|
Post by toni on Aug 14, 2015 13:04:15 GMT -5
I'm re-posting this because I learned others that wanted to see it, didn't know where to find (this particular part) with the organism in the video, as the other video was too long to look for it.
I just now sat my camcorder "in front of my computer screen" and ONLY video'ed the "organism having a baby", ((( is what it looks like))).
This is LESS THAN 2 minutes.
You don't want to miss it.
Enlarge the video so you can see the details. It's not 'pristine clear', but it's pretty good video.
tinypic.com/player.php?v=noujc7%3E&s=8#.Vc4qjIfluUkSomething VERY important too. Watch to the end. See how it "gets all cracky looking"? Well, I touch the water it floats in (on the slide) to show it is not a case of that organism drying out, as the water it still rests in is still present. This thing literally changed textures (after it had another).
|
|
|
Post by Baraka Obam on Aug 14, 2015 15:37:56 GMT -5
Thank you for your diligence with your microscope trying always and forever to find answers, you are a real microscope trooper. One thing that concerns me whenever trying to find anything, finding more than ONE. A different little item there does not seem to be thousands of them, interesting though, there are so many biological entities on this planet, I think some forget every operating issue in our body is a congregation of such items. We are a chemistry set of chemicals compounds and minerals reacting together to make working life forms, all we see under a microscope lens does not have to be the first or last word on biological surprise. There are just to many unexplainable items, even the most simple to identify would be lost on a novice untrained in the identification of microscopic life. It would actually concern me more if there were thousands eating the debris like mad, even though it may be something very normal I would not know what it was. If we develop find a way to exhibit what will develop in test groups we would be further able to distinguish the pathogen, if not the pathogen maybe odd structures in the affected. If not the odd structures that abnormality's in the way they are able to relate to common learning ability's or such things as diminished instinct. I am still talking about using fertilized chicken eggs. There is enough literature online to begin such a study by novices very easily. What would it cost, at the least $1000 depending on equipment purchased, such as you can use hens to hatch the eggs, you do not need a incubator, but to keep the eggs in a more controlled temperature and humidity, with less involvement of outside interference such as pathogens a incubator would be nice. In fact a couple would be nice, one very good idea would be to lower temperature of the incubator, some pathogens grow better in a cooler environment. Even though it may have a effect on birth rates as I have been reading, the incubation period may just be extended a day or two. One could lower the temperature just for a time after you inject the fertilized egg with a tiny bit of our blood or the yellow fluid that flows from a lesion. I would imagine that the blood would be a better source of infectious material as the yellow fluid may be the product of just a Herpes lesion/TUMOR, the same as when you would see the fluid sacks on a herpes skin outbreak. that by the way if they come are usually in the same location as they came before.
I'm re-posting this because I learned others that wanted to see it, didn't know where to find (this particular part) with the organism in the video, as the other video was too long to look for it.
I just now sat my camcorder "in front of my computer screen" and ONLY video'ed the "organism having a baby", ((( is what it looks like))).
This is LESS THAN 2 minutes.
You don't want to miss it.
Enlarge the video so you can see the details. It's not 'pristine clear', but it's pretty good video.
tinypic.com/player.php?v=noujc7%3E&s=8#.Vc4qjIfluUkSomething VERY important too. Watch to the end. See how it "gets all cracky looking"? Well, I touch the water it floats in (on the slide) to show it is not a case of that organism drying out, as the water it still rests in is still present. This thing literally changed textures (after it had another).
|
|
|
Post by toni on Aug 14, 2015 20:17:13 GMT -5
Yes, what you've said makes good sense....and thank you.
BUT (the part that I didn't elaborate on was) these (((( organisms that I've video'ed)))) only come out of "particular specimens" and they only will come out after they've been soaking in a drop of water on the slide along with then pressing a needle on the specimen to sort of tease it out.
The way without making this too long to explain "HOW" to get them, (as they will stay within the specimen) unless teased out, in the exact location of where they are, is (if you've seen the bubbles blow out of any of your specimens) on one side, and I mean tiny bubbles that even at 400X they're hard to see, and when you see that you'll know what I mean, (if that makes sense) well, it will if you've seen what I've described, (that is where they live) - (that is where these *organisms lie). And when they come out it's very apparent they only move around for a matter of seconds, and do whatever they're going to do, then they become still.
|
|
|
Post by Baraka Obam on Aug 15, 2015 1:11:57 GMT -5
Truly, I like what you do, your trying different things and that is how people find things others have not found.
I do not know what I am seeing there but it is interesting. I must say, right now your the only one I see doing scope work.
Frankys site soured me on microscope posting, all the thousands of hours posting gone with the pictures.
I wish there was someone that would want to do the work with the eggs, I really expect if the pathogen can be seen with a common microscope the egg will produce it.
|
|
|
Post by toni on Aug 15, 2015 11:34:39 GMT -5
Truly, I like what you do, your trying different things and that is how people find things others have not found. I do not know what I am seeing there but it is interesting. I must say, right now your the only one I see doing scope work. Frankys site soured me on microscope posting, all the thousands of hours posting gone with the pictures. I wish there was someone that would want to do the work with the eggs, I really expect if the pathogen can be seen with a common microscope the egg will produce it.
Thank you also.
And yes, I'm sorry your postings are gone too, as many of our pictures (we didn't know what was what, not that we do now, haha) but.... they all mean something, and they're puzzle pieces. Everything is important.
Because within "someone's somethings" are the answers, and like finding anything in life, more eyeballs looking ...usually helps find missing things faster.
Heck, who'd of known about Reeses Peanut butter cups had no one dropped peanut butter in chocolate! I'm SOOOOO PLAYING by saying that. hehehe
And I understand about your need with wanting to experiment with the chicken eggs. Doing "tests" as we do...heck, that IS how anything is discovered, people not being afraid to just 'try'. And no matter how bizarre the "trying is"....well, bottom line is, if one stays in a grooved circle, one will never know anything but what is "in that grooved circle" if they don't break out of that groove, or the box.
AND, something else I want to say that I just learned that's important. The "organism spitting out that baby" as I called it how (it looked to me)...is NOTHING
I learned from the "Professionals" at the Foundation (and thank you ALL again) it is a basically a "case of" this, (which was new to me) of course.
*Liquid reacting to a change in osmolality around it or a hydrophilic/hydrophobic interaction*
So, I'll put that on my threads that I've gone ape all over on with this hahhaha because we don't need to waste any more time on it.
Part of me feels foolish (but then the other part of me says not too). I mean seeing that as you did, you can see why I went nuts over it, as it was too weird, hahaha
Anyways, it was extremely bizarre to me (that specimen organism thing *bubble or oil slick basically is all it is though*.
Thank you for looking, I do appreciate that.
And I sure do thank the Foundation's great people too!!!
|
|