|
Post by Sidney on Apr 20, 2010 10:12:33 GMT -5
The website is gone. I heard the people fell onto really hard times and feel sad for them.
Not saying I supported them or even paid much attention to them at all, but another family's life turned to crap thanks to this disease.
|
|
|
Post by Lynn on Apr 20, 2010 10:39:32 GMT -5
Thats so sad. I hope they pull through. Wish they would post some on the forums, but if they owe people money for the book they bought and did not get a down load they may be embarrassed about it and remain silent. I really hope they are not being sued by that CEO of some nanotech co. Thats all they need at this point.
In Light Lynn
|
|
|
Post by Sidney on Apr 20, 2010 11:46:14 GMT -5
Thank you, Torpedolynn. In fact, a lawsuit seems to be behind the closing of the website. As I posted earlier, I paid little attention to the site, certainly didn't order their book, but as human beings whose quality of life went down the toilet as a result of this disease, and assuming they have children, my heart aches for them. This is a general Google Search and it does appear they may be in some deep Caca. tinyurl.com/y57plhjI copied and pasted this "interesting" sounding site, but when I tried to open it I got a 404 Error. Still, the wording suggests Big Pharma was out to get 'em. Big Pharma Threatens Nanotransformation.com with Lawsuit Feb 14, 2010 ... Gary Mezo, CEO of Nanobiotech Inc. has threatened health news website Nanotransformation.com with a lawsuit for using the word nanobacteria ... nanotransformation.com/nanotransformation/big-pharma-threatens-nanotransformation-com-with-lawsuit.html - Cached
|
|
|
Post by kammy on Apr 21, 2010 10:16:44 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by kmarie on Apr 21, 2010 13:14:07 GMT -5
I googled for BLOGS on this article and found this:------------------------------------------------ Big Pharma Threatens Nanotransformation.com with Lawsuit Feb 14, 2010 by SungazerGary Mezo, CEO of Nanobiotech Inc. has threatened health news website Nanotransformation.com with a lawsuit for using the word “nanobacteria” in a recent nanobacteria news article. The legal threat was presented in a ... nanotransformation.com/ - More results from NanoTransformation, GMO Diseases Morgellons ... - References ( It would seems to me that Sungazer is the author of this blog ) ---------------------------------------------------------------- This information would only show up when I googled "BLOGS". tinyurl.com/2dltah4When I googled for "NEWS": There are not any results. tinyurl.com/243kxmd------------------------------------------------- Does anyone here know who Sungazer is? Does anyone know what STATinternet website is? I found some strange stuff on that site regarding nanotransformation.com: nanotransformation.com evaluated about 4800$ USDWe estimate the value of nanotransformation.com according to the number of visitors during the history. It is located in -,- ,and IP Address is 70.33.208.60. It has about 840 unique users every day. ALL STOP Productsshop.qbased.com/SearchResults.asp?Cat=36&Click=90202&gclid=CKrkyfWtmKECFRP_iAod6lm2Qwand this Link: www.naturalginesis.com/?gclid=COWtwt6umKECFRE8gwodJjJ8wQThese links were on that page with others and I sure don't understand. Are they associated? Is nanotransformation up for sale or are they being sued? How do those websites like ALL STOP relate to nanotransformation.com? EDITING this post: I failed to leave the link for this information. www.statinternet.com/domain/nanotransformation.com
|
|
|
Post by friskers on Apr 21, 2010 14:44:06 GMT -5
Kmarie I dont have many answers for you but I do know the worth of a site is usually just an estimate and may not be accurate at all. There are many sites that evaluate the worth of a site and they can vary in ranges of thousands of dollars . I do remember them being hassled several months ago and threatened legally for using a nanoword ,it was on the comments section and I thought they had complied to their wishes back then and removed the offending word. i dont know anything more than that, sorry!
|
|
|
Post by kmarie on Apr 21, 2010 15:22:58 GMT -5
Friskers and all, I was not interested in the "worth" of the site. My point is that I can find no valid NEWS source about it's closing due to lawsuit. Something remembered from "posted comments" on the nanotransformation site does make it Real News. The point I was trying to make is about this website: www.statinternet.com/domain/nanotransformation.comStatinternet lists several other websites that possibly might be associated with nanotransformation.com Does anyone know what this STATinternet site is for and what it's purpose is? Thank you!
|
|
|
Post by Sidney on Apr 21, 2010 15:39:48 GMT -5
This is the sum-total of what I know about their site. They're broke. The guy did threaten them with a big lawsuit over the use of the word which as Kammy pointed out is pure bull$shyte.....but whatever the case my understanding is they are broke. If they're broke they can't afford to keep up the monthly cost of the website, assuming they were paying for the space. Whatever, it makes my blood boil. Did you notice the arti cle by the female veterinarian who had Morgellons? (and is supposedly cured.) Apparently she had been involved or at least communicating with the MRF at one time. I do not mean "involved" meaning a Board member, but it appears she was at least in touch with the MRF as they are mentioned. www.morgellonsquestions.com/I am a Doctor of Veterinary Medicine who suffered from this condition for years. Dr. Jacqueline Brewer DVM
|
|
|
Post by kmarie on Apr 21, 2010 16:00:18 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Sidney on Apr 21, 2010 17:11:49 GMT -5
Could Statinternet just be one of the places on the web that sells Domain names like GoDaddy?
I guess you could call or email them and ask what their "business" is or what they "do."
I sure don't know, but THIS bothers me a lot.
The first product being offered is INFORMATION and CARING SUPPORT. Dr. Brewer will answer any of your questions about Morgellons Personally! The fee is $98 per consultation which we hope will help support further research.
If I wanted to start a list of people who are charging big bucks for consultation who are not LEGALLY entitled to do so, I could come up with half a dozen in no time at all...probably.
It STINKS! M.D. and D.O.'s can legally charge for phone consults, but anyone else doing it, and I mean ANYONE.....man, I'd go after their sorry butts before you could say Jack Schitt.
|
|
|
Post by lilsissy on Apr 21, 2010 22:00:11 GMT -5
Sad,
Money makes it all go round or not hey?
jen
|
|
|
Post by Sidney on Apr 21, 2010 22:39:23 GMT -5
KMarie wrote: I'm sorry, I don't see any relevance from that website to our topic now and today. ----------------------------------------------------------- The point I was trying to make is about this website: www.statinternet.com/domain/nanotransformation.comStatinternet lists several other websites that possibly might be associated with nanotransformation.com The relevance to the Nanotransformations site is ONLY that it happened to be on the same site. Lawsy.
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Apr 22, 2010 1:48:47 GMT -5
the guy threatening the lawsuit? lifeboat.com/ex/bios.gary.s.mezoWhat a toad! It is all about Biotech and the way he describes the n ba. is just like what we have. changes shape, and Kajander we have always thought well of, after all he called it that himself. Doesn't make sense, or........... .....", they are pleomorphic meaning that they assume different life forms for different phases and activities of their lives, they can go dormant in a self-made calcium shell, they are saprophytic in humans, they are "the toughest of bugs" — resistant to being killed both In-Vitro and In-Vivo and they are the cause of many human diseases.".................... Sounds like our silent super buggie! skytroll
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Apr 22, 2010 1:56:36 GMT -5
Shall we call them Leptospires? ABSTRACT Leptospires exist as saprophytic organisms that are aquatic or as pathogens that are able to survive in water. Leptospirosis is transmitted to humans through environmental surface waters contaminated by the urine of mammals, usually rodents, which are chronically infected by pathogenic strains. The ecology of Leptospira spp. prompted us to evaluate if these spirochaetes were able to form biofilms. This study investigated the characteristics of biofilm development by both saprophytic and pathogenic Leptospira species using microscopic examinations and a polystyrene plate model. Biofilms were formed preferentially on glass and polystyrene surfaces. Electron microscopic images showed cells embedded in an extracellular matrix. The formation of such a biofilm is consistent with the life of saprophytic strains in water and may help pathogenic strains to survive in environmental habitats and to colonize the host.mic.sgmjournals.org/cgi/content/full/154/5/1309Wondered why DeFuzzio used the word "saphrophytic" sounds fungal, forming phyto, hypae, etc......from inorganic surfaces etc... skytroll
|
|
|
Post by bessie on Apr 22, 2010 8:59:46 GMT -5
Some may remember Deanna Odom...she was interviewed by Newsweek in 2008. This is her website: ahealthyintent.com/ and there are links to the article there. To the point - she has been symptom-free for a few years, and believes that the controversial nanobacteria is responsible for M. One of the products she used/uses and sells is Calci-clear, which claims to break down the calcium envelope that protects the nanobac. She was (maybe still is?) working with the scientists who discovered it and went on to develop Calci-clear. At one time there was a test for it, but I don't know the status of that now. It was based out of Finland but I can't recall the details of it. As far as using the term "nano" - well, that is just stupid. What about the iPod by that name? The prefex "nano" refers only to size - one billionth of a meter - suffixes like "technology" or "particle" give a bit more information but is not definitive. As far as the term "nanotransformation", the closest I could find (other than the website) is an article discussing the transformation of nanoparticles: meetings.aps.org/Meeting/MAR10/Event/124343The term "nano-transformation" (hypenated) is used to describe a process and is not a patented or copyrighted brand name. Bessie
|
|
|
Post by Jill on Apr 22, 2010 9:05:48 GMT -5
Robert Folk, the 'Father of Nanobacteria', found the nanobacteria in carbonate rocks. serc.carleton.edu/microbelife/topics/nanobes/index.htmlFair use Excerpt: Nanobacteria are the smallest cell-walled organisms on Earth, the existence of which is the center of great controversy. A nanobacterium is by definition one billionth of a meter in diameter (1/10 the size of bacteria), leaving some to question whether or not an organism of this size has enough room to house necessary cell components such as DNA, RNA, and plasmids. end excerpt www.physorg.com/news128167633.htmlFair use Excerpt: That’s just one piece of evidence against living nanobacteria named in a recent study by Jan Martel of Chang Gung University in Taiwan and John Ding-E Young from The Rockefeller University in New York, which was published in PNAS. Martel and Young have studied healthy human blood serum that contains what they call “nanobacteria-like particles” (NLP), composed of the compound calcium carbonate (CaCO3), or limestone. The researchers performed a series of experiments showing that the tiny particles contain no traces of DNA or RNA, and suggest that their formation can be explained by non-biological means. “We believe that this study provides substantive proof that nanobacteria are not living entities,” Young told PhysOrg.com. “Some previous studies have hinted that this is the case, but have not provided a chemical composition or formulation that could explain the nanobacteria phenomenon in its entirety.” end excerpt Because nanobacteria has been found in rock and limestone- present since the beginning of time, why then would these nanobacteria suddenly become purveyors of all manner of emerging disease? Study the 'big picture'. What have we been doing to the environment over the past 50 + years? I agree to what is proven. The nanobacteria composed of the compound calcium carbonate (limestone) per above, are found in blood. They do not create calcite- that is what they are sourced fromen.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calcite That these calcium carbonate or nanobacteria can form kidney stones (apatite in kidney stones) and cause heart issues - is to be expected. The body was not built for calcite. The calcium carbonate (nanobacteria) can eat through limestone. Soft tissue then would be an easy target. Calcite was found at Suny in the Morgellons specimens: Thanks to Mark Darrah and Dr Citovsky www.morgellons.org/suny.htm Fair use Excerpt: Image 1: White Fiber – Calcite covered End excerpt The better question then is how do these previously benign nanobacterias become airborne and therefore inhaled by all things living?
It is that mechanism that is the real issue. It is my belief that the VOCs/pesticides in the soil, water and air cycle (they become airborn (gas) then once more return to the soil/water), will provide the answer to the mechanism. What is found in soil ? Rocks/limestone and the nanobacteria- The remediation efforts are, in part, contributing to that problem by adding various bacterias to include Agrobacterium ti into the soil/water in order to attempt to neutralize the damage. I am working on it on the Pathogenic Candida Albicans thread.
|
|
|
Post by victory3 on Apr 22, 2010 9:21:18 GMT -5
To clarify.....no supplements available in response to Bessie's post about Deanna Odom & her site: ahealthyintent.com/
|
|
|
Post by Jill on Apr 22, 2010 9:36:42 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by mfromcanada on Apr 22, 2010 10:16:15 GMT -5
Check out lifeboats current activities: CURRENT PROGRAMS? ? AIShield AsteroidShield BioShield InternetShield LifeShield Bunkers NanoShield ScientificFreedomShield SecurityPreserver Space Habitats MORE PROGRAMS AlienShield AntimatterShield BioPreserver BlackHoleShield ClimateShield CommPreserver EnergyPreserver GammaRayShield InfoPreserver LifePreserver NeuroethicsShield NuclearShield ParticleAcceleratorShield PersonalityPreserver SeedPreserver SunShield
|
|
|
Post by victory3 on Apr 22, 2010 17:27:08 GMT -5
Thank you, Jill, for referring to hearthealthyworld.com that has the Calci-clear in stock. Thanks again Bessie, for the info. Sorry for short earlier post. Just figured out how to quote somebody's post. (Can't take straterra ) Some may remember Deanna Odom...she was interviewed by Newsweek in 2008. This is her website: ahealthyintent.com/ and there are links to the article there. To the point - she has been symptom-free for a few years, and believes that the controversial nanobacteria is responsible for M. One of the products she used/uses and sells is Calci-clear, which claims to break down the calcium envelope that protects the nanobac. She was (maybe still is?) working with the scientists who discovered it and went on to develop Calci-clear. At one time there was a test for it, but I don't know the status of that now. It was based out of Finland but I can't recall the details of it. As far as using the term "nano" - well, that is just stupid. What about the iPod by that name? The prefex "nano" refers only to size - one billionth of a meter - suffixes like "technology" or "particle" give a bit more information but is not definitive. As far as the term "nanotransformation", the closest I could find (other than the website) is an article discussing the transformation of nanoparticles: meetings.aps.org/Meeting/MAR10/Event/124343The term "nano-transformation" (hypenated) is used to describe a process and is not a patented or copyrighted brand name. Bessie
|
|