Post by homeworld on Dec 27, 2011 9:42:19 GMT -5
...I find it odd that I repeatedly observe accelerated fiber
growth in water treated with MMS OR H2O2.
..here is a folder with a few pics from a 10 day test involving
MMS added to distilled water.
curezone.com/ig/f.asp?f=2793
The distilled water came from the at home distiller which
does NOTHING to remove the tiny [~100 micron] particles
that sprout the fibers; they just ride the steam through the
condensing coil and end up in the finished product.
Tiny fibers in the tap water do the same thing.
Despite being boiled into steam and the boiling process
taking up to 5-6 hours to compete a gallon, the particles and
fibers seem to be quite "healthy" and grow vigorously in the
"clean water" tank.
In the "whiteraft" close-up, a fiber is clearly seen at the bottom
center of the pic growing out of the particle "raft".
When the particle "raft" is stained, it is much easier to see
the huge number of particles involved. They are forming the
same sort of accretions that are constantly in my urine.
The same "particles forming "rafts"/sheets"/"scabs" is happening
in the lesions. My scabs are formed of countless particles clumping together into structures, just as they are doing in the
distilled water.
The chlorine dioxide test strip indicates that sufficient MMS
remained in the water after ten days to be effective IF the
MMS has any effect on the particles/fibers. The MMS may have an effect, but it is clear that it is NOT "killing" or inhibiting growth.
On the contrary, it appears to be feeding them.
The distilled water started out with microscopic particles, some
of which are barely visible with the unaided eye if brightly illuminated. After ten days, clumps of several millimeters are visible...in addition to ~half millimeter pigmented gels.
I suspect that adding oxygen [with MMS or hydrogen peroxide]
is feeding "something" that uses oxygen to make fibers and gels.
[...if an obligate aerobe that makes cellulose [A. xylinum] is
involved, and is "force fed" oxygen, would it not demonstrate
accelerated cellulose production?
Not saying that this is happening, but the behavior of the particles is ...suspicious.
*as a side note, I was routinely removing clear fibers in the
80-115 mm range from urine and stool about a year ago; before
I wised up to the importance of maintaining a neutral pH.
Since making an effort to keep the urine pH from crashing to the mid 5's; and keeping it somewhere near 7, the absurdly long fibers
and large fiber tangles are not being produced. I find it interesting to read that the fiber production of A. xylinus is inhibited at pH's above 7.0. Maybe just a coincidence..but
maybe not.
growth in water treated with MMS OR H2O2.
..here is a folder with a few pics from a 10 day test involving
MMS added to distilled water.
curezone.com/ig/f.asp?f=2793
The distilled water came from the at home distiller which
does NOTHING to remove the tiny [~100 micron] particles
that sprout the fibers; they just ride the steam through the
condensing coil and end up in the finished product.
Tiny fibers in the tap water do the same thing.
Despite being boiled into steam and the boiling process
taking up to 5-6 hours to compete a gallon, the particles and
fibers seem to be quite "healthy" and grow vigorously in the
"clean water" tank.
In the "whiteraft" close-up, a fiber is clearly seen at the bottom
center of the pic growing out of the particle "raft".
When the particle "raft" is stained, it is much easier to see
the huge number of particles involved. They are forming the
same sort of accretions that are constantly in my urine.
The same "particles forming "rafts"/sheets"/"scabs" is happening
in the lesions. My scabs are formed of countless particles clumping together into structures, just as they are doing in the
distilled water.
The chlorine dioxide test strip indicates that sufficient MMS
remained in the water after ten days to be effective IF the
MMS has any effect on the particles/fibers. The MMS may have an effect, but it is clear that it is NOT "killing" or inhibiting growth.
On the contrary, it appears to be feeding them.
The distilled water started out with microscopic particles, some
of which are barely visible with the unaided eye if brightly illuminated. After ten days, clumps of several millimeters are visible...in addition to ~half millimeter pigmented gels.
I suspect that adding oxygen [with MMS or hydrogen peroxide]
is feeding "something" that uses oxygen to make fibers and gels.
[...if an obligate aerobe that makes cellulose [A. xylinum] is
involved, and is "force fed" oxygen, would it not demonstrate
accelerated cellulose production?
Not saying that this is happening, but the behavior of the particles is ...suspicious.
*as a side note, I was routinely removing clear fibers in the
80-115 mm range from urine and stool about a year ago; before
I wised up to the importance of maintaining a neutral pH.
Since making an effort to keep the urine pH from crashing to the mid 5's; and keeping it somewhere near 7, the absurdly long fibers
and large fiber tangles are not being produced. I find it interesting to read that the fiber production of A. xylinus is inhibited at pH's above 7.0. Maybe just a coincidence..but
maybe not.