|
Post by bessie on May 31, 2008 9:20:05 GMT -5
I, too, must say goodbye. When I came down with this thing, I made a committment - "No stone unturned" in my quest for answers. I believe that I have found those answers - maybe not as complete a picture as I would like - but the framework is quite clear. Dr. Staninger is right about all of this. My opinion is not swayed by blind loyalty or emotion, but through a careful sorting through of INFORMATION that is SCIENTIFICALLY VERIFIED. As horrific as her paradigm is, it is the only one that makes sense AND supported by hard science. The reason I am leaving is because the vast majority of the members here refuse to accept or even consider the evidence. It totally bewilders me. How many people even listened to the radio program(s) last night? What can be your possible motive for not examining all the EVIDENCE? Don't you want the truth? This woman has made considerable sacrfice to help us. Why would people so shamelessly trash her without even taking a close look at her findings, listen to her interviews, etc? What other scientist is out there doing this kind of public appeal, granting numerous interviews, etc? Don't shoot yourself in the foot.... Goodbye, Bessie
|
|
|
Post by godsgrace on May 31, 2008 9:47:27 GMT -5
Bessie, I am sorry that you feel this way but you know, my dear, it is a two way street.
You are so upset at others for not taking your view about Dr Hildy. I will be researching info/videos on her today because I for one, tend to believe what she has to say.
I presented you with information regarding mycoplasma as the cause of dis-eases like MS/CFS/Fibro/ALS ect...
You told me that you would give me the new dis-eases like CFS and Fibro being caused by mycoplasma but that there was no way that the myco could be responsible for your MS because MS is an ancient disease and has been here forever.
I even asked you if it was possible that you had the genetic pre-disposition for MS and the myco took up in your "weak spot" and caused your MS. You said no. You told me there was no way that myco causes MS without even hearing me out or conceiving the possibility of it.
I guess what I'm saying is that you are getting upset at other people for doing to you exactly what you did to me. You made up your mind without considering all of the evidence.
I'm not trying to be mean, just trying to get my point across.
You have come a long way Bessie, on your own like most of us.
I am sorry you feel so strongly about others not taking your view that you are leaving the forum.
You truly are a great lady Bessie and I wish you only the best.
Sincerely,
godsgrace
|
|
|
Post by friskers on May 31, 2008 10:35:50 GMT -5
Sorry your leaving Bessie. You know at least 6 people here feel they too have the answers and are backed by hard evidence. And they too get frustrated when they feel they arent being lestened to. I think you ALL may have peices to the puzzle and choose to still keep an open mind. And honestly I dont care so much what this is, I hardly read people theorys anymore. I come here to find treatment........and for some human contact But again Im sorry your leaving and hope you change your mind
|
|
|
Post by angela on May 31, 2008 10:41:43 GMT -5
There is nothing better than DEBATE. that is how one finds the TRUTH.
The reason I am leaving is because the vast majority of the members here refuse to accept or even consider the evidence. It totally bewilders me.
If this was truly the case.....than it is I who should leave because I am the only one spouting off about "one organism" But im not going anywhere at this point. I hope you dont either. and I hope Dr. Hildy doesnt stop doing what she is doing either.
Dr. Hildy is bringing awareness to this cause.... whether it be NANO or "ONE ORGANISM ACTING NOVEL"
Debate and digging finds the truth. It is a process.
We may not agree on a theory....... but it doesnt mean we do not agree this is hell and that an answer must be found.
I hope you change your mind. angela
|
|
|
Post by friskers on May 31, 2008 21:17:16 GMT -5
Id like to add that there could be many ways to get this disease morgellons just like there are many ways to get cancer or other diseases. It doesnt have to be one way only. I personally dont feel I have nano machines in me but maybe some of you do , Im sure its possible! Its kind of like religion to me, theres many ways to find God.But I find it senseless to have argue whos way or religion is better. And you guys who have such strong theorys sometimes take it way too personal when others dont agree with you
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on May 31, 2008 22:16:33 GMT -5
Hey Bessie,
Dr. Hildy has done some wonderful work, more than any other on the Morgellons, that we are told about. Many on here, have secrets and know what this is as well, but, do not tell us.
As soon as I see that alchemy, nano and convergence, molecular machines and DNA all have something in common, well then my stuff is moved as well.
There are two camps here, one thinks it is all biological, worms, snakes, mycoplasma, biofilms, sponges, chlamydia, and so on......
The other is high tech, molecular machines, the next walk after the double strand DNA.
So, why do we need to have artificial DNA molecules, enzymes, proteomes, etc?
We are still at the beginning, there is something non natural, non biological in us.
Call it molecular machine, nano machine, nano device, buckyball,
Well, to the new high tech.
Evolutionary theory allowed this to happen, it over took schools, it over took the debate, banned the Intelligent Design folks, but, yet, they have gone from evolutionary patterns right into high tech.
Evolutionary origin of species, once you find the origin, you recreate it. Slowly, slowly we have been recreated.
Some may have what Jurvetson from the TED folks says, the unaccounted for intermediaries, those novel organisms created in a lab, which are now considered new species.
This is bottom up nano brickbuilding, like legos, what do you start with?
Those who make bioweapons including the imported scientists from way back, who just continued here, some knew of nano before anyone here, even mentioned it. They knew of bacteriophages, used not instead of antibiotics. However, the virus remains.
Intermediaries fit the gaps on the way to Artificial DNA, enzymes, proteins, but before this was integrated, other intermediaries were released.
These were phorid flies, these were the parisitoid wasp, which can lay eggs on you and grow the little bugger in you, like the phorid fly, and then there are the sponges, the diatoms used in brick building of skeletal material of humans and animals, then the biomineralization and the aether, or ether, is used to form substance, along with carbon, silica, oxygen, hydrogen which can bond many things.
Add some free energy to the bunch and you got some real physics going on.
The electrical DNA. and so on. This science is out there.
We are just tapping it, when we cannot go beyond the natural, because we are going to have to face the fact that nature has been altered. Plastic is growing in p. putida, p. aerunginosa, zylene and petroleum mixing with the microbes and making a new species.
The aerosol operations under guise of climate change is causing climate change, can change the climate to what is desired, but, is that the real reason? Or does the artificial now have to be incorporated on full scale by the aerosol operations?
Particulate matter from Chemtrail fallout, Carnicom has the evidence.
We are breathing this in, it is aggregating in our guts, causing calcite formations,
Alumina ground down can cause forest fires. This is in Chemtrails, also the spider web material carry spores, I have seen them. I have seen the spider webs in the trees, and they go from the top of the trees to the ground. Way back, when chemtrails began, I saw the spores, triangular shape.
What is Mobile DNA?
So, there is natural stuff going on, there is Chagas Disease all over now, there are protists that merge with Algae, there are diseases on mussels, there is e-coli in water, there is increase in c. difficile, there are a lot of people with what they call Colitis. What is it actually? Is that really mycoplasma?
Don't think like Pasteur, it is a germ, it is one thing, it no longer is.
For some of us who have had this longer, we have other viruses, that have been dormant, and now with new viruses, and mycoplasmas, we are having some viruses come out that have been dormant.
Some of us have rickets type stuff, some have the bugs growing out of them, but many many with Morgellons have a fiber that cannot be identified?
Why is that? because it is not biological only, it has some chemicals in it, some polymer, Not our polymer, but synthetic meaning man made, with viral components or spores in them, these spores can be sythetic or they can be natural, some silica not normally found in body turning to silicon because of chemical reaction in our bodies, increased ammonia,
Dr. Hildy has a very good handle on this. Why have the aerosol operations never been talked about in the main stream media? Because it is covert.
Why has the genome walked right into evolutionary theory? because the genes the proteins the enzymes, the bone, the muscle fibers, the nerves can be simulated.
Cells can be simulated, can be synthesized, heard of the synthetic blood?
Why does man's natural body have to be transformed? Because of the releases of things in the environment, particulate matter, vaccines grown in tomato plants, vaccines grown into other plants as well.
The fibers are not natural muscle, nerve fibers in our body, they are man made.
They carry the seeds of artificial life.
So, to say anyone is wrong or right, is up to the whistle blowers, who know how this all came about, and are afraid to tell the truth, and for those who love keeping secrets just as well as those who created it.
So, who is trying to help? Marshall Protocol, one way. Dr. Hildy the other, so both going after the immune system, and building the body up..
The rest, either like their secrets, and think they have the goods, and will not tell us, or as these two brave souls are doing, are doing everything in their power to help us.
How do you treat something you cannot identify?
So, until the whistlers face reality and what has been done to the human race or races as they see fit, then we will either do what we can to help ourselves get well, and follow those who are getting well.
There should be no leaving here, or anywhere, the LB folks have been so kind to let us discuss these things.
Some do have other things going on besides Morgellons, and they need to look at their total health.
So, leaving? why?
Even those sponges have a place at the table, so does the mycoplasma, so does the particulate matter, alchemy science as well, we no longer need to keep it secret.
If so, then the people will suffer.
We have had our share, so please simmer down, and follow the leads we have been given.
At some point in time, it will come together. There will be no agendas, there will be no secrets, there will be no with held information from MRF, OK, Dr. Hildy, Dr. Marshall, or whoever is on top of this and covering it up, including the NIH who knows nothing about it? or the CDC dragging their feet? waiting for the antidote? then can name it whatever they want?
Sometimes the box is just too small, sometimes the box is black, like Darwin's black box, sometimes one has to escape the box, sometimes one has to push the cart further down the road, sometimes we have to stick our necks out.
Hang in there all, truth is real, but, is hard to recognize because of the numerous lies, and leads that are forced upon us.
Truth is very simple, really. Sometimes proof of truth, is even more exciting.
Some are doing that.
Sorry to go on, but, we will know soon. The best scientists do not look for gold, they look for what they can contribute to this "Life is Good " Concept.
Skytroll
|
|
|
Post by browncircles on May 31, 2008 22:20:16 GMT -5
Gee, you know SCIENTIFICALLY VERIFIED takes a little more than what Hildy has done. Sure, she's right about some things but she's taking a big leap into space with others.
I'm glad she is helping people and speaking out. I have listened to all her radio shows and I called in a question on one. I asked her how this could be "new" technology when I've had it for at least 29 years and some people say 50 or 60 years. She did not answer my question but talked about something else.
She is right about some things. Don't get me wrong. I'm glad she's on our side.
|
|
|
Post by liatris on May 31, 2008 22:24:20 GMT -5
Id like to add that there could be many ways to get this disease morgellons just like there are many ways to get cancer or other diseases. It doesnt have to be one way only. I personally dont feel I have nano machines in me but maybe some of you do , Im sure its possible! Its kind of like religion to me, theres many ways to find God.But I find it senseless to have argue whos way or religion is better. And you guys who have such strong theorys sometimes take it way too personal when others dont agree with you What Friski said about how she feels she does not have nano machines in her but others may --- makes me want to say this. I AM SURE that not everyone on this board has the same thing anyway. MANY have the fibers which may be what defines "Morgellons" -- I do NOT have any fibers. I KNOW I have skin parasites - I do have proof of that. Some have been found to have Collembola. How is this linked to the fibers and nano machines ? There seems to be a connection. Then we have a member who sees mties (possibly bird or rodent mites). Then we have all the people from a recent thread who got whatever they have from exposure to birds and bird poop (Ant) and many others. So, this board is found by many people all of whom have weird skin stuff. SInce Mary Leito defined Morgellons according to what she originally found in her youngest son, then those of us who do not fit that set of symptoms, technically do NOT have "Morgellons". I do not have fibers, I do have lesions. So I would not fit the criteria. My point is that what Friski said is likely very much the case. If we do not all have the exact same thing, then we cannot squabble about theories of origins of disease. If Dr. Hildy has found all these things to be true, then for those people who do have the the set of symptoms she is studying, she should be applauded. And if it turns out that the majority of people who have that get better on her treatment protocol - then stupendous ! For all of those who have not listened to her speak with Gary Null (Skytroll's recent post) - it is worth listening to.
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on May 31, 2008 22:28:32 GMT -5
That depends on what Scientific paradigm one is using, and who controls the outcome of discoveries. If discoveries are freely reported to the public, then I see good in that, even if they may be wrong, at least they have made an attempt to solve the problem, as they discover what it is.
No more secrets, open access, come on.........
Woods Hole is not scientific? That is as top notch as you can get, unless they are not above board. They get lots of funds, they discover many things, they have done some good the Chesapeake Bay projects, these are highly professional.
So, whose science is correct? Many scientists do not agree on things, and many many have agendas they follow.
Skytroll
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on May 31, 2008 22:35:26 GMT -5
Friski,
collembolas and mites can carry the seed for the machine, the building block, the virus, the bacteria etc.
Yes, we all have fibers, but we are accumulating them, they are not integrating in us. Does that mean that those who integrate them are integrating the artificial DNA, DNA is 2 nm while nanotube is 1 nm, so you can see how close they are.
Carnicom found fibers in those who do not have Morgellons as well.
We accumulate them, so we have bundles, and replication, and the only natural thing that replicates is a virus. However, the virus could have recombinant DNA in it as well.
not much, molecular machines are molecules, can be synthetic molecular machines,
Why was Feynman so excited about them?
One can see the line from Darwin to double helix to molecular machines, to the Genome, to artificial synthetic cells, DNA etc. nano.
Skytroll
|
|
|
Post by robertalouise26 on May 31, 2008 23:53:20 GMT -5
Hi there dear skytroll we haven't communicated for quite some time. I just want to tell you that when I was on the Nuspa board I became very friendly with a lady who new lots and lots about identifying things that we may have. She asked me to send over some of my specimens which I did. Hundreds of them. they were in sealed bags. Well when she started to look at them under her microscope she found a phorid fly and a twisted winged fly and bugs and a beetle like thing that she didn't know. She wouldn't have my specimens in her house she kept them in the boot of an old car that she didn't use anymore. When I sent specimens to Bobby Brown at Kansas State University (an entomologist) he looked at only a small sample of my specimens I send him thousands!!! He found a rare spider and lots of moths. Hope all is going well with you skytroll much much love. Roberta.
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Jun 1, 2008 0:49:46 GMT -5
Yep, I think they used insect stem cells for many things and then these weird things were grown. I wonder how many generation of these they have done.
Doing fairly well, and you, hope all is well there in that beautiful land you live.
Beautiful country.
Skytroll
|
|
|
Post by friskers on Jun 1, 2008 2:00:26 GMT -5
Liatris i agree we probably all dont have the same thing. I have fibers but no lesions. Ive never had what people are saying is biofilm or goo, slime ect......... i dont beleive I have mites or bugs either. For me I think its mostly candida and or mold related.
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Jun 1, 2008 8:26:42 GMT -5
How about yeast, s. cereviseae, yeast in bread, if you change the genes of that yeast, you change the bread. will still rise, but the yeast is altered. How would you know.
Best way? food doesn't digest.
What is lipase?
Lipase A computer-generated image of a type of pancreatic lipase (PLRP2) from the guinea pig. PDB 1GPL. A computer-generated image of a type of pancreatic lipase (PLRP2) from the guinea pig. PDB 1GPL.
A lipase is a water-soluble enzyme that catalyzes the hydrolysis of ester bonds in water–insoluble, lipid substrates[1]. Lipases thus comprise a subclass of the esterases.
Lipases perform essential roles in the digestion, transport and processing of dietary lipids (e.g. triglycerides, fats, oils) in most- if not all- living organisms. Genes encoding lipases are even present in certain viruses. [2][3]
Function
Most lipases act at a specific position on the glycerol backbone of a lipid substrate (A1, A2 or A3).
In the example of human pancreatic lipase (HPL)[4], which is the main enzyme responsible for breaking down fats in the human digestive system, a lipase acts to convert triglyceride substrates found in oils from food to monoglycerides and free fatty acids.
Myriad of other lipase activities exist in nature, especially when the phospholipases[5] and sphingomyelinases[6] are considered.
Structure
While a diverse array of genetically distinct lipase enzymes are found in nature, and represent several types of protein folds and catalytic mechanisms, most are built on an alpha/beta hydrolase fold [7][8][9] (see image[10]) and employ a chymotrypsin-like hydrolysis mechanism involving a serine nucleophile, an acid residue (usually aspartic acid), and a histidine[11][12].
Physiological distribution
Lipases are involved in diverse biological processes ranging from routine metabolism of dietary triglycerides to cell signaling[13] and inflammation[14]. Thus, some lipase activities are confined to specific compartments within cells while others work in extracellular spaces.
* In the example of lysosomal lipase, the enzyme is confined within an organelle called the lysosome.
* Other lipase enzymes, such as pancreatic lipases, are secreted into extracellular spaces where they serve to process dietary lipids into more simple forms that can be more easily absorbed and transported throughout the body.
* Fungi and bacteria may secrete lipases to facilitate nutrient absorption from the external medium (or in examples of pathogenic microbes, to promote invasion of a new host).
* Certain wasp and bee venoms contain phospholipases that enhance the "biological payload" of injury and inflammation delivered by a sting.
* As biological membranes are integral to living cells and are largely composed of phospholipids, lipases play important roles in cell biology.
Lipases of humans
The main lipases of the human digestive system are human pancreatic lipase (HPL) and pancreatic lipase related protein 2 (PLRP2), which are secreted by the pancreas. Humans also have several other related enzymes, including hepatic lipase (HL), endothelial lipase, and lipoprotein lipase. Not all of these lipases function in the gut (see table).
Name Gene Location Description Disorder
pancreatic lipase PNLIP digestive juice In order to exhibit optimal enzyme activity in the gut lumen, HPL requires another protein, colipase, which is also secreted by the pancreas[15]. -
lysosomal lipase LIPA interior space of organelle: lysosome Also referred to as lysosomal acid lipase (LAL or LIPA) or acid cholesteryl ester hydrolase Cholesteryl ester storage disease (CESD) and Wolman disease are both caused by mutations in the gene encoding lysosomal lipase.[16]
hepatic lipase LIPC endothelium Hepatic lipase acts on the remaining lipids carried on lipoproteins in the blood to regenerate LDL (low density lipoprotein). -
lipoprotein lipase LPL or "LIPD" endothelium Lipoprotein lipase functions in the blood to act on triacylglycerides carried on VLDL (very low density lipoprotein) so that cells can take up the freed fatty acids. Lipoprotein lipase deficiency is caused by mutations in the gene encoding lipoprotein lipase.[17] [18]
hormone-sensitive lipase LIPE intracellular - - gastric lipase LIPF digestive juice Functions in the infant at a near-neutral pH to aid in the digestion of lipids -
endothelial lipase LIPG endothelium - - pancreatic lipase related protein 2 PNLIPRP2 or "PLRP2" - digestive juice - - pancreatic lipase related protein 1 PNLIPRP1 or "PLRP1" digestive juice Pancreatic lipase related protein 1 is very similar to PLRP2 and HPL by amino acid sequence (all three genes probably arose via gene duplication of a single ancestral pancreatic lipase gene). However, PLRP1 is devoid of detectable lipase activity and its function remains unknown, even though it is conserved in other mammals[19][20]. -
lingual lipase ? digestive juice - -
Other lipases include LIPH, LIPI, LIPJ, LIPK, LIPM, LIPN, MGLL, DAGLA, DAGLB, and CEL.
There also are a diverse array of phospholipases, but these are not always classified with the other lipases.
Industrial Uses
Lipases from fungi and bacteria serve important roles in human practices as ancient as yogurt and cheese fermentation. However, lipases are also being exploited as cheap and versatile catalysts to degrade lipids in more modern applications. For instance, a biotechnology company has brought recombinant lipase enzymes to market for use in applications such as baking, laundry detergents and even as biocatalysts [21] in alternative energy strategies to convert vegetable oil into fuel. [22][23]
Additional images
General formula of a carboxylate ester
Glycerol
General structure of a triglyceride
References
1. ^ Svendsen A (2000). "Lipase protein engineering". Biochim Biophys Acta 1543 (2): 223-228. PMID 11150608. 2. ^ Afonso C, Tulman E, Lu Z, Oma E, Kutish G, Rock D (1999). "The genome of Melanoplus sanguinipes entomopoxvirus". J Virol 73 (1): 533-52. PMID 9847359. 3. ^ Girod A, Wobus C, Zádori Z, Ried M, Leike K, Tijssen P, Kleinschmidt J, Hallek M (2002). "The VP1 capsid protein of adeno-associated virus type 2 is carrying a phospholipase A2 domain required for virus infectivity". J Gen Virol 83 (Pt 5): 973-8. PMID 11961250. 4. ^ Winkler FK, D'Arcy A, and W Hunziker (1990). "Structure of human pancreatic lipase". Nature 343 (6260): 771-774. doi:10.1038/343771a0. PMID 2106079. 5. ^ Diaz, B.L., and J. P. Arm. (2003). "Phospholipase A(2).". Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids 2-3: 87-97. PMID 12895591. 6. ^ Goñi F, Alonso A (2002). "Sphingomyelinases: enzymology and membrane activity". FEBS Lett 531 (1): 38-46. doi:10.1016/S0014-5793(02)03482-8. PMID 12401200. 7. ^ Schrag J, Cygler M. "Lipases and alpha/beta hydrolase fold". Methods Enzymol 284: 85-107. PMID 9379946. 8. ^ Winkler FK, D'Arcy A, and W Hunziker (1990). "Structure of human pancreatic lipase". Nature 343 (6260): 771-774. doi:10.1038/343771a0. PMID 2106079. 9. ^ Egmond, M. R., and C. J. van Bemmel (1997). "Impact of Structural Information on Understanding of Lipolytic Function". Methods Enzymol 284: 119-129. PMID 9379930. 10. ^ Withers-Martinez C, Carriere F, Verger R, Bourgeois D, and C Cambillau (1996). "A pancreatic lipase with a phospholipase A1 activity: crystal structure of a chimeric pancreatic lipase-related protein 2 from guinea pig". Structure 4 (11): 1363-74. PMID 8939760. 11. ^ Brady, L., A. M. Brzozowski, Z. S. Derewenda, E. Dodson, G. Dodson, S. Tolley, J. P. Turkenburg, L. Christiansen, B. Huge-Jensen, L. Norskov, and et al. (1990). "A serine protease triad forms the catalytic centre of a triacylglycerol lipase.". Nature 343 (6260): 767-70. doi:10.1038/343767a0. PMID 2304552. 12. ^ Lowe ME (1992). "The catalytic site residues and interfacial binding of human pancreatic lipase". J Biol Chem 267 (24): 17069-73. PMID 1512245. 13. ^ Spiegel S, Foster D, and R Kolesnick (1996). "Signal transduction through lipid second messengers". Curr Opin Cell Biol 8 (2): 159-67. doi:10.1016/S0955-0674(96)80061-5. PMID 8791422. 14. ^ Tjoelker LW, Eberhardt C, Unger J, Trong HL, Zimmerman GA, McIntyre TM, Stafforini DM, Prescott SM, and PW Gray (1995). "Plasma platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase is a secreted phospholipase A2 with a catalytic triad". J Biol Chem 270 (43): 25481-7. PMID 7592717. 15. ^ Lowe ME (2002). "The triglyceride lipases of the pancreas". J Lipid Res 43 (12): 2007-16. doi:10.1194/jlr.R200012-JLR200. PMID 12454260. 16. ^ Omim - Wolman Disease 17. ^ Familial lipoprotein lipase deficiency - Genetics Home Reference 18. ^ Gilbert B, Rouis M, Griglio S, de Lumley L, Laplaud P. "Lipoprotein lipase (LPL) deficiency: a new patient homozygote for the preponderant mutation Gly188Glu in the human LPL gene and review of reported mutations: 75 % are clustered in exons 5 and 6". Ann Genet 44 (1): 25-32. PMID 11334614. 19. ^ Crenon I, Foglizzo E, Kerfelec B, Verine A, Pignol D, Hermoso J, Bonicel J, Chapus C (1998). "Pancreatic lipase-related protein type I: a specialized lipase or an inactive enzyme". Protein Eng 11 (2): 135-42. doi:10.1093/protein/11.2.135. PMID 9605548. 20. ^ De Caro J, Carriere F, Barboni P, Giller T, Verger R, De Caro A (1998). "Pancreatic lipase-related protein 1 (PLRP1) is present in the pancreatic juice of several species". Biochim Biophys Acta 1387 (1-2): 331-41. PMID 9748646. 21. ^ Guo Z, Xu X (2005). "New opportunity for enzymatic modification of fats and oils with industrial potentials.". Org Biomol Chem 3 (14): 2615-9. doi:10.1039/b506763d. PMID 15999195. 22. ^ Gupta R, Gupta N, Rathi P (2004). "Bacterial lipases: an overview of production, purification and biochemical properties". Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 64 (6): 763-81. doi:10.1007/s00253-004-1568-8. PMID 14966663. 23. ^ Ban K, Kaieda M, Matsumoto T, Kondo A, Fukuda H (2001). "Whole cell biocatalyst for biodiesel fuel production utilizing Rhizopus oryzae cells immobilized within biomass support particles". Biochem Eng J 8 (1): 39-43. doi:10.1016/S1369-703X(00)00133-9. PMID 11356369.
[edit] External links
* MeSH Lipase * Selective Inhibitors of Monoacylglycerol Lipase as a Treatment for Neurological Disorders 2004-637 * UMich Orientation of Proteins in Membranes families/superfamily-90 - Phospholipases A2 * UMich Orientation of Proteins in Membranes families/superfamily-29 - Outer membrane phospholipase A * UMich Orientation of Proteins in Membranes families/superfamily-134 - Cytosolic phospholipase A2 and patatin * UMich Orientation of Proteins in Membranes families/superfamily-126 - Bacterial and mammalian phospolipases C * UMich Orientation of Proteins in Membranes families/superfamily-88 - α-toxin (a bacterial phospholipase C)
See also
* Triglyceride lipase * Phospholipase A * Phospholipase C * Alpha toxin * Peripheral membrane proteins
v • d • e Hydrolase: esterases (EC 3.1) 3.1.1: Carboxylic ester hydrolases Cholinesterase - Pectinesterase - 6-phosphogluconolactonase - PAF acetylhydrolase
Lipase (Gastric/Lingual, Pancreatic, Lysosomal, Hormone-sensitive, Endothelial, Hepatic, Lipoprotein, Monoacylglycerol, Diacylglycerol) Phospholipase (A1, A2, B) 3.1.2: Thioesterase Palmitoyl thioesterase - Ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 3.1.3: Phosphatase Alkaline phosphatase - Acid phosphatase (Prostatic)/Tartrate resistant acid phosphatase/Purple acid phosphatases - Nucleotidase - Glucose 6-phosphatase - Fructose 1,6-bisphosphatase - Calcineurin - Phosphoprotein phosphatase (PP2A) - OCRL - Pyruvate dehydrogenase phosphatase - Fructose 2,6-bisphosphatase - Protein tyrosine phosphatase - PTEN 3.1.4: Phosphodiesterase Autotaxin - Phospholipase (C, D) - Sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase - PDE1 - PDE2 - PDE3 - PDE5 3.1.6: Sulfatase Arylsulfatase B - Steroid sulfatase - Galactosamine-6 sulfatase - Arylsulfatase A - Iduronate-2-sulfatase - N-acetylglucosamine-6-sulfatase other Nuclease Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lipase" Categories: Enzymes | Peripheral membrane proteins
.
skytroll
|
|
|
Post by Administration on Jun 1, 2008 9:18:38 GMT -5
Bessie I hope you've had time to think this over and reconsider your decision. There are a lot of reasons why people don't post but it in no way means that nobody agrees with you.
A lot of readers are too cognitively impaired to be able to decipher much of what is written here, but they still read and try to understand. I don't feel there are two camps here, it's more like hundreds. Many of us believe a little from this one, a little from that one, and a little of our own theories (based on our individual suffering and symptoms), but we are all a team here and working together is going to be the eventual downfall of this disease. We just need everyone to stick together and we can make that happen!
|
|
|
Post by godsgrace on Jun 1, 2008 9:27:27 GMT -5
A lot of readers are too cognitively impaired to be able to decipher much of what is written here, but they still read and try to understand.
Admin... you said a mouthful here! There was a time that I was so ill when looking for my asnwers to CFS that I couldn't think straight. I could read the same information over and over and not understand a word of it!
I believe that it is no mistake that cognitive impairment is a symptom of so many illnesses...CFS/Lyme/GWI ect...
I think sometimes we forget how sick people are that are here in this forum
praying for us all
godsgrace
|
|
|
Post by toni on Jun 1, 2008 13:07:53 GMT -5
Friski, I definately agree with what you said about the religion part in comparing that to "what we feel/think" Morgellons is. This is JUST like religion in that sense. And what Admin said. So, the bottom line is imho, do we accept others that don't agree with what we feel/think this is...or do we not. Bessie, you seem to be a very nice person, and hopefully you can allow others to have their opinions too, because to not allow others to disagree with what you believe - is what prejudice is. And I don't mean that as strongly as it sounds, which I suppose "being fair" might be a better word, and trying to be open enough to know, we all have different thoughts and preferences. And it's all okay what we think this might be, cause no one knows for sure. My husbands cousin, who is a molecular scientist doesn't feel nano technology is involved. So you see...many many many opinions are needed until it's proven unanimously with all the scientists what this really is all about. We (all of us here) are only desperately searching for answers, and that helps us too, because we are in the same place, and here for each other, and that right now is what matters, because there is no way "WE" are going to be able to test our theories or anyone else's. We don't have that kind of equipment. So in the meantime, we learn...and stick together even though our differences.
|
|
|
Post by friskers on Jun 1, 2008 14:13:46 GMT -5
Very well said Toni I want to add that you said Bessie noone else has done what Dr Hildy is doing as far as helping us ect ect............. OMG what do you think Randy Wymore has been doing for FREE? Many TV interveiws and donating his spare time to study this disease for NO MONEY what so ever! If your looking for another message board I dont beleive going to find anything different there than here I hope you do stay Bessie because I do want to hear how your doing too with treatment from Dr Hildy .
|
|
|
Post by toni on Jun 1, 2008 15:26:47 GMT -5
Bessie, Yes that's a fact too as Friski said, we DO want and need to hear of your progress (no matter what doc or person you're seeing) that part (who you're a patient of isn't relative as to what you're doing and how you're doing (whether recommended by someone or something you've concocted up), as long as it's helping that's what matters. And that is very important to us all. We really are tied at the hip on this one, or hopefully we are, so please don't allow "opinions" clashing of what this or what this or that doc says get in OUR way, because none know concretely what this is or exactly what is (the final fix) to treatment. We're all in a "trial and error stage". And doctors, scientists, etc...let them be the opinionated ones...till they figure it out in it's entirety and all come to an agreement without doubt. Not us. We must stick together whether I like chocolate and you vanilla, okay?
|
|
doraisabel
Full Member
Have Faith in the LOrd, together we will get through this.
Posts: 203
|
Post by doraisabel on Jun 1, 2008 19:28:42 GMT -5
Bessie and Skytroll,
First of all Sky I think its great that you post so much info on this site. I just think that some ppeople are just not ready to accept what we have. Evidence is there everything sky posts backs up what Dr. Hildy has said.
I dont mean in any way to make anybody upset I trully believe that some of us just cant accept that the new technology has made it possible to create life forms that are artificial they are made to look just like the real thing. To the scientists that have taken science to this higher level this is a huge accomplishment and cannot see the harm that is being done.
Genetically motified foods is a perfect example of how they are using man made crap to feed it to us. Does anyone not think that the fact that we ingest these manmade ingredients will afftect us? Of course it will!
When I was first informed on what Morgellons was I went to see a priest. I was confused and very scared... He told me that he would look into it and call me back.. He said "Oh its real but it is also very evil and he said remember that evil feads off of fear.
|
|