|
Post by toni on Oct 9, 2015 14:38:41 GMT -5
Well, I'm sure learning a lot by the more I'm seeing, and maybe something I say here will sound familiar to anyone else who has seen the same.
And I know we know this about morgs infecting follicles...but, until recently have I seen (that's what the lesions were, infected follicles grouped together) and all the stuff we're pulling out of our skin, is "just junk in connection with the debris that the follicles contain, and the growth of the follicles themselves".
Whatever the bacterium and or fungi in our body that we are "infected with"......it (IMHO) is causing ((((( FOLLICLES))) and or sweat glands, oil glands, and or hair follicles to become "infected".
Which I believe are what the "lesions are" all about. Swelled up, infected follicles.
I'd heard in the past about a specific "specimen" I'd shared, scoped and pictured, that it was "was probably a follicle".
Well, now I see what was meant as I see them myself. The inflammation under the skin "seems-to-be" just that! Inflamed follicles.
I'm seeing the same (specimens exactly like a swollen follicles) come out of one of my finger tips, and I was wondering how that could be, but...of course we have "eccrine glands/sweat glands too" and apocrine glands.
And "the seed" ...which those that know what I'm talking about (from experience) in this themselves - will also see that "seeds" that seems to lie deep within the skin...is just that, "dead follicles basically with debris from die-off from the junk that's in our "follicles" after we've killed the bacteria or whatever it is inflaming our follicles of all kinds. And the area that is "inflamed or itching or burning" if it's not "rid of" with cure....will continue to infect surrounding follicles too. But once one finds what works on that area, to kill off what's infecting the follicles, then....that area heals up, but it (seems) the area won't heal (as it doesn't from my experience) until the infection in those follicles are treated and cured. I mean those follicles can stay inflamed for a long long time, (like months).
That's where I too have found that cort. cream "calms down those lumps, *inflammation*, rather follicles that are balloon'ed out" under the skin.
They feel like "thorns, or darts" as we have referred to them. And oh do they BLEED like crazy after they're picked out/plucked, just like a follicle would after they've been plucked out with tweezers, AND what a relief that is too! Because it's out! And the skin can now heal.
When the "gland or the follicles get FULL of bacteria and or fungi, they literally "burst "even under the skin"...and spew that goo up and out of the pores, which that is what makes that HARD as plastic seal, all in the name of protecting the follicle under the surface of the skin. Otherwise, (the outside world would get right into that mainstream follicle) as a way to say it.
In reading more about the fairly recent discovery of "people that are having adverse reactions to red meat" - because they've got a tick bacterium inside their body...(well...that got me thinking) dangerous stuff again, haha
WHAT IF...and I share this not to look stupid, but to give you too food for thought, and as I said, it's a (WHAT IF) thought.
So here goes on the "what if" thought.
What IF.....a particular strain of bacteria...sort of like the specific bacteria that causes a person with a tick bite to now be allergic to red meat...what if another strain of bacteria does the same thing to us not that it causes us to be allergic to red meat, but rather it causes pigments in the body to oxidize which changes their normal color, or the bacterium itself is pigmented or secretes the pigments that those cells basically color our tissue.?
I mean why not? It wasn't until recently that we learned that being bitten by a tick could forever render a person allergic to red meat. That's really something when you think about it. That tick has now deposited something in the body that forever changes it's normal chemistry!!
Say for instance, we've contracted Lyme, however the vectored means was.
Say that a "combo of bacteriums a tick is carrying" bites us...and now, we are not allergic to red meat as some have become, but we have a different thing going on, not yet discovered, in that our body now is in some kind of oxidizing proteins process to where that's where the pigment changes are coming from, or as I was saying (the pigments ARE from the actual bacteriums too) which there are many bacferiums that physically secrete "colors/pigments".
Food for thought, but....if one really checks out "what is actually making the skin in a particular area not heal, or if they wonder why it's lumped up" maybe go to a derm and he should see it's swollen follicles. What he may not be able to tell is "with what specifics are as to what bacteria and or fungi" that the follicle is swollen with". They usually just write that off to the most common bacteria, but....because of the symmetry of the "breakouts", that might clue them in that it's a deeper problem than just the skin.
|
|
|
Post by toni on Oct 9, 2015 19:35:30 GMT -5
Something I find interesting, the human body and how it works...but moreso, what Morgs does and how it "might be" doing it. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Body_odorThat link above was interesting about (body odor) haha of all things, BUT, there is a reason I posted that link, because a few years back "using what was happening to me " to what I know now, now makes MORE sense. The sentence in that link says: In humans, the formation of body odors is mainly caused by skin glands excretions and bacterial activity. We know that. Between the different types of skin glands, the human body odor is primarily the result of the apocrine sweat glands, which secrete the majority of chemical compounds etc.... I find the highlighted words interesting and you may too find them of interest. Here's why. It says the Apocrine sweat gland "do the secreting of the body odor". Maybe that's why in my finger tip I have the SAME looking follicle specimens coming out that I have else where coming out of my skin. Because it's not just my hair follicles filled with bacteria, it's my sweat glands too, (it *seems*). I say "the apocrine" because when I HAVE taken Bactrim (pulsed with it) I even mentioned here on the board about this subject (how for whatever reason in my life) I could sweat up a storm and never and I mean "seriously" ....I hardly ever got "bo'chee" if you know what I mean. I mean I've been backpacking climbing the Sierra mountains for 10 days straight, with no bath! in my past, which is may be where the ticks come in, I don't know, but even all that hiking and sweating on those 10 day trips, I still never got "stinchy" hhaha that word cracks me up. But really I didn't. So knowing my system over the years, I saw that change happen, in that when I became infected with Morgs, I began getting "stinchy" under the arms if I even got warm and barely broke a sweat. What I've mentioned in the past on the board here, is the FACT that I saw that when I took Bactrim D/S for 10 days straight, I would NOT get "BO" for at least 3 months at a time. I've "pulsed now with Bactrim" since 06, so what I'm saying "has held water for almost 10 years now". I take a Bactrim for 10 days, one a day, then I STOP taking it for 3 months, because when I've waited till 4 months time inbetween "my pits get stinchy" about 30 min after I shower! So the Bactrim D/S is playing a huge part in keeping this garbage OUT of the skins "glands"...sweat glands, follicles all that...but maybe I'm only knocking it down enough to where this "morgs garbage" is still breathing, and it takes about another 3 months for it to grow full bloom again. See what I mean? That's my point.
|
|
|
Post by toni on Oct 9, 2015 20:12:34 GMT -5
Also in reading past posts here on Bactrim, lots of people took it.
And they all said the same, they had good results, as I, but...it doesn't cure.
Is that because we've not taken it long enough, or is it because it's just not got the "Umph" needed to kill this stuff off, (as in wrong med to do the job), or do we simply have a tweaked Lyme bacteria, and I only say tweaked because "years of lyme being around in the world" ...the pigmented fibers weren't part of it or we'd of known long ago it was, that those were just part of the symptoms, but ...it's not in any literature that way, as the pigmented fibers aren't anywhere in literature.
Wow, just round and round in circles it seems sometimes.
But I do feel (in my case) and maybe in yours too, that where I once thought something was growing in and on my skin and (under my skin) no longer appears that way. I thought fungi, and I could visualize like vines throughout me darn near! But I don't see it that way now that I've gotten to "know the follicles" better, hehe
My "mat growth" is my follicles, not a mat, and that's why "imho" when I scratch anywhere on my skin...I can "cause" an eruption of what's happening underneath to come forth, because it "IS" in the gazillions of follicles that lie within the skin., which that's a lot of stuff in there that needs to come out.
And the growths "on the skin" I see differently too. That "imho" is the "spillage" up out of the pores from the bacteria and maybe fungi too. And that fluid is literally teeming with bacteria that can cause "more erruptions/sores" as it spills outwardly on the skin like a fusarium mold would grow in that it spreads outwards. Then that spillage anchors itself back into a nearby pore, which then infects that one and the follicles below the surface of that pore. Now there's a mess again.
And the cycle continues...the skin "seems to get a layer" which is this "spillage" of everything on top the skin....and we know how that goes...or this is how it's looking to me.
|
|
|
Post by toni on Oct 21, 2015 16:25:53 GMT -5
In going back again..... to CDC's "half baked" report:
Quote:
By special stains, gram-positive bacteria or fungi were detected in 12 (11 participants) and eight (eight participants) specimens, respectively.
For six of these specimens, IHC or PCR testing of the formalin-fixed tissues confirmed the bacteria as Streptococcus pyogenes (3), Staphylococcus aureus (2), or a Streptococcus sp. (1).
And, qutote:
A. Superficial and deep perivascular dermatitis with epidermal hyperplasia and prominent scale-crust. A heavy growth of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia was obtained in culture of this site.
B. Ulcerated skin with purulent exudates and serum-crust containing numerous colonies of coccoid bacteria (C) that stain intensely by using an immunohistochemical technique for Streptococcus pyogenes D and E. Purulent serum-crust from an impetiginous lesion, with abundant colonies of gram-positive coccoid bacteria (F). A heavy growth of Staphylococcus aureus was obtained in culture of this site.
So, in all reality, right here is something to work with, and that's just my thoughts.
|
|
|
Post by Baraka Obam on Oct 21, 2015 16:59:36 GMT -5
In going back again..... to CDC's "half baked" report: Quote: By special stains, gram-positive bacteria or fungi were detected in 12 (11 participants) and eight (eight participants) specimens, respectively. For six of these specimens, IHC or PCR testing of the formalin-fixed tissues confirmed the bacteria as Streptococcus pyogenes (3), Staphylococcus aureus (2), or a Streptococcus sp. (1). And, qutote: A. Superficial and deep perivascular dermatitis with epidermal hyperplasia and prominent scale-crust. A heavy growth of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia was obtained in culture of this site. B. Ulcerated skin with purulent exudates and serum-crust containing numerous colonies of coccoid bacteria (C) that stain intensely by using an immunohistochemical technique for Streptococcus pyogenes D and E. Purulent serum-crust from an impetiginous lesion, with abundant colonies of gram-positive coccoid bacteria (F). A heavy growth of Staphylococcus aureus was obtained in culture of this site. So, in all reality, right here is something to work with, and that's just my thoughts. This is probably why Phisohex has shown some results, some issues are gram positive, there is a issue I seem to think comes from treating any part of this, internal or external, with anything that does not eradicate all of it completely. It comes right back and causes havoc weather you use these items to fight it on the skin or take antibiotics internally. The malfeasants is so ingrained in every fiber of our body's I feel we would have to be baked in a oven to rid ourselves of this, then what good would we be. I have seen skin improvement with Phisohex but other than the things I started treating, more items will appear after stopping treatment, because they warn that Phisohex can be dangerous I have stopped for a moment using it. Using it on the arms after stopping caused a stabbing pain in the wrist, this was pretty severe, my assumption the same issue causes carpel tunnel, which I already had and alleviated, a case so bad it felt like my fingers were like big rocks. Long term and overuse of antibiotics for untold years most likely advanced all disease man and animal carries, making it more likely and able to morph and/or resist in ways not understood, any form of treatment.
|
|
|
Post by toni on Oct 21, 2015 20:53:52 GMT -5
In going back again..... to CDC's "half baked" report: Quote: By special stains, gram-positive bacteria or fungi were detected in 12 (11 participants) and eight (eight participants) specimens, respectively. For six of these specimens, IHC or PCR testing of the formalin-fixed tissues confirmed the bacteria as Streptococcus pyogenes (3), Staphylococcus aureus (2), or a Streptococcus sp. (1). And, qutote: A. Superficial and deep perivascular dermatitis with epidermal hyperplasia and prominent scale-crust. A heavy growth of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia was obtained in culture of this site. B. Ulcerated skin with purulent exudates and serum-crust containing numerous colonies of coccoid bacteria (C) that stain intensely by using an immunohistochemical technique for Streptococcus pyogenes D and E. Purulent serum-crust from an impetiginous lesion, with abundant colonies of gram-positive coccoid bacteria (F). A heavy growth of Staphylococcus aureus was obtained in culture of this site. So, in all reality, right here is something to work with, and that's just my thoughts. This is probably why Phisohex has shown some results, some issues are gram positive, there is a issue I seem to think comes from treating any part of this, internal or external, with anything that does not eradicate all of it completely. It comes right back and causes havoc weather you use these items to fight it on the skin or take antibiotics internally. The malfeasants is so ingrained in every fiber of our body's I feel we would have to be baked in a oven to rid ourselves of this, then what good would we be. I have seen skin improvement with Phisohex but other than the things I started treating, more items will appear after stopping treatment, because they warn that Phisohex can be dangerous I have stopped for a moment using it. Using it on the arms after stopping caused a stabbing pain in the wrist, this was pretty severe, my assumption the same issue causes carpel tunnel, which I already had and alleviated, a case so bad it felt like my fingers were like big rocks. Long term and overuse of antibiotics for untold years most likely advanced all disease man and animal carries, making it more likely and able to morph and/or resist in ways not understood, any form of treatment. Yes, I sure agree about something in the mix of morgs being a gram positive bacteria too, that makes sense to me also, and so does the rest of your post. Good post. I looked to see what Bactrim D/S was exactly, because that too works very well, but, not it's not lasting. I'd taken Bactrim D/S for several years, (but only for 10 days in a row), and I did that 10 day run only 3-4 times a year, (quarterly actually) and it kept things really under good control, but, that 10 day run with the Bactrim D/S only lasted for 3-4 months of noticing I'd hardly break out. Then when those few months were up, it was like my body timer went off, it was time again to do the 10 day run, as the Bactrim really helped. But then, out of no where, the itchies would kick in again, the breaking out, not bad though, like in the beginning. Just a few here and there, always with symmetry, bilaterally on my body and face. I copied this info about Bactrim D/S : Sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim have been shown to be active against most strains of the following microorganisms, both in vitro and in clinical infections as described in the INDICATIONS AND USAGE section. Aerobic gram-positive microorganisms Streptococcus pneumoniae Aerobic gram-negative microorganisms Escherichia coli (including susceptible enterotoxigenic strains implicated in traveler's diarrhea) Klebsiella species Enterobacter species Haemophilus influenzae Morganella morganii Proteus mirabilis Proteus vulgaris Shigella flexneri Shigella sonnei Other Organisms Pneumocystis jiroveci And yes, we're hitting on it, whatever it is, but not yet with the big club. I do understand how knocking it down does help, but darn, it's sure incredible how with all the meds we've all tried, that this isn't killed off yet. It's like it just doesn't quit. You know, there's so many combo's of meds that some infections take to rid, it's unreal. So many PubMed articles in reading, the combo's sometimes are key. But, of course that's only an avenue, because in all reality, maybe there isn't a med (yet) designed to properly rid it. But, like we're doing, we just keep on doing, because there has to be more, well...there is hahah we've just not tried it .....yet.
|
|
|
Post by itchin4answers on Oct 21, 2015 20:55:02 GMT -5
In going back again..... to CDC's "half baked" report: Quote: By special stains, gram-positive bacteria or fungi were detected in 12 (11 participants) and eight (eight participants) specimens, respectively. For six of these specimens, IHC or PCR testing of the formalin-fixed tissues confirmed the bacteria as Streptococcus pyogenes (3), Staphylococcus aureus (2), or a Streptococcus sp. (1). And, qutote: A. Superficial and deep perivascular dermatitis with epidermal hyperplasia and prominent scale-crust. A heavy growth of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia was obtained in culture of this site. B. Ulcerated skin with purulent exudates and serum-crust containing numerous colonies of coccoid bacteria (C) that stain intensely by using an immunohistochemical technique for Streptococcus pyogenes D and E. Purulent serum-crust from an impetiginous lesion, with abundant colonies of gram-positive coccoid bacteria (F). A heavy growth of Staphylococcus aureus was obtained in culture of this site. So, in all reality, right here is something to work with, and that's just my thoughts. CDC Releases 2012 Finding on 8 Year Morgellons Study www.youtube.com/watch?v=7hvSSacnwsA
|
|
|
Post by toni on Oct 21, 2015 21:06:56 GMT -5
In going back again..... to CDC's "half baked" report: Quote: By special stains, gram-positive bacteria or fungi were detected in 12 (11 participants) and eight (eight participants) specimens, respectively. For six of these specimens, IHC or PCR testing of the formalin-fixed tissues confirmed the bacteria as Streptococcus pyogenes (3), Staphylococcus aureus (2), or a Streptococcus sp. (1). And, qutote: A. Superficial and deep perivascular dermatitis with epidermal hyperplasia and prominent scale-crust. A heavy growth of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia was obtained in culture of this site. B. Ulcerated skin with purulent exudates and serum-crust containing numerous colonies of coccoid bacteria (C) that stain intensely by using an immunohistochemical technique for Streptococcus pyogenes D and E. Purulent serum-crust from an impetiginous lesion, with abundant colonies of gram-positive coccoid bacteria (F). A heavy growth of Staphylococcus aureus was obtained in culture of this site. So, in all reality, right here is something to work with, and that's just my thoughts. CDC Releases 2012 Finding on 8 Year Morgellons Study www.youtube.com/watch?v=7hvSSacnwsAThanks Itchin, I don't think I've ever seen this video, I'll definitely check it out.
|
|
|
Post by toni on Oct 21, 2015 21:13:04 GMT -5
Baraka,
Something I just got thinking about, and I don't know if it has any relevance or not, but I'll share it.
I've tried "crushing oral Bactrim D/S tablets to use topically". It didn't work...now that probably was for many reasons. I didn't use it long enough, I don't know because maybe it wouldn't work (topically)...I don't know if I had used it a month if that would make a difference though either.
But, your point about the Phisohex of course is imho, is very good info in regards to the gram positive facet.
|
|
|
Post by Baraka Obam on Oct 21, 2015 23:31:39 GMT -5
Baraka, Something I just got thinking about, and I don't know if it has any relevance or not, but I'll share it. I've tried "crushing oral Bactrim D/S tablets to use topically". It didn't work...now that probably was for many reasons. I didn't use it long enough, I don't know because maybe it wouldn't work (topically)...I don't know if I had used it a month if that would make a difference though either. But, your point about the Phisohex of course is imho, is very good info in regards to the gram positive facet. Tried the same thing, there are a couple of ways the antibiotics work destroying the pathogens, they either destroy the cell walls and they burst or destroy the ability to reproduce. A little on that, Antibiotics work in one of a few ways: by either interfering with the bacteria's ability to repair its damaged DNA, by stopping the bacteria's ability to make what it needs to grow new cells, or by weakening the bacteria's cell wall until it bursts. Most antibiotics on the market are considered broad spectrum, which means they are effective against a lot of different types of bacteria, both Gram-positive and Gram-negative. Fluoroquinolones (used to treat infections ranging from urinary tract infections to pneumonia and anthrax) and tetracyclines (used to treat everything from acne to gonorrhea as well as stomach ulcers) are both examples of broad spectrum antibiotics -- these antibiotics can clear up many types of bacterial infections. Narrow spectrum antibiotics, on the other hand, are effective against specific, targeted groups of bacteria -- either Gram-negative or Gram-positive but not both. So if it not able to be dispersed in the fluids where the infections live then it will not do its job. For skin issues there is usually a carrier
|
|
|
Post by itchin4answers on Oct 22, 2015 4:45:33 GMT -5
I was given Gentamicin 45 years ago to treat Erysipelas "an acute, sometimes recurrent disease caused by a bacterial infection, characterized by large raised red patches on the skin".I am now taking a sinus spray which has Gentamicin in it, this is to treat chronic sinus mucosal disease. Gentamicin, sold under the brand name Garamycin among other, is an antibiotic used to treat many types of bacterial infections.[1] This may include bone infections, endocarditis, pelvic inflammatory disease, meningitis, pneumonia, urinary tract infections, and sepsis among others. It is not effective for gonorrhea or chlamydia infections. It can be given intravenously, by injection into a muscle, or topically.[1] Topical formulations may be used in burns or for infections of the outside of the eye.[2] In the developed world it is often only used for two days until bacterial cultures determine what antibiotics the infection is sensitive to.[3] The dose required should be monitored by blood testing.[1] Gentamicin can cause inner ear problems and kidney problems.[1] The inner ear problems can include problems with balance and problems with hearing. These problems may be permanent. If used during pregnancy it can cause harm to the baby.[1] It appears to be safe for use during breastfeeding.[4] Gentamicin is a type of aminoglycoside. It works by stopping the bacteria from making protein which typically kills the bacteria.[1] Gentamicin was discovered in 1963.[5] It is made from the bacteria Micromonospora purpurea.[1] Gentamicin is on the World Health Organization's List of Essential Medicines, the most important medication needed in a basic health system.[6] It is available as a generic medication.[7] It wholesale cost is between 0.05 and 0.58 USD per day.[8] Active against a wide range of bacterial infections, mostly Gram-negative bacteria including Pseudomonas, Proteus, Serratia, and the Gram-positive Staphylococcus.[9] Gentamicin is not used for Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Neisseria meningitidis or Legionella pneumophila bacterial infections (because of the risk of the person going into shock from lipid A endotoxin found in certain Gram-negative organisms). Gentamicin is also useful against Yersinia pestis, its relatives, and Francisella tularensis (the organism responsible for tularemia seen often in hunters and/or trappers).[10] Some Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas spp., enterococci, Staphylococcus aureus and other staphylococci are resistant to gentamicin sulfate, to varying degrees.[11] en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gentamicin
|
|
|
Post by toni on Oct 22, 2015 9:41:53 GMT -5
Baraka, Something I just got thinking about, and I don't know if it has any relevance or not, but I'll share it. I've tried "crushing oral Bactrim D/S tablets to use topically". It didn't work...now that probably was for many reasons. I didn't use it long enough, I don't know because maybe it wouldn't work (topically)...I don't know if I had used it a month if that would make a difference though either. But, your point about the Phisohex of course is imho, is very good info in regards to the gram positive facet. Tried the same thing, there are a couple of ways the antibiotics work destroying the pathogens, they either destroy the cell walls and they burst or destroy the ability to reproduce. A little on that, Antibiotics work in one of a few ways: by either interfering with the bacteria's ability to repair its damaged DNA, by stopping the bacteria's ability to make what it needs to grow new cells, or by weakening the bacteria's cell wall until it bursts. Most antibiotics on the market are considered broad spectrum, which means they are effective against a lot of different types of bacteria, both Gram-positive and Gram-negative. Fluoroquinolones (used to treat infections ranging from urinary tract infections to pneumonia and anthrax) and tetracyclines (used to treat everything from acne to gonorrhea as well as stomach ulcers) are both examples of broad spectrum antibiotics -- these antibiotics can clear up many types of bacterial infections. Narrow spectrum antibiotics, on the other hand, are effective against specific, targeted groups of bacteria -- either Gram-negative or Gram-positive but not both. So if it not able to be dispersed in the fluids where the infections live then it will not do its job. For skin issues there is usually a carrier Yes, I sure see the logic. Thanks.
|
|
|
Post by toni on Oct 22, 2015 9:48:38 GMT -5
I was given Gentamicin 45 years ago to treat Erysipelas "an acute, sometimes recurrent disease caused by a bacterial infection, characterized by large raised red patches on the skin".I am now taking a sinus spray which has Gentamicin in it, this is to treat chronic sinus mucosal disease. Gentamicin, sold under the brand name Garamycin among other, is an antibiotic used to treat many types of bacterial infections.[1] This may include bone infections, endocarditis, pelvic inflammatory disease, meningitis, pneumonia, urinary tract infections, and sepsis among others. It is not effective for gonorrhea or chlamydia infections. It can be given intravenously, by injection into a muscle, or topically.[1] Topical formulations may be used in burns or for infections of the outside of the eye.[2] In the developed world it is often only used for two days until bacterial cultures determine what antibiotics the infection is sensitive to.[3] The dose required should be monitored by blood testing.[1] Gentamicin can cause inner ear problems and kidney problems.[1] The inner ear problems can include problems with balance and problems with hearing. These problems may be permanent. If used during pregnancy it can cause harm to the baby.[1] It appears to be safe for use during breastfeeding.[4] Gentamicin is a type of aminoglycoside. It works by stopping the bacteria from making protein which typically kills the bacteria.[1] Gentamicin was discovered in 1963.[5] It is made from the bacteria Micromonospora purpurea.[1] Gentamicin is on the World Health Organization's List of Essential Medicines, the most important medication needed in a basic health system.[6] It is available as a generic medication.[7] It wholesale cost is between 0.05 and 0.58 USD per day.[8] Active against a wide range of bacterial infections, mostly Gram-negative bacteria including Pseudomonas, Proteus, Serratia, and the Gram-positive Staphylococcus.[9] Gentamicin is not used for Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Neisseria meningitidis or Legionella pneumophila bacterial infections (because of the risk of the person going into shock from lipid A endotoxin found in certain Gram-negative organisms). Gentamicin is also useful against Yersinia pestis, its relatives, and Francisella tularensis (the organism responsible for tularemia seen often in hunters and/or trappers).[10] Some Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas spp., enterococci, Staphylococcus aureus and other staphylococci are resistant to gentamicin sulfate, to varying degrees.[11] en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GentamicinHi Itchin, I've tried the gentamicin too, in fact I tried to post a pic of the tube of it that I have, but it looks like the capacity of being able to post a picture here anymore is gone??? I don't see the "icons" to do anything actually except post our print. The tube of gentamicin I have though is "ophthalmic" so I don't know if that was the reason I didn't have any luck with it, but, I don't know if (because I used it topically) on my skin vs the eyes- if that's the reason I didn't have luck with it...I don't know but I hope it helps your sinuses.
|
|
|
Post by itchin4answers on Oct 22, 2015 19:44:52 GMT -5
In going back again..... to CDC's "half baked" report: Quote: By special stains, gram-positive bacteria or fungi were detected in 12 (11 participants) and eight (eight participants) specimens, respectively. For six of these specimens, IHC or PCR testing of the formalin-fixed tissues confirmed the bacteria as Streptococcus pyogenes (3), Staphylococcus aureus (2), or a Streptococcus sp. (1). And, qutote: A. Superficial and deep perivascular dermatitis with epidermal hyperplasia and prominent scale-crust. A heavy growth of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia was obtained in culture of this site. B. Ulcerated skin with purulent exudates and serum-crust containing numerous colonies of coccoid bacteria (C) that stain intensely by using an immunohistochemical technique for Streptococcus pyogenes D and E. Purulent serum-crust from an impetiginous lesion, with abundant colonies of gram-positive coccoid bacteria (F). A heavy growth of Staphylococcus aureus was obtained in culture of this site. So, in all reality, right here is something to work with, and that's just my thoughts. This is probably why Phisohex has shown some results, some issues are gram positive, there is a issue I seem to think comes from treating any part of this, internal or external, with anything that does not eradicate all of it completely. It comes right back and causes havoc weather you use these items to fight it on the skin or take antibiotics internally. The malfeasants is so ingrained in every fiber of our body's I feel we would have to be baked in a oven to rid ourselves of this, then what good would we be. I have seen skin improvement with Phisohex but other than the things I started treating, more items will appear after stopping treatment, because they warn that Phisohex can be dangerous I have stopped for a moment using it. Using it on the arms after stopping caused a stabbing pain in the wrist, this was pretty severe, my assumption the same issue causes carpel tunnel, which I already had and alleviated, a case so bad it felt like my fingers were like big rocks. Long term and overuse of antibiotics for untold years most likely advanced all disease man and animal carries, making it more likely and able to morph and/or resist in ways not understood, any form of treatment. Yes, carpel tunnel syndrome, developed that in the mid 90's. By the time morgs was on it's way to full blown, I had to wear splints on my wrists due to weakness, THEN the lesions developed on the hands and wrists. My hands were like rocks, and so were my arms, I could not extend my arms, my entire skin on my body was hard as a rock. This link is rubbish IMO www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12324639and we do know that Gulf War Syndrome is Mycoplasma Fermenten's incognito strain. www.immed.org/illness/gulfwar_illness_research.html
|
|
|
Post by itchin4answers on Oct 23, 2015 20:40:01 GMT -5
Thanks Itchin, I don't think I've ever seen this video, I'll definitely check it out. If you watch at the 1.17 minute mark, you will see the "piranha bite marks". That is what I called those lesions. That is exactly what I had on my face in 1999 "piranha bite marks".
|
|