|
Post by skytroll on Mar 24, 2010 0:29:22 GMT -5
what causes the quorum sensing in the first place? What is the signal? specific signal? Mechanism Bacteria that use quorum sensing constantly produce and secrete certain signaling molecules (called autoinducers or pheromones). These bacteria also have a receptor that can specifically detect the signaling molecule (inducer). When the inducer binds the receptor, it activates transcription of certain genes, including those for inducer synthesis. There is a low likelihood of a bacterium detecting its own secreted inducer. Thus, in order for gene transcription to be activated, the cell must encounter signaling molecules secreted by other cells in its environment. When only a few other bacteria of the same kind are in the vicinity, diffusion reduces the concentration of the inducer in the surrounding medium to almost zero, so the bacteria produce little inducer. However, as the population grows the concentration of the inducer passes a threshold, causing more inducer to be synthesized. This forms a positive feedback loop, and the receptor becomes fully activated. Activation of the receptor induces the up regulation of other specific genes, causing all of the cells to begin transcription at approximately the same time. This coordinated behavior of bacterial cells can be useful in a variety of situations. For instance, the bioluminescent luciferase produced by V. fischeri would not be visible if it was produced by a single cell. By using quorum sensing to limit the production of luciferase to situations when cell populations are large, V. fischeri cells are able to avoid wasting energy on the production of useless product. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quorum_sensingautoinducers or pheromones messing with bacteria quorum sensing; mmbr.asm.org/cgi/content/full/70/4/859skytroll
|
|
|
Post by kammy on Mar 25, 2010 7:23:54 GMT -5
Kammy, and all you smart people - thanks so much for doing the work that should have been done by those entrusted with "protecting our health". I was writing the book that is now available for free at judithnd.com and I will be updating it with a link to these blog pages because you have all nailed it. I don't think it will be anytime soon, even if you guys did all the work for them, that the powers that be will do anything about this. Also, since I own the e-book if any of you have additional information you want me to add to it as an afterward 1- 2- 3- or put some links up on my site I welcome your contributions. Further, I have contacted Larry King, Oprah, The View, CNN, Mike Moore and there will be recognition as it will get into somebody's hands that is going to bring this to the forefront again. I was on Dr Phil long ago and I will get on somewhere again. You will not be doing all this work for nothing - please do not feel that way. You are all part of the tapestry that forms the whole picture every thread and weave makes it come together. Those who have been on this site for a long time know I was on here awhile back - my mom got cancer for the third time at the age of 85 last year and I stopped most of my online blogs, reading posting etc... she is now 86 and though the cancer is not back yet she is slowly going down mentally so I have responsibility at home but I will do all I can to push this book and thus bring greater awareness to all of your efforts. That is why I did this. Any of you can contact me at judithnd(capital 2)judithnd.com with additional information related to this posting - topic. I think the big corporate guys will keep this under cover as long as they can but I am going to do all I can to expose this mess to the world. We have been had. This stuff has destroyed the entire ecosystem and it is only a matter of time before hundreds of thousands more will be wondering "why are these sores not healing?" That is why I am determined to get this book out there - I want them to know the truth. To get better, if you read the book, you will learn this: MOST IMPORTANT first steps DO NOT GO AFTER TREATING THE SKIN BEFORE YOU ARE ATTACKING IT INTERNALLY you will just drive it deeper if you go after it externally. I had the gel form lumps all over my body and as I continued to study I learned that I could dissolve biofilms, (and this gel) with special enzymes. Once I got on it (you'll love this) my sores got way worse, I had blisters form on my fingers and organisms came out like crazy - as did the fibers and capsids - I got very fatigued. This is what it takes to get rid of this crap. The enzymes broke open the "safe houses" of the organisms and they came out of me like crazy. It is not fun but that is what must happen. Lyme is exactly the same - you have to get rid of the biofilms so that you can get at the various organims. At the same time I was then using the professional detoxification products offer by DNR Inc. It is explained in the back of the book. No one gets better until they destroy the biofilm - I tell you how - then you kill the various pathogens and get rid of the toxins - then you can enjoy a better life. Cured??? If you can do this within 2-3 years of exposure I would say yes - but if you have had it as long as I have (12-15 yrs) it is deep in all my tissues, spine, bones, lungs... so I am still working on it but I do have a better quality of life than I had before doing this. For external skin and household the best product is Best Yet from CedarCide - red cedar essential oil is in it. Great stuff for PETS - clears them up fast! Biofilm product can be used internally for pets too. Then, today as I walked around my yard I found huge piles of fungus that had been under a snow pile and I know it is this stuff. So this summer when I mow the grass I will breathe that all in again. I am not sure there will be any escape if one breathes and uses water. It is in the well water at my place. How do I know this: I have seen hundreds of times the instant self-assembly of the fibers in my sink or tub and so I thought they were coming from my skin cells, as I shed this stuff. But, I also have a cottage that I rent out to others and had not been in it for a long time and before the guy moved in it had been completely remodeled - new sinks, new walls mostly gutted and redone - well to make a long story short - I had to clean it up when he moved out and I had not been in it for even 1 minute before I began cleaning the bathroom sink - what formed instantly - you guessed it - the fibers - they are from the water (the same well water is in my house as the cottage) - they are not only forming from me - they are forming from the water. So we are screwed! This crap has gotten into the ground water and nobody is aware of what is going on. Read the book - make sure to share it - get it into newsletters - we have to warn the public what a nightmare this is. Thanks everyone - you all rock! Judy TY, Judy - yes, I read your e-book the other night, I highly recommend it and appreciate the work you have done to help us gain further knowledge of Morgellons Disease. We are all simply the pioneers whacking the path with machetes trying to forge a path for the more experienced to come in behind us, I wish they'd hurry up and get here, don't you? I have a link to the molecular biology aspect of Morgellons that Sky and I are currently working on, that is running parallel to this thread - we're hoping that someone with this molecular biology background will take a look at our preliminaries? It is at: www.morgboard.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=503&page=1I remain optimistic here in the light of all that I am finding, I believe that even if our pathogens are not completely organic, they can still be broken down as inorganic compounds because they have incorporated the organic into them. I also believe as you do, Judity, that the first step is most likely in eliminating the biofilm, that if we can break it up to allow the medicines to get in to do their job on the 'others', then we can overcome this illness and possibly live a better quality of life and be somewhat or completely symptom-free. See my next post...
|
|
|
Post by kammy on Mar 25, 2010 7:40:07 GMT -5
There is much more to this then just the fungi, Kammy. How does this get into the human body? What is the delivery system? Has this fungus been found on the human body? How does it relate to chlamydia? What is the submicron particle? How do erthrocytes fit in here? I think we have to take this further yet, bannany just found from her report Feather particles, which tam tam mentioned at one time, spiders and webs found around home smuts and myxomycetes, agro is rhizobiums. going to root of plant, and seed. plant parts textile parts gell shards. Quorum sensing has to be in the carbon ball itself, made most likely of more than carbon magnetic like fullerene used in buckyballs, remember these are very small. and they can carry dna. Metalloproteins. Yet they can react to both candida yeasts teliospores from smut and rust. candida is like conidia and basidiomycetes. There is the heat shock proteins that are making certain genetic types very ill. The new artficial cell, includes a natural clathrin coat, or an inorganic one made of iron, fullerenes, magnetic, and that is in the carbon buckyball. forms the cage also in nanotubes. This was all part of a DOE project where microbes were created to eat up stuff in the environment. Part of the aerosol operations. What we have cannot be cultivated because of the Archeae in the construction that involves thermomycota, rhodopsin, and other thermophiles. This crosses the bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotics which involve man and yeast and fungi is closest to genes in man. I think we are looking at yeast, this is what forms the chlamydia forms. This yeast is close to smut and rust diseases. What are the spores seed that makes up this chlamydia? It is related to candida yeast, the 6 that form chlamydia and the yeast artificial chromosome. These have the power to change our histones adding a 5th histone. or more. Smut and rust teliospores are very close to the forms. ====================== Origins and inheritance of chromosome-length polymorphisms in the ... by DA Gaudet - 1998 - Cited by 8 - Related articles (teliospore line 1279). Polymorphisms for chromosome IV were observed in the 1600–1900-kb ...... insertions within telomeres contribute to chromosome-size ... www.springerlink.com/index/TDY4VYFR0FJAEU2B.pdfoff google compare telomeres in human body to teliospores in uridinales. Hang in there, we are not there yet. we need proof. specimens, not photos. We need to know how and why the genetists decided to reconstruct the cytoskeleton system. Homologenous genes substituting for human genes. ................ purposely..................... skytroll Good questions, Sky. I do not claim to understand the entire workings of the Morgellons Disease system, this is something to be eventually left to a scientist with the proper equipment/knowledge... here is an example of my very first diagram to demonstrate (as a suggestion only) on how Morgellons is a layered matrix or a nested array of pathogens, pathogens symbiotic within each other. This diagram was drawn prior to the discovery of the most likely ID of the fungal genus involved!!! This diagram represents the Chlamydia aspect... BF = MA <-+ PA <-+ CL <-+ SN "We see that S. negevensis (SN) can live inside of free-living amoebae such as Polyphaga acanthamoeba (PA). So, we have various intracellular microorganisms, S. negevensis, as an example can be inside of the chlamydia (CL) 'sphere', which all can live inside of an amoeba / "blob". P. acanthamoebae (PA) was shown to survive and replicate within human macrophages (MA). I believe we are seeing macrophages (photos later) in our specimens..." ParaChlamydiae - A Re-Cap I believe I just uncovered some very interesting information over the past few Parachlamydia posts, I wanted to bring out the highlights into one post in laymen's terms so that we can possibly use this information to help us better understand what is most likely happening. Please feel free to help me look, this is a vast subject: Chlamydia is a bacterial sphere which HOLDS 'others', such as Simkania negevensis, etc. which are also called "chlamydia-like intracellular microorganisms", it appears that this genus is ever-evolving and new discoveries are being made. That, as of 2009, new tools were being developed for the diagnosis of parachlamydial infections, that prior to then it was stated in 2002, there were no diagnostic tests for this type of infection, as per the PubMed articles above. We should be asking to be tested for and seek out diagnostic labs and doctors that can test for parachlamydial infections.It's possible that some of our 'blob' and other images are what are known as "free living amoeba", which I'm looking at and seem possible, will post later. We see that S. negevensis (SN) can live inside of free-living amoebae such as Polyphaga acanthamoeba (PA). So, we have various intracellular microorganisms, S. negevensis, as an example can be inside of the chlamydia (CL) 'sphere', which all can live inside of an amoeba / "blob". P. acanthamoebae (PA) was shown to survive and replicate within human macrophages (MA). I believe we are seeing macrophages (photos later) in our specimens... We also know that our disease is producing a biofilm (BF) which is probably another protective coating for these organisms. S. negevensis can be inside of Chlamydia which both can live inside of P. acanthamoebae which can be inside of human macrophages, all covered in a biofilm. I believe this is a good example of what is happening inside of Morgellons with the complexity being the addition of more organisms and nested variables. Morgellons appears to be a certain nested matrix of specific organisms that we all have in common with the addition of 'others', in some, to cause different symptoms.I'm thinking that the key is that we have to kill our pathogens in layers with the outside layer being attacked first? I have noted from photographs that the biofilm (BF) appears to be the 'womb' from which anything can be seen inside of. The algae/fungus/bacteria/amoeba byproducts produce or = BF BF = MA <-+ PA <-+ CL <-+ SN So, if the CL is creating the BF, it is nested inside of the MA and PA layers. Let us hope that the BF is being created by the fungal/algae or amoebae element? We know that some have had success in removing the biofilm aspect. It might help to know if Chlamydia or P. acanthamoebae are known to produce a biofilm? The Chlamydia-like, Chytrid and our fungal spores ALL LOOK ALIKE initially in appearance but are preforming and reproducing differently to indicate that they are different from each other. I need to make a video library of the 'spheres' so that you can see the similarities and differences for reference purposes. (To make it more interesting: Jeany thinks the amoeba is the outside layer where the biofilm is, and she might be correct, we just don't know yet, we haven't delved into this aspect. This is basic diagram number 1 above - we'll end up with 100 before it's over before we get the true picture of what we're looking at.) Where "CL" is in the above diagram, there could be: "CL", Chytrid, or "Our Fungal Genus" and most likely a combination of these. These are just presently believed to be there from our research - not to mention our other discoveries which are not in the diagram, nor the factors we can't see at 100x! As an example - ADD the other fungal pathogens that are being found by Dr. Abbott's lab.
|
|
|
Post by jeany on Mar 25, 2010 12:28:17 GMT -5
I believe this is what happened in nature and for us to become infected by animal- and plant pathogens: Cryptic pathogenesisAn alternative explanation for virulence in microbes acquired from the environment is cryptic pathogenesis, whereby such microbes have animal hosts that are yet to be discovered. In such a scenario, some fraction of the microbial population is always cycling through an animal host, and consequently, attributes for persisting in animal hosts are maintained through selection. The finding that land and marine mammals in areas where Coccidioides immitis is endemic are sometimes found to be infected with this fungus is consistent with a cryptic-pathogenesis explanation. Although the possibility of cryptic pathogenesis cannot be excluded for any environmentally acquired microbe, since this would involve proving a negative, there is experimental evidence against an absolute need for animal passage in the maintenance of virulence. Avirulent strains of C. neoformans and H. capsulatum can be restored to virulence through passage in the amoeboid hosts Dictyostelium and Acanthamoeba castellanii, respectivelyec.asm.org/cgi/content/full/6/12/2169?maxtoshow=&HITS=10&hits=10&RESULTFORMAT=&fulltext=bacteria&searchid=1&FIRSTINDEX=2670&sortspec=date&resourcetype=HWFIGJeany
|
|
|
Post by kammy on Mar 26, 2010 2:54:03 GMT -5
The Morgellons Spheres Here's a You-Tube movie that put together late last night to show our various spores: www.youtube.com/watch?v=nKyjrHZqggkI asked for biology help again to identify our spores, if you know anyone that might be able to identify anything seen in this video, send them the link and see what they say? "Avirulent strains of C. neoformans and H. capsulatum can be restored to virulence through passage in the amoeboid hosts Dictyostelium and Acanthamoeba castellanii, respectively." I need to look closer at H. capsulatum... Crytic pathogensis - that's probably what's happened... wtg, Jeany!
|
|
|
Post by kammy on Mar 26, 2010 5:47:43 GMT -5
We don't have any indication that Morgellons Disease was deliberately set upon us, we can start a conspiracy thread over in the Theories section?
So far, with our limited resources - we're seeing that Morgellons is an extension of cancer, a benign pseudo-cancer, giant cell granuloma, that is why when we are tested our results show 'atypical cells' or 'giant cell involvement' and not necessarily cancer. These cancer-causing organisms have been around for years - but, not in our existing form. Morgellons is a mistake that even the scientists creating their individual parts of our disease could not predict as Jeany's last post explains - cryptic (hidden) pathogenosis from inert pathogens coming alive from global warming, ice melting, ships passing the pathogens around the world from their bilge waters... etc., bringing together amoeba and fungi that have been asleep, when put together become awake, etc. So far, that's what we're seeing, the unpredictable has happened.
Why would any Government want to mind control a large segment of the population by re-wiring them to control them when they are riddled with disease, consumed by their illness, are showing the signs of bi-polar, ADD... and the list goes on... on the negative side of the ledger book - what advantage is a sick army? Every good military man knows that it takes at least three able men to take care of one injured one. We are a liability to our Government, not an asset, IMO we represent a combination of several lab mistakes intertwined with the existing natural world of pathogens.
|
|
|
Post by kammy on Mar 26, 2010 8:08:39 GMT -5
From Sammy's "Cancer Parasite" thread: Progenitor cryptocides THE RUSSELL BODY: THE FORGOTTEN CLUE TO THE BACTERIAL CAUSE OF CANCER www.joimr.org/phorum/read.php?f=2&i=50&t=50"There are many different kinds of bacteria but only one type that has been consistently observed and studied in cancer for over a century. The cancer microbe has many forms, some of which appear as ordinary staphylococci or larger yeast-like forms that further enlarge to the size of Russell bodies. As mentioned, some Russell bodies enlarge to truly gigantic proportions, one hundred times the diameter of small cocci. One can liken this growth potential to an empty balloon that is then blown up to full-size. In addition, the microbe has exceedingly small filterable submicroscopic forms approaching the size of viruses, visible only by use of the electron microscope. The mystery of these “yeast-like” bodies deep in his skin was solved years later when I first learned about the existence of “large body” forms of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. When this patient died, Mycobacterium fortuitum, an “atypical” form of mycobacteria was cultured from his scleroderma tissue. In 1981 King and Eisenberg’s article on “Russell’s fuchsin body: ‘The characteristic organism of cancer’ ” appeared in the American Journal of Dermatopathology. They reconfirmed that “Russell bodies have now been shown to be immunoglobulins.” They remarked that Russell was not the first to describe them; and that similar bodies were reported by Cornil and Alvarez in rhinoscleroma five years earlier in a French journal in 1885."
|
|
|
Post by kammy on Mar 26, 2010 8:53:01 GMT -5
Freaky is about to see her doctor who is Infectious Diseases, I believe? I'm in the process of finding out her specialty and Freaky asked me which sites she should refer the doctor to? I think the morgellons.org/case_definition.htm site has the best, compact information for a doctor? Freaky, you can cut and paste this below or if folks have a suggested revision?... Dear Dr. Salvato, Morgellons Disease is poorly understood at this time, one of our best resources is the morgellons.org/case_definition.htm page written by a Medical Board to inform doctors of the Case History studies of several Morgellons patients that were evaluated. In this researcher's opinion, it appears that Morgellons disease is strongly related to a systemic fungal/bacterial infection related to the Mycorrhizal genus. This fungus is not being found in traditional lab testing because these fungi are used in fertilizers and food fermentation processing and are generally regarded as safe. The Morgellons patient needs a referral to a Mycologist. We have got to find the specialist that can "see" our disease, seeing where Jeany thinks the nanobacterial aspect is strongly involved and not easily seen without a special test, my addition to the above post for your physician. Yes, sweetie, we're all sick, just some of us more than others. For instance, when I did Dr. Abbotts lab test - I show no (known) fungi - and, everyone else has these extras.... this tells me that everyone else is probably a little more sicker than I am... ? And, if you have 3 extras... oh boy!... but, I'm thinking, that some of the fungi are 'eating' the others so maybe that's why it not killing us quicker? (it is known that bacteria and fungi feed on each other). No wonder you don't feel good. Our blood is also infected, a blood doctor, hematologist - specialist might be able to see this also, ... also, this is a 'giant cell' disease - a cancer doctor, oncologist?... we need doctors that can test for nanobacteria also called the nanobacTEST by a heart doctor, cardiologist. My recommendation to your 'regular' doctor now reads like this, cut and paste this below to give to your doctor: Dear Dr. Salvato, Morgellons Disease is poorly understood at this time, one of our best resources is the morgellons.org/case_definition.htm page written by a Medical Board to inform doctors of the Case History studies of several Morgellons patients that were evaluated. In this researcher's opinion, it appears that Morgellons disease is strongly related to a systemic fungal/bacterial infection related to the Mycorrhizal genus and inclusive of other cyptic pathogens. This fungus is not being found in traditional lab testing because it is used in fertilizers and food fermentation processing and are generally regarded as safe along with newly developed pathogens from environmental factors from modern-day chemical technologies. The Morgellons patient needs a referral to a Mycologist, Hematologist, Cardiologist, or Oncologist that is especially able to run blood tests on molecular compounds in the above mentioned and we are suspecting the special test for nanobacteria called the nanobacTEST. Also, 92% are showing Chlamydia pneumonia, we believe that there are many other species of the ParaChlamydia genus involved and need a specialist who can access this new lab testing technology for detecting them. All indicators are pointing toward giant cell involvement and related diseases in all cases.
|
|
|
Post by kammy on Mar 26, 2010 15:58:54 GMT -5
Histoplasma capsulatum Ok, Jeany we already know that we can closely implicate H. capsulatum that's more verification along with the "Dicty", as per Jan Smith's research, to show that this cryptic pathogenesis has most likely happened. Histoplasma capsulatum looks like everybody else named recently in its early development stages, except - we can see one stock photo in particular that gives us a good clue that this guy is most likely involved with some of us? This photo shows what it looks like in a more mature, budding state of development from Dr. Fungus: www.doctorfungus.org/Mycoses/human/histo/histoplamosis_c.htmHuman lesion, 22 days growth in nutrient agar @ 300x, the outside edge of a giant sphere showing the same type indentations as above: Fibrosing Mediastinitis - Rare form that produces an intense deposition of fibrotic tissue in the mediastinum encroaching vital structures such as the superior vena cava, esophagus and trachea.
|
|
|
Post by kammy on Mar 28, 2010 5:24:59 GMT -5
Ok, I think I understand what's happened... I need all researchers with time to help me look into this? Below is a post I made on another site in the hopes that some scientist comes along shortly to help us, this post was to document what is currently believed to be happening from my research. I was thinking about what I said in this post that let me know what has happened and also the last post that Jo made here - I asked, 'why would they want to create the pest insect, the insect you do not want - and put them inside of the baculovirus and then put them out in nature?' I now think I understand what has happened.... Quote=Kammy "I made two You-Tube movies showing the Life Cycle of Morgellons... www.youtube.com/watch?v=ikR4ZUd_HZAwww.youtube.com/watch?v=cQGwboUzRwoI chose the 'carbon ball' as the beginning of the life cycle because, it ends up coming out of the organisms as frass and starts the whole process all over again. They are producing the frass/fibers while they are in their larvae stages and when they become adults, the only explanation is that if a gnat (the nematodes are also seen inside the gnat larvae, and appear to replicating via this 'carbon ball' technology independent of the gnat, also) is created from a 'bucky ball' - a baculoviral aspect has to be involved? [/img][/center] Look at this Life Cycle closer, it scares the beezus out of me. Even if the gnat larvae doesn't make it to adulthood, it is still defecating the carbon balls while it is going through its instars. Any water that the gnat touches becomes contaminated with the 'Morg' pathogens. I have photographed another organism that resembles a tomato hornworm in its larval stage, I'm thinking it is actually the fungus gnat larvae also. Some of the others are showing signs of Schistosoma mansoni involved in their disease. And, then others will say they have seen or have other organisms... what all is actually involved, is inconclusive at this time or even if these are real or "expressions" (the DNA of one thing expressed to simply hold or house another), such as the 'shell' aspect. The fungus gnat and nematode are real - in that they are the end products of the other's "expressions", as in a baculoviral expression. AND... we're not just talking about just the gnat and nematode here, as we're looking closer we're seeing most all of the insects and animals are affected in some way or another, their pathogens are matching ours - the koala, frog, bees - their mites, bats, snakes, our natural body mites?... etc., etc. - I'm saying that I believe Morgellons started with the fungus gnat being manipulated because it appears to be the end product, the nematode and others are along for the ride or were present or acquired after the fact and were incorporated into the 'system'. Another possibility is that there are two or more strains of Morgellons in which one contains the Schistosoma mansoni or expression thereof and the other one does not? Or, this Schistosoma factor or expression is hidden and not known until many years into the disease and is present in all?"
|
|
|
Post by kammy on Mar 28, 2010 6:30:50 GMT -5
As you can see from my statement above, I have placed the nematode in the second position of importance inside our disease and it is but it isn't, I'll explain: Steinernema Nematodes in Urine This is a sample of a piece of 'skin-looking' material that was found in the toilet bowl after urinating. It was lifted out and placed on a slide. The toilet bowl is cleaned on a very regular basis with disinfectants, further tests on the water are in order. However, it is very evident that the piece of 'skin-looking' material is 'Morg-like' in appearance, that this piece of material turned into the gray/black fungus in two days left undisturbed between the two slides: Urine material between two slides at 100x, the line in the photograph above the nematode represents the edge of the water/urine: Urine material at 300x: We can also see that the nematode is defecating the 'carbon balls': Urine material at 600x, these are more inside of the fungus material indicating that this is the home of the nematode and not the toilet bowl water: I believe one of the other people here have said that they are seeing an organism in their urine, do we have a good photo of their organism yet?
|
|
|
Post by kammy on Mar 28, 2010 7:04:41 GMT -5
The Initial Cause of Morgellons Disease What have we been talking about here? We've been discussing the organisms that appear to be 'trapped' inside of a baculoviral system that are somehow a part of our disease. How are they are seemingly formed from our particles, crystals, specks, spores, etc.? We haven't been sure exactly, that's why this thread was created - to find out. Why do we believe this technology is possible? From what is written about how the baculovirus operates, what we're seeing is the closest known description in science. What has been said about what is happening?: We believe that our organisms are the result of "GM magic" or what is known as an "expression" probably originally found in the form of a powder, crystal granular, or aerosol... that the magic of a powder can create something that is eventually alive. As an example, we know that there are powders used as biopesticides that create beneficial nematodes. The farmer puts the powder grains on his field, the sun and water eventually create a benefical nematode that helps eliminate pests and fungi that harm the crop. That - whatever this 'powder' is - is now inside the fungus gnat, it is appearing to be inside most of all living creations - and in man, it is manifesting itself as Morgellons Disease. That the fungus gnat is now able to create new life by the process of however this powder works. That by the fungus gnat being able to fly and move from water source to water source, has caused the quickened spread of our disease. The nematode is now believed to be inside the fungus gnat and man. That the agents used are like vacuum cells that absorb any other pathogens that enter and incorporates them into this system. That the key in discovery to what is at the foundation of our disease is looking into these particular 'beneficial nematode' biopesticides.
|
|
|
Post by jeany on Mar 28, 2010 8:22:39 GMT -5
To start with, this picture shows the infectious cycle of bio-pesticides containing the 'beneficial' nematodes implicated in the baculovirus/bt system: Note: Steinernematidae - Heterorhabditidae As Kammy stated above these two nematodes have a strong resemblance with what was seen in the urine samples. Jeany
|
|
|
Post by jeany on Mar 28, 2010 8:34:04 GMT -5
To compare: Urine material between two slides at 100x SteinernematidaeNote: the vesicle containing bacteria inside the nematode: xenorhabdus nematophila Jeany
|
|
|
Post by jeany on Mar 28, 2010 8:40:43 GMT -5
Green fluorescent protein-labeled Xenorhabdus nematophila bacteria: ....green fluorescent protein-labeled Xenorhabdus nematophila bacteria being released from the intestine of an infective juvenile-stage Steinernema carpocapse nematode. The nematode sheds bacteria by defecation in response to infecting an insect host. As seen in this image, released bacteria collect in a loose outer membrane that surrounds the nematode. jb.asm.org/content/vol185/issue10/cover.dtlAccording to the pictures of the urine samples you can clearly see the 'carbon balls' embedded in the nematode which it is about to defecate. Perhaps we should take a closer look in order to see if they glow? Jeany
|
|
|
Post by jeany on Mar 28, 2010 9:24:45 GMT -5
As I was looking deeper in to this subject I believe to have found the 'nano aspect' of our disease. Hydrogel (also called nanogel, solgel, aerogel) is used to encapsulated the nematodes in the baculoviral system as a 'protective' layer. btw..in case you don't know, Hydrogel is also used as a fuel additive in military aircrafts which could be the connection to chemtrails as well to outbreaks of Morgellons Disease, meaning people living near Military bases. I'm thinking that might be the reason why the investigation of our disease was given over to the Armed Forces? Here is the US patent: Production of hydrogel encapsulated nematodes United States Patent 4753799 - Plant Genetics, Inc. (Davis, CA) www.freepatentsonline.com/4753799.htmlThe present invention relates generally to the use of nematodes as insecticides, and more particularly to immobilizing and preserving nematodes in hydrogel capsules for delivery to insect hosts, and to hydrogel capsules containing nematodes.
Living insecticide agents, when delivered under controlled conditions, have narrow host ranges and can control the spread of specific hosts, without affecting natural predators or beneficial insects. Examples of such agents, termed bio-rational insecticides, include Bacillus thuringiensis; Baculoviridae, such as Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus; and various fungal pathogens, among others.Various hydrogel agents can be employed to provide an appropriate encapsulation matrix for the insecticidal compositions produced in accordance with the present invention. In general, a hydrogel capsule should allow nematode respiration by permitting diffusion of gases. The hydrogel agent selected should provide a capsule strong enough to resist external abrasion and adverse forces, yet be pliable enough to allow the eventual release of the nematode or ingestion by the insect at the appropriate time. In order to fulfill these objectives, it may be desirable in certain embodiments to use various gels in combination, either as a mixture or in layers, to achieve the desired results. Please note the other Hydrogels used: I. Natural Polymers A. Ionic bonds (requires complexing agents) Alginate with Polypectate Sodium Pectate Furcellaran Pectin Hypnean Dextran Tamarind Guar Gum Gellan Gum B. Hydrophobic Interactions Amylose Agar Agarose Agar with Gelatin Gelatin Starch Amylopectin Cornhull Gum Starch Arabogalactan Gum Ghatti Gum Karagan Ti Gum Gum Tragacanth Wheat Gum Chitin Dextrin GELRITE:www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC239477/GELRITE gellan gum (formerly known as PS-60 and S-60) is a new naturally derived, highly purified polysaccharide which displays several interesting properties, including selfgelling. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC239477/pdf/aem00167-0076.pdfIt is derived from pseudomonas species. (Kelco Div., Merck & Co., Inc., San Diego, Calif.) Look at this pic. I think it also looks like what Ruth has shown us: So..this is where the 'goo' is coming from?? Jeany
|
|
|
Post by jeany on Mar 28, 2010 9:35:01 GMT -5
Look at this picture of Hydrogel and how it has the capability to build fibrous forms: www.pharmainfo.net/devisarvani/hydrogels-novel-drug-delivery-systemStructure of hydrogel : The structure of an ideal network of tetra functional covalent cross links. Hydrogels can be made to respond to the environment and the extent of the response can be controlled. The environmental conditions to which a hydrogel can be made responsive pH,temperature,electric field,ionic strength,salt type,solvent,external stress,light or a combination of these. Jeany
|
|
|
Post by jeany on Mar 28, 2010 10:06:15 GMT -5
Chemo - Mechanical Smart GelThe hydrogel 'spikes' through radiation: Radiation synthesis of ultra-clean, sterile hydrogels as delivery devicesThe use of high energy radiation for the production of hydrogels has been proposed as a methodology for the obtainment of biocompatible matrix materials that can incorporate and release in a controlled fashion a wide variety of active ingredients. Irradiation of water solutions of hydrophilic polymers (polyacrylates, polyvinylpyrrolidone, polyvinylalcohol, polypeptides, etc.), with no use of initiators, catalysts or low molecular weight crosslinking agents, leads to the production of material devices that can show a benign toxicological profile. At the same time, being hydrogels produced via a non thermally activated process, process temperatures can be very low, even sub-ambient, therefore in situ incorporation of heat sensitive or volatile actives in the hydrogel is possible. Newer developments of this research are aimed to the production responsive hydrogels systems acting as smart cages, where smart delivery of an active ingredient is triggered by changes of pH, applied electric voltage, oxidising/reducing molecules, etc. Conjugated polymers/hydrogel nano-composites for novel sensing functions.... induced by high energy radiation crosslinking of the stabiliser. Conductive polymer nanoparticles are incorporated into a hydrogel matrix exhibiting interesting, and sometimes unique, electrochemical, electric and optical properties, such as, for example, fluorescence signals that change in intensity at the pH variance. Some applications of high energy irradiation of polymers are: Crosslinking of plastics and rubbers Curing of coatings, inks, fiber.matrix composites Production of hydrogels Aging of polymers in extreme conditions (such as nuclear plants, space environment, etc.) Surface modification for enhanced printability, wettability, adhesion with other materials and (bio)compatibility synthesis of inorganic and organic polymeric nanocomposites. **Also note how it interacts with glucose, light, temperature, ph, cholesterol, antibodies, inflammation, heavy metals....etc, as shown in the image above. This hydrogel has the capability to form from 'unswollen' (spheres producing and releasing gas) to 'swollen/collapsed' meaning it 'creates' the morg typical 'fuzzballs' and fibers. Jeany
|
|
|
Post by jeany on Mar 28, 2010 10:30:07 GMT -5
Hydrogel is also used in drug delivery systems. Look at the images and how it 'works' with the ph levels. I also found the term ' mucoadhesive' very interesting. www.pharmainfo.net/reviews/recent-trends-novel-drug-delivery-system* which would mean it works either in the stomach with low ph levels or in the intestines with high ph levels. According to this, the problem would be in order to 'disrupt' it's function to keep our ph levels balanced in a normal level. Jeany
|
|
|
Post by jeany on Mar 28, 2010 10:39:15 GMT -5
Another aspect we should consider to help dissolve these mucoadhesive properties and possibly disrupt the function of the 'hydrogel system' would be the intake of NAC. NAC is not only beneficial in helping the liver to produce more gluthiaone, which is involved in the detoxification process but is also dissolves mucous and is known to be a medicine used against sinus infections, bronchitis..etc..
Jeany
|
|