|
Post by toni on Nov 10, 2015 8:52:37 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by threader on Nov 11, 2015 22:33:39 GMT -5
The news is getting better. The new Mayo Clinic description precedes the CDC description in the article.
|
|
|
Post by toni on Nov 12, 2015 11:59:48 GMT -5
The news is getting better. The new Mayo Clinic description precedes the CDC description in the article. I see what you mean Threader. Yes, it's a bit better-they're sounding a tad more on the fence about it now. I'm curious as to how the outcome is going to fall, (if this fake doctor) learns they're not going to solidly accept Morgellons as a "disease condition", or if they're going to lean towards Morgs being delusional. I guess if I were that "fake doctors attorney" and my job was to get him off the hook, (learning if there's still going to be a delusional stigma attached in any way to Morgellons), then I'd say the guy had "that delusional problem" as to help him- IF I were his attorney. I think the "acknowledgement" of Morgs will have to be established in some way with this trial, being he gets a lesser sentence (because he can really fall back on the delusional stuff - I would think, as far as the attorney goes in regards to his client) or... they'll *accept* Morgellons being a health disease condition, and throw the book at him. It will be interesting, because Morgellons "has to come up", I'd sure think in some way.
|
|
|
Post by ruthintoronto on Nov 14, 2015 22:19:48 GMT -5
Yes this will be interesting to watch how they deal with the morgellons aspect.
|
|