|
Post by kammy on Apr 3, 2010 13:14:19 GMT -5
I was just reading Jeany's latest blog entry for today and I noticed this diagram and asked her about it: I asked her, 'you mean that if we PH up too much, the Eudragit casing expands in the gut (lower intestines) and if your PH is too low, it activates in the stomach?' Jeany says, 'yes, that's why it's important to keep our PH levels in the middle range.' (We probably need to buy PH strips and monitor our PH levels?) More on Eudragit to follow, to show how it got here... I just went over to Carnicom's site - I was going to email him but didn't see where to do that. Anyway, I see that he is about to spend some time on manipulating the PH levels to try to kill this. The above is an indication of what we're dealing with - it won't be possible.
|
|
|
Post by kammy on Apr 4, 2010 3:35:52 GMT -5
To Banny: I'm looking at this "Eudragit" above, (haven't finished looking yet) - to me; it's a prime example of what's happening. You see we have a sphere that is possibly man-made like is called the Eudragit, found in biopesticides that house baculovirus, this is a likely character involved. It was either created using the Chlamydia spore or Chlamydia is so powerful that it has taken over. Our Chlamydia-like sphere is a holder of 'things', apparently anything that comes along, it's like a vacuum, it incorporates it into the three-ringed circus that I am calling a baculoviral system. This can be good or bad, our pathogens are all wrapped up in a 'system' - you've heard that some of us aren't getting as many colds, as an example? Well, let's say the cold germ comes into our body and whoosh! - our Morgs grab it and incorporate it into the Morg Circus - so, we don't feel as sick. We get another fungus - whoosh! - it goes into the system, we don't feel the same effects as someone that has a fungal infection without Morgs, etc. What I think is happening is that we have a synthetic coated (your goo?) 'BACTERIAL-based' sphere that is housing fungi. At least three different base fungi (found in all of us) pops out of the bacterial sphere! Well, let's say that our white/clear, black and red/blue fungi that we're seeing all appear to be fungi or have the characteristics of it - it's possible that man has created a bacterial/fungal/parasitic/viral hybrid in his tinkering or his creations have morphed into it. (This would be a new genus of pathogens, not yet known, they are probably reluctant to create a bad lab experiment, man-made screw-ups section?) If you look at the progression study that I posted in my last blog article - this is a prime example of what I'm saying. That's what it looks like to me, bacteria-based housing fungi - anyone else - your opinion? morgellons1.wordpress.com/The photo you showed of the goo-like transparent hyphae came out of one of the Chlamydia-like spheres, that's how it was born. Dr. Abbott can't see this because - number 1 - it's not fungi necessarily (it emulates fungus) and 2 - it has to be present in his data bank system to match it to and 3 - he has to include it in his testing.
|
|
|
Post by kammy on Apr 4, 2010 6:11:27 GMT -5
What a Tangled Web We Weave So, they introduced biopesticides because they were finding that liquid chemicals were causing cancer? Biopesticides, a growing multi-million dollar business has incorporated such things as self-assembling fungal spheres, chicken feathers, plastic... on and on... which we're thinking leads to Morgellons Disease. Do I understand it correctly, when you buy 'organic' you're getting biopesticides vs. chemical spraying? If it is true that the chemtrails are spraying Morgellons-like pathogens, these pathogens are in our rain water and are even present in 'organic' food. 'Organic' might simply be another name for Morgellons pathogens? What if we are showing an 'allergy' to the biopesticides and the Government realized this? Could they stop spraying tomorrow, how would stopping affect the bug populations, well...
|
|
|
Post by kammy on Apr 4, 2010 6:31:04 GMT -5
What they didn't foresee was that the gnats and flies would get wrapped up in this system, infecting the frogs and bats, our friends; who aid us in eliminating pest insects - creating even more of an imbalance.
The gnats and flies are at the bottom of the food chain feeding those in the middle. If the chemtrails are for the purpose of insect control, they are infecting man at the top of the food chain. So, we're being infected from the bottom up and from the top down at the same time.
It appears that evident Morgellons is most likely a genetic predisposition as per Jeany's blog article. People with evident Morgellons are possibly 2% of the population? We are like the soldiers sacrificed in the war, a small number die for the benefit of many.
And mostly, what they have not seen - is that they are creating more pest insects, new strains by continuous spraying using this man-made 'magic' of how these pesticides operate - totally against the natural laws of how God intended life to be formed, unfortunately, we are the only ones who are seeing this.
We easily see that the frogs dying is related to an ancient fungus that is found from the ice melting, so easy for them to point to the global warming scapegoat as the culprit, I say this is propaganda to take our eyes off the real subjects - Morgellons Disease and what they have done to the planet. Ships moving the fungus around the world, we have already determined that the frog's chytrid fungus resembles one of our pathogens and something similar has incorporated into our disease. (two pages back in this thread this was shown and discussed)
|
|
|
Post by jeany on Apr 4, 2010 8:39:14 GMT -5
Here you can see the components of each Eudragit type:
Methacrylic copolymers Functional group: carboxylic acid R = COOH (anionic)
EUDRAGIT® L 100/S 100/L 100-55 (powders)
EUDRAGIT® L 30 D-55 / FS 30 D (aqueous dispersion 30%)
EUDRAGIT® L 12,5 / S 12,5 (organic solution 12.5%) Gastroresistant and enterosoluble
Aminoalkyl methacrylate copolymers Functional group: dimethyl aminoethyl R = COOCH2 CH2 N(CH3)2 (cationic)
EUDRAGIT® E 100 (granules) EUDRAGIT® E 12,5 (organic solution 12.5%)
EUDRAGIT® E PO (powder) Gastrosoluble and enteroresistent Methacrylate copolymers
Functional group: neutral esters R = COOCH3 or COOC4H9 (neutral) EUDRAGIT® NE 30 D / 40 D / NM 30 D (aqueous dispersion 30% / 40% polymer content) Insoluble, permeable; pH-independent
Ammonioalkyl methacrylate copolymers Functional group: trimethylammonioethyl R = COOCH2 CH2N+(CH3)3CI- (neutral)
EUDRAGIT® RL 100 (granules) EUDRAGIT® RL PO / RS PO (powders)
EUDRAGIT® RL 30 D / RS 30 D (aqueous dispersion 30%)
EUDRAGIT® RL 12,5 / RS 12,5 (organic solution 12.5%) Insoluble, permeable or dispersable; pH-independent
From above patent:
...polymeric encapsulating agent such as Eudragit L, Eudragit S, Eudragit L or S with Eudragit RL, Eudragit L or S with Eudragit RS
As you can see, several types are mixed or used in combination. We should look at the chemical compositions in order to see how these 'react' resp. what effect they have in human bodies.
Jeany
|
|
|
Post by jeany on Apr 4, 2010 9:54:43 GMT -5
epa.gov/pesticides/biopesticides/regtools/organic-pr-notice.htmLabel language on a pesticide product stating that the pesticide meets the NOP Rule criteria is not required for an organic producer to utilize a pesticide product which the producer and/or certifier ascertains meets the requirements of the NOP. Registrants of pesticide products are not required to add such NOP language to their products for the products to be used in organic agriculture. Use of products with NOP language does not modify the requirement that growers rely on their certifier for compliance with the NOP.
|
|
|
Post by ctbarb on Apr 4, 2010 10:01:17 GMT -5
Remember the French Scientist who discovered that Monsanto's RoundupReady products, that had been approved as "Safe" for use around our homes, on our foods, etc. actually was not as described?
Since M didn't have to disclose ALL of the components in its product, and the lesser 'inert ingredients' were not even on the label, found that when two of the components, one from the 'Active Ingredient' list, combined with one in the 'Inactive ingredient' list, made the product TOXIC!!!
Do you think for one second that those scientists/chemists who created RUR, had no clue what was happening? Then you DO believe in the Easter Bunny!
BTW, the French Scientist did survive....
|
|
|
Post by jeany on Apr 4, 2010 10:26:52 GMT -5
westernfarmpress.com/news_archive/biopesticides-crops-0917/CEO of Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc., based in Davis, Calif.....we think biopesticides can fill a lot of that gap,” she said, adding that the cost of developing a new chemical pesticide for registration under today’s environmental requirements runs $200 million and more. Biopesticides are less costly to bring to the market. Although the biopesticide market accounts for about only about $1 billion of the global pesticide market of $33 billion, she said she expects it to continue to grow rapidly and a huge biodiversity of sources remains untapped. By EPA’s definition, a biopesticide must have a non-toxic mode of action such as suffocation, dessication, starvation, or mating disruption. Examples that have become common in conventional agriculture include Bacillus thuringiensis, plant oils, and pheromones.
Natural products which have direct modes of action, such as those that act against an insect’s nervous system, are considered by EPA to be chemicals and not biopesticides.From patent: Insect control with multiple toxins - Inventor Hammock, Bruce D. (Davis, CA)morgellons2.wordpress.com/2010/03/30/bio-pesticides-the-cause-of-morgellons-disease/www.freepatentsonline.com/5756340.html....8. The recombinant baculovirus as in claim 1 or 3 wherein at least one toxin is a component of scorpion, wasp, snail, mite, or spider venom. ......For example, the method may use a combination of first recombinant pathogen that expresses a first neurotoxin and a second recombinant pathogen that expresses a second neurotoxin, or may use a single recombinant virus expressing a plurality (such as the first and second) of neurotoxins. The inventive method accelerates the rate of kill of pests by the virus. *so, WHY is this pesticide considered to be a BIO pesticide if it contains neurotoxins!?Is or was it approved by the EPA or not?Jeany
|
|
|
Post by kammy on Apr 5, 2010 5:39:36 GMT -5
It appears that farming is moving more and more toward biopesticides in the food industry. We are quickly moving away from the old, traditional liquid spraying methods: marronebioinnovations.com/biopesticides/section2.html"The general public, not just pesticide users, is quite possibly a driving force behind the rise in demand. The public is concerned about issues such as the potential for pollution and possible health hazards which include worker safety, bird toxicity, air pollution and surface and groundwater contamination. The public, whether right or wrong, perceives these issues to be related to the use of conventional pesticides. Biopesticides can be and many are approved for use in organic farming, the fastest growing segment of the food industry." Because we trust that the people in charge of managing our food supply, and trust that they are required to do their homework and make sure their claims are true - "Biopesticides generally affect only the target pest and closely related species. They pose little or no risk to most non-target organisms including birds, fish, beneficial insects and mammals." What do they mean by "generally"? Public opinion is pushing us right into the arms of Morgellons Disease. The people are being duped, once again - just like Al Gore telling you that Global Warming is a very bad thing happening - so they can justify chemtrailing you even more, they have lead you to think that you getting something that is beneficial, better for your health and we've seen the ingredients and how these pesticides are formulated in the patents? They can use modified insects and their chemical parts and fungi in a biopesticide and still claim it is 'natural' and 'organic'- afterall, these are found in nature. I don't know about you - but, I'd rather eat the chemically sprayed food and take my chances there, than to have foreign matter coming out of my skin and I do mean 'foreign'! Now we've made it to where we can't even find 'traditional' - old technique farm methods of pesticide use when purchasing our foods. Agroscience has probably changed everything with their tinkering to where we can't go back to old pesticide methods - even if we wanted to. We have to eat something. I say eat what you want, it doesn't really matter, just block all of this out and try to enjoy it, it's the best we can do unless we start growing our own in our own greenhouses using purified water and clean soil - not going to happen.
|
|
|
Post by kammy on Apr 5, 2010 9:35:32 GMT -5
I just made this post over in the Lymie thread and it got me to thinking:
"We're suspecting that all of the insects have become infected by the Morg chemistry that's in nature, why would the tick be left out? Has anyone looked at the blood of a tick or cultured some to see if it has or grows the Morgellons artifacts? I also think you can see this by placing a fresh, dead tick in a Petri Dish, the white fuzzy 'fungus' should be seen shortly.
I'm thinking that the difference in our diseases is possibly that the Lymies have been in contact with a Morgellons Tick and we haven't."
Theoretically - any biting insect should be able to transmit the Morgellons pathogens? I'm hoping some of you will kill/catch a variety of insects this summer and microscopically examine them to prove this theory?
What ARE the Morgellons pathogens, exactly? Well... we're still sorting that out. If we went and purchased several of the biopesticides and added water to them and put them in a Petri Dish, which is what needs to be done... we should see some of our artifacts?
We believe that the BASE of the Morgellons pathogens are everywhere - worldwide, in the waters of China, inside of every insect, in our paper products, our wine, in most all humans - how did they get there?... they have to come from some massive spraying campaign such as chemtrails, I don't believe that biopesticide use has spread them so quickly, maybe a combination... These pathogens ALONE are not necessarily pathogenic to humans, if this were true - we'd all show evident signs.
What has happened to cause some of us to become evident and others not? I'm saying that the combination of a baculoviral expression system and all that it entails as found in a biopesticide and the combination of chemtrail chemistry are the major players inside evident Morgelllons. These separate fields of science are not looking at the other to see what their combination brings.
What does the mouse from my rain water/moldy basement that got into my corn chips, that died in the bag because it couldn't get out - have to do with Morgellons Disease?
Our friend, the mouse, which has been used in lab experiments to show human disease, will eventually show our disease to scientists. Take a feral mouse, that is drinking the ground/rain water and feed it corn chips and no water and it will die shortly - it will be consumed by a white fuzzy 'fungus', and it's body riddled with the baculoviral system cones - nodules of 'fungi' growing roots will be seen, it will turn from white to black in fungus color and eventually be covered in fungus. The feral mouse is in contact with the chemtrail chemicals in large amounts from the rain water, especially those in basements - it does not necessarily die or appear sick - just as most humans don't.
What are the base artifacts of the chemtrails, we may never know - we can look at Carnicom's data to see, however - he didn't take microscopic photos of the chemtrail fuzz, that I know of? Even in the people who are non-evident - he is showing the 'Chlamydia-like' spore. We are seeing the Chlamydia-like spore in all the other places, therefore, we can assume it is coming from the chemtrails.
If Morgellons is a combination of chemtrails and biopesticides, and if everyone has the chemtrail chemicals inside of them and everyone should be evident when they ate corn chips or foods with baculovirus vectors - we know this isn't true, there has to be an additional vector or vectors that causes evident Morgellons.
What are at the base of these two, fungi/bacteria and insect dna - that with the addition of a bite from a Morgellons infected insect such as in Lyme Disease or contact with an additional diseased carrying bird or mouse, etc. and possibly another fungal stress, along with our genetics - are the other possible vectors that cause us to become evident.
"Theoretically - any biting insect should be able to transmit the Morgellons pathogens?"
What does this statement mean if the insect pathogens are coming from chemtrails? If humans are already infected and the insects are infected with the same... how can they transmit what we already have?
Well, they can transmit their 'others', and a different variation of the original theme of how the scientist thought or didn't think that the chemtrail/biopesticide combination would operate. What if what I'm saying is true - all the scale insects and even the ticks are now perpetuating within a 'magical' new life form system and one of those bites us? Did they look into this before setting their products loose on us, where can we find the data on this?
I believe if we lab studied the tick, we would find that Morgellons is the originator disease, the newest version of Lymes Disease is a result of the Morgellons pathogens along with the tick's other modified pathogens. Lymes was just Lymes until Morgellons.
We can intelligently look at Lymes Disease for clues. What is it that causes their disease to be evident, might not the same be true for the Morgie? As far as I know, no one has pitted the tick against the mosquito to see what the differences are - what their pathogens/artifacts look like... it could be that a Lymie has been bitten by a tick and a Morgie got bit by a mosquito? Or the Lymie got bitten by a tick or mosquito and the Morgie has had close contact with fungus gnats. I suspect the fungus gnats which are now probably mostly our GM Morgie gnat, are making the bats and frogs sick, and I noticed that I got sicker when they were in my environment, if they are making the bats and frogs sick - causing them to grow white, 'fuzzy' fungus - then why shouldn't they have some ill effect on humans?
|
|
|
Post by kammy on Apr 6, 2010 4:53:24 GMT -5
THEY'RE BACKKK!... Germany is probably equalivent in climate to upper New York, it is just now getting warm and the trees are starting to bud, the days are still cool. Jeany found this amber web and a flea-sized critter in the laundry basket in the laundry room. This baby below had just hatched and was just about to fly away. This basket contained belts and shoes from my house that she was going to wash before we put them in the closet. It is a baby fungus gnat. I waited a day before photographing it, I can't tell if it's a Morg Gnat or not? Here we go... another year of gnats : As a joke: I think it fell out of Jeany's head and not out of my ear - as she's the one in the laundry room the most. ;D
|
|
|
Post by kammy on Apr 6, 2010 6:58:44 GMT -5
The Bad Morgie Ear I need to put this photo over on the "Bad Morgie Ear" thread... this is what I've been talking about. You know I've been doctoring my ear!... You can't see what I can feel - my ear is just like the caterpillar that's being eaten by the baculoviral system, that's how I know what's going on. I don't think most people's ears are on the same level as mine?: The whole pinna is filled with crystals, fibers and spheres. There is very little topically that affects it. The ear specialists gave me a cortizone cream to treat it. The slits are where the ear has naturally split open to release the 'debris'. I wanted to document this - my ear looked twice as bad yesterday. Jeany found this cream that I put on it last night - this is a drastic improvement, I wanted to show you a before and after, I believe this salve is doing something? I'll let you know.
|
|
|
Post by kammy on Apr 6, 2010 7:21:37 GMT -5
Yeah, they will have to cut off that left ear, I'm sure. Let's not forget the right one, it's more internal - just on the inside, slightly down into the canal, too: Yeah... I'm "DOP".... right!....
|
|
|
Post by Sidney on Apr 6, 2010 7:54:13 GMT -5
How any doctor can look at these ears and do nothing is beyond me. I'm very glad you posted these images, Kammy, as it was impossible for me to imagine what your ears were doing without actually visualizing them!
What in the world?
Thank you.
|
|
|
Post by kammy on Apr 6, 2010 10:30:43 GMT -5
I don't know, Sid, how they can get away with this? I can tell you that we are suffering. Our lesions have some sort of numbing agent, I suspect the wasp/scorpion venom to paralyze us as we are parasitized just exactly as the baculoviral system is supposed to work. If this wasn't in the mix... and because we aren't yelling and screaming in pain, we don't get the deserved attention? Here's a closer up of the pinna part, you can see the black specks under the skin: My ear is reacting almost the same as this below: [/img] Caterpillar being consumed by a Baculovirus[/center]
|
|
|
Post by toni on Apr 6, 2010 10:49:09 GMT -5
Kammy, Nice pictures! (of you both) The ear, OMG. I know I'm going to sound like (my mix) works for everything, but, IF....and ONLY IF you try this "exactly" I believe this will RID your problem. [glow=red,2,300]If you alter the mix at all, it will NOT work.[/glow] I am saying this at the risk of sounding like a "knowitall" and that I hope is not the case. But, I HAVE HAD the same looking crap "behind my ears". The milk ( 2% added to PLAIN white yogurt) just enough to make it nice and smooth, like a lotion texture would be. (just stir them together) not too much milk or it's too runny. I am saying this (because I WANT and HOPE to help you rid that crap on your ear forever). Nothing I tried "for behind my ear" worked. Trust me when I say, I have bought thousands of dollars of "topicals" of all kinds, prescription and non prescription, and NOTHING worked. But...the milk and yogurt mix did. Whether we understand "why or not" is really irrelevant isn't it? It works. That's what matters. I could see if I were saying try something dangerous, like gasoline, or turpentine, or whatever or the script creams etc...but we're talkin MILK and PLAIN yogurt mixed together and applied thickly and LEFT ON all day long, for a minimum of 4 days. Of course shower with an antibacterial soap (dish soap like Palmolive or Dawn that says antibacterial on the label) will work great....and kill germs. Then immediately after your showers every day, reapply the yogurt mix thick with clean fingers, and leave it on. ( please know, I am soooo not telling you what you should do). I am ONLY saying this because IF you give this ONLY 4 days minimum to a week actually is best for just about TOTAL relief of applying this mix, you WILL get such improvement you'll be so thrilled you won't understand it just as I am blown away by how this has saved me too. Isn't it worth "really just one weeks try"? It's not a dangerous mix to apply topically. It's just milk and yogurt. I almost erased this post, because I sound like such a "pusher" and broken record of this mix, but for one reason: It's safe and it will help you. Okay...I'll shut up now.
|
|
|
Post by kammy on Apr 6, 2010 11:12:53 GMT -5
Thx, Toni... it's ok - I'll keep trying. Of course, I've tried the yogurt/milk mixture recently and it doesn't phase it. You see, how can I say this?... it doesn't feel nor act like a real ear anymore - when I touch it - it feels like it's made up of strands of fiber with the spheres/crystals mixed in with some rubber material that is appearing to be an ear. When I touch the pinna at the top, it constricts as if it has a mind to think that my fingers are going to bring it harm, it tightens up/constricts automatically, it's very weird. I will have to eventually inject the ear or use DMSO to carry the medicine to the inside part. This part of the ear gets the least blood, so if you take medicines - most of the medicine goes somewhere else and topicals don't go deep enough - this is internalized. And, it's the entire ear, even though it's not evident - the fiber network goes all the way to the scalp and possibly under the scalp, too? Why do you think I'm out here raising hail, non-stop, I've lost my home and about to lose an ear to this disease? I want some answers! lol
I'd say your milk/yogurt mix is a good thing - for folks to use it, it's probably beneficial to most.
|
|
|
Post by Lynn on Apr 6, 2010 12:03:28 GMT -5
Hi
Has anyone tried cold pressed coconut oil on ears. Also do oil pulling to pull stuff out of the head area. Try to get this stuff away from the head as much as possible. Also would not hurt to take 2 TB of coconut oil a day internally. Takes about two weeks to see the effects.
Oil pulling start out with just 3 minutes and slowly work up to 10 and than up to 20. You just hold the coconut oil in mouth and spit in garbage can when done.
Lot of healing propertys in Cold presses coconut oil and fights bacteria and fungas.
In Light Lynn
|
|
|
Post by kammy on Apr 6, 2010 12:09:44 GMT -5
Hi Has anyone tried cold pressed coconut oil on ears. Also do oil pulling to pull stuff out of the head area. Try to get this stuff away from the head as much as possible. Also would not hurt to take 2 TB of coconut oil a day internally. Takes about two weeks to see the effects. Oil pulling start out with just 3 minutes and slowly work up to 10 and than up to 20. You just hold the coconut oil in mouth and spit in garbage can when done. Lot of healing propertys in Cold presses coconut oil and fights bacteria and fungas. In Light Lynn Thx, Lynn! I haven't tried the oil pulling yet...that's a good idea... yeah, my head rings non-stop now... I have tried long-term coconut oil, not sure if it was cold-pressed? got it at a health food store in Atlanta, still have some... might try it again too.
|
|
|
Post by kammy on Apr 6, 2010 12:32:25 GMT -5
|
|