|
Post by ibzahp on Dec 11, 2010 17:06:15 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by 22122agin on Dec 11, 2010 17:45:32 GMT -5
The CDC is good at what likely they were created for: epidemics of a viral nature, bacterial nature, parasite nature limited to things like malaria with examples of the most obvious, something that is contageous like HIV that is a risk for the entire population without regard to race if exposed. They are also in charge of classifying the hazardness of an organism rating its dangerousness and what kind of protection must be had for working for such things in research. I have CFS for over 20 years and alternative doctors do the treating not mainstream doctors. That is what it is and that is the way our health system is set up. Traditional medicine is good for treating the breaking a bone and such things. Conditions such as MS and other such conditions are left out of mix likely because they are not contageous risking everyone. Likely it is not something you don't know already. New things that don't fall into fungal, parasitic in an obvious way affecting anyone, and other such things I have mentioned will take a lot of fussing to get them to look up and take notice. Look what AIDs research people had to do to get it on the map. Slow viruses would never have been heard about if it was not for Mad Cow Disease. Then it gets perhaps the CDC's attention. If you get my drift. 22122
|
|
|
Post by awareseattle on Dec 12, 2010 17:46:55 GMT -5
Possibly the CDC is not funded enough to do everything that is needed. And, a new branch of disease study should be funded and opened to study chronic, slow growing diseases.
|
|
|
Post by 22122agin on Dec 12, 2010 22:45:59 GMT -5
Aware in seattle I wish it was true: see below www.prohealth.com/library/showarticle.cfm?libid=15783They have us in the psychiatric box with a damaged childhood. See a psychiatrist would be their response according to this CDC study above. Sounding a bit like a similar diagnosis to DOP. Just make us all crazy. If we felt we really had a psychiatric illness, we could get better funding actually but not to prove anything biological and if one tried in that venue, well they would be bucking upstream but at least it would be studied more. 22122
|
|