their applicative potential for biocatalytic, biosorptive and structure-forming processes will be discussed. Graphical abstract image for this article (ID: b401724b) www.rsc.org/publishing/journals/JM/article.asp?doi=b401724bskytroll
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Jan 6, 2008 2:50:23 GMT -5
Ceramics or Plastics?
Both use silica?
Skytroll
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Jan 6, 2008 2:52:45 GMT -5
Biopalladium: Biocer Based on the Biopalladium technology, developed by Ghent University (LabMET, tom.hennebel@ugent.be), a novel formulation of an effective palladium catalyst is developed as a better alternative to activated carbon adsorption or catalysis on iron: BIOCER. Biocer The palladium is “made” by bacteria, and further mixed into a polymer in order to obtain small beads which are active for dechlorination of VOCls and other recalcitrant halogenated organics. This is BIOCER. BIOCER was succesfully tested against the following contaminants in water at ambient temperature: * Polychlorobiphenyls (PCBs) * Lindane * Polybromobiphenyls and polybromodiphenylethers (PBBs and PBDEs) * Trichloroethane (TCA) * Trichloroethene (TRI) * Perchlorate * Ethynylestradiol (EE2) * … The BIOCER catalytic beads can be varied in size, are up to several millimetres large, and are readily applicable in upstream bed reactors, for example for above-ground groundwater treatment. These beads have physical properties very similar to ‘rubber’, are porous and sediment in water. The advantages that BIOCER has to activated carbon are that much less product needs to be used in any reactor technology, especially for molecules that are sterically hindering adsorption. Iron as a catalyst often gives rise to unwanted “side-products”, that don’t appear with BIOCER technology. www.avecom.be/easycms/Biocerskytroll
|
|
|
Post by grady on Jan 6, 2008 10:39:28 GMT -5
These beads have physical properties very similar to rubber
Kind of reminds me of those white rubbery nematode shapped things we find all over
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Jan 6, 2008 10:55:57 GMT -5
Grady,
I think we are getting closer, would explain the bacteria, fungus etc. wouldn't it?
This stuff I am pulling out of that former baseball size cyst I had, has large piecs of material, that act like rubber.
This stuff can turn to rubber, and flowing silicon.
This can change our DNA. And if we are limping already with being a carrier of other diseases, we are in for some rude awakenings.
I believe the formation of plastics, was the problem years ago.
That is what polymer which can only be burned at 1400 degrees?
I think the white floaters are the seeds in the floating fungal spores, from algae, from fungus itself, yet this is in the dendrimers. The dendrimers evidently can change the helix.
Why would Crick=Watson base pairs be involved in the construction of this?
Palladium is a soft metal, What do we know about the Kyoto Protocol? Who hasn't signed it?
Kyoto has a lot to do with the buckyballs. Maybe a comparison between Oppenheimer and Teller needs to be brought out into the open.
So much involved in this, yet someone is running the show, in all of this. How much power does the UN have? What do NGO's do? The are supposed to be Non governmental Organizations, who pays their salaries? The infiltrate small communities. They are Marxist, which seems to be alive and well in all places.......England.
Check out the Royal Society, who sent Darwin in the first place? Who was involved with Crick/Watson and Rosalind Franklin? Who funded their project?
Now how did the UN get involved with global warming scheme? Was Teller their answer?
Is aerosol operations, chemtrails, the answer? Teller seemed to think so. But, what did Oppenheimer think?
Tomalia who is with the Dendrimers building block scenario, was involved in the first buckyballs. Nanos which have electrical components, most likely through the palladium that is used in the denrons and dendrimers, Dendrimers and dendrytes(which are in our skin nerves and nerves and muscles) provide the Holliday junctions for these to be incorporated into our DNA.
More on this later, but would like to follow your 4 points, if I may.
Skytroll
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Jan 6, 2008 11:22:02 GMT -5
Does anyone remember the connection to iron? We are at the iron and clay stage of Daniel's dream, are we not? But, was it created? Are we ignoring the omens, or is man actually making the omen come true? A sort of forced omen, a forced directed goal of making this happen? I think so. That would be the evolution of matter. Right down to molecules. Well, humans have molecules, don't we? Found this last night Grady, wonder if Congress is already onto this? Of course, but they won't tell us unless we look! commdocs.house.gov/committees/science/hsy24464.000/hsy24464_0.HTMThis is the Molecular Institute and Tomalia is involved Dow and others: tinyurl.com/ypcx5omembership.acs.org/m/midl/committees/fsm/fsm07/FSM%202007%20Online%20Program.pdf Skytroll
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Jan 6, 2008 11:33:31 GMT -5
Scroll to page 10 on polymer morphology in food packaging. Seems to be a problem? tinyurl.com/ypcx5oPAMAM dendrimers and PLASTIZERs mentioned on Page 17. Skytroll Skytroll
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Jan 6, 2008 11:35:45 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Jan 6, 2008 11:38:57 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Jan 6, 2008 11:45:38 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by suebe on Jan 6, 2008 12:29:26 GMT -5
Hey Grady, Very good theory indeed, ans Skytroll you just blow me away with the stuff you find. Here is a picture of the blue ribbon fiber. I used to get this stuff coming out of me like crazy. I wondered even if something had been left in my body during surgery, how else could I be so full of this stuff, even found it all over floors and counters, where ever I went, I shed it.
|
|
|
Post by suebe on Jan 6, 2008 14:14:00 GMT -5
Ops forgot to say the blue ribbon ones always feel like plastic.
|
|
|
Post by toni on Jan 6, 2008 15:26:12 GMT -5
Oh Sue, they keep getting stranger. I've never seen anything like that before. Thank you for posting that. What could you compare the size of that to? Thanks.
|
|
|
Post by robertalouise26 on Jan 6, 2008 16:28:01 GMT -5
Dearest Toni how can I get to read grady's Brilliant theory. I hope all is well with you. Much love. Roberta.
|
|