|
Post by vcromwell on Feb 23, 2012 0:13:55 GMT -5
www.mirm.pitt.edu/news/article.asp?qEmpID=75self assembling nanocarpet that changes colors... yet morgellons is imagined it's not possible.. what's interesting too me is that nanotech is a new industry where scientists are trying everything and anything to make their mark. These are the people that can identify what Morgs really is yet nobody tries to get them to help. Look who is working on this project.. the U.S. Army Research Office, Petroleum scientists, unix. of pittsburg. Yet we are delusional. I can't help but be extremely angry. it's one thing to have this and another for your loved ones and friends to tell you you're crazy... I can careless what the idiot dermatologists say. they are skin doctors and this has nothing to do with skin other than it creates sores.. this is new age biotech.. I wish I knew more about just what it is and who created it. If I found out who created it, man would I take action.. this is no joke and is destroying many lives... to be ridiculed the way we are is just disgusting. I do believe we are going to find out who's responsible. Sadly it may take 20 years.. but we will and when we do.. if you think the CIA tortures with water boarding.. that will look like play time with what people will do to those that made this mess. Honestly, I can't say I would say I would be sorry to see that. Someone out there knows what this is... How do they possibly live with themselves while knowing we are suffering? Makes me sick.
|
|
|
Post by ginna898 on Feb 23, 2012 2:07:24 GMT -5
Agree with you.
CDC didn't even put together an 'impressive' study report.
If it were to be graded by a teacher ==== POOR, very very POOR I give it an "F".
and it's totally untrue.
Does the CDC normally test hair samples for DRUGS? Is that a common practice for other CDC studies?.... or was it one of the 'requirements' for the morg study ?
|
|
|
Post by elizabeth67 on Feb 23, 2012 4:43:14 GMT -5
Exactly. I can not believe that they don't know. Too late for that, the one who started this is dead. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poly(methyl_methacrylate)History The first acrylic acid was created in 1843. Methacrylic acid, derived from acrylic acid, was formulated in 1865. The reaction between methacrylic acid and methanol results in the ester methyl methacrylate. The German chemists Fittig and Paul discovered in 1877 the polymerization process that turns methyl methacrylate into polymethyl methacrylate. In 1933 the German chemist Otto Röhm patented and registered the brand name PLEXIGLAS. In 1936 the first commercially viable production of acrylic safety glass began. During World War II acrylic glass was used for submarine periscopes, windshields, canopies, and gun turrets for airplanes.
|
|
|
Post by Lynn on Feb 23, 2012 10:58:58 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by ibzahp on Feb 23, 2012 14:05:07 GMT -5
great find Homeworld. i agree, they did a lousy job and then to top it off-instead of saying more research is required, they hung us out to dry. No way to put a happy face on it
|
|
|
Post by elizabeth67 on Mar 7, 2012 5:53:41 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Lynn on Mar 7, 2012 10:45:54 GMT -5
Hi Elizabeth
By the article are they admitting they have purposely put this stuff in animals and found them to have disease and then now they are trying to develop a tool that will detect the nano particles in the animals so that they might make them better. I notice they did not use the word cure. I have a horrible time understanding what I read.
In Light Lynn/TorpedoLynn
|
|
|
Post by elizabeth67 on Mar 8, 2012 14:37:26 GMT -5
Hi Lynn.
Some of the literature is abracadabra to m too. But it is a good thing that they are trying to get a clear(er) picture/ recognize nanotoxicity.
|
|