Post by Niels on Aug 13, 2008 1:05:01 GMT -5
posted in response here: nielsmayer.com/roller/NielsMayer/entry/wpafb_develops_morgellons_and_gay
In response to David Curtis comment "can't be proven to have engineered this and similar illnesses"... this argument becomes increasingly harder to disprove
when there's coverups like the current Dr. Bruce Ivins
suicide/FBI-case:
www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/08/01/anthrax/index.html
How neat to be able to completely dead-end all further inquiries on the death of "lone gunman" Dr. Bruce Ivins, recently implicated in the 2001 Anthrax "mystery" attacks that helped draw the US into an illegal war with Iraq on the ruse that they had developed "weapons of mass destruction." Of course, every bioweapon in Iraq was straight from Ft. Detrick as the US supplied Iraq with bioweapons to fight our proxy war against Iran.
Dr. Ivins worked at Ft. Detrick for many years, with full access to all the known bioweapons, as well as the ones under development there, including the ones kept "on ice" after Nixon shut down Ft. Detrick's active research into producing bioweapons. Now they continue using those same bioweapons, except that they pretend to follow the geneva conventions through the ruse of "biodefense" ... Now they invent new weapons, and invent the antidote which only the elite will have access to.
In fact, Dr. Ivins was working on one of the elite antidotes -- for anthrax -- and in fact vaccinated himself with his vaccine -- which is how he was able to manufacture the anthrax and put it in all those letters without getting infected himself. Funny thing is that his Anthrax vaccine was apparently implicated in "Gulf War Syndrome" and in 2001, Dr. Ivins was having particularly bad mental problems as the military had decided to blame his vaccine for Gulf War Syndrome -- for the purpose of covering up the real reason behind gulf war syndrome -- it's one of the Ft. Detrick bioweapons we supplied to Saddam Hussein -- whose used it against our own troops during the Gulf War -- and brought it home to cause our sudden "mystery" increase in autism, alzheimers, cancer, autoimmune diseases, etc.
The reality is that gulf war syndrome was probably triggered by Ivins Anthrax vaccine, much like other vaccines have been implicated in triggering Autism. In both cases, the authorities are doing everything possible to actively deny the fact that US bioweapons were used against our own forces or "accidentally" released into the wild ... and that these forces brought back the infection... and triggered autism in their vaccinated children, after returning from the battlefield with the infection:
> These chronic bacterial infections can spread to immediate family
> members. In a recent study we found that spouses of veterans with Gulf
> War Illness and chronic infections, such as M. fermentans, were at high
> risk for the infection. We also found that the children (aged 2-11
> years) of Gulf War veterans with Gulf War Illness and a positive test for
> mycoplasmal infection (mostly M. fermentans) often were diagnosed with
> Autistic Spectrum Disorders (ASD). Upon examination of the ASD patients
> we found that over 80% had the same infection as their veteran parent.
> The onset of ASD (after the veteran returned from service) and the
> presence of the same infection suggested transmission of the infection
> and its involvement in ASD. These chronic bacterial infections can
> spread to immediate family members. In a recent study we found that
> spouses of veterans with Gulf War Illness and chronic infections, such as
> M. fermentans, were at high risk for the infection. We also found that
> the children (aged 2-11 years) of Gulf War veterans with Gulf War Illness
> and a positive test for mycoplasmal infection (mostly M. fermentans)
> often were diagnosed with Autistic Spectrum Disorders (ASD). Upon
> examination of the ASD patients we found that over 80% had the same
> infection as their veteran parent. The onset of ASD (after the veteran
> returned from service) and the presence of the same infection suggested
> transmission of the infection and its involvement in ASD.
In fact, the denial is so far-reaching that the CDC decided to SETTLE (as in we give up, here's some hush money so that you don't ask any more questions)
a lawsuit that vaccines cause autism ( www.thedailygreen.com/environmental-news/latest/autism-vaccines-mercury-47030702 )
> Hannah's case is unique and that her rare condition led to a rare consequence.
>They say her case should not be extrapolated to the thousands of other autistic
>children whose parents think they were harmed by the vaccines."
Of course, if you look at "Hannah's case" you'll note that the poor girl clearly was infected with mycoplasma or lyme, both of which are bioweapons that are vigorously denied, ofbfuscated or simply ignored by the medical community as part of the coverup of US bioweapons being at the root of all our natuions health crises. The settlement effectively blocked further investigation into the infection-caused reason why vaccines trigger autism, giving us convenient misdirection through oft-repeated lies
"it's a medical mystery" or "every case is unique" (we put on lots of blindfolds to make them seem more similar).
Bottom line is that the military and medical establishment has a common response to any complaints by patients in response to their released bioweapons -- "it's all in the head" -- that was the response given to the gulf war veterans sickened by the bioweapons, it's the response given to why gulf-war vet families are similarly mistreaded with additional "folie a deux" "fole a famille' or "munchhausen's by proxy" diagnoses, it's the response given to those in the early stages of any of the demylinating neuro-degeneration that is triggered by the government's stealth disabler bioweapons.
In other words, just given the medical response by "authorities", Morgellons is clearly yet another Ft. Detrick bioweapon. Maybe Dr. Ivins has been busy for a long time?
Along with a "long history of mental problems" , it has been reported that Ivins also had a long history of "mailing packages from other postboxes" (for example, he mailed the antrax letters from a mailbox near Princeton sorority of a former love interest).
Of course, the FBI is now attempting to close this "solved mystery" in order to coverup the nasty evil work that taxpayers have been funding for decades at Ft. Detrick. Work that is illegal, immoral, and antithetical to USA's constitutional values. It's just fundamentally wrong.
They're not saying whether any of those other packages Ivins mailed out, contained, say, microscopic lyme/morgellonas infected mites, nypmph ticks, or nematode eggs. All of which could be stuffed in an envelope with powder and paper shavings... and mailed around to infect millions.
I'm sure he had access to whatever it was they've been spraying on drug crops for the purpose of infecting everybody involved in the drug trade, and drug users too. The bioweapons mentioned in my original blog-entry were probably developed at Ft. Detrick, and Bruce Ivins had access to them:
> Along with the other enormities presently perpetrated in the name of the
> War on Drugs, the United States is now actively preparing to deploy
> biological weapons. The weapons consist of plant pathogens designed to
> attack coca, cannabis and opium poppy crops.
> Research into the project has involved the resurrection of biological
> agents developed long ago at Fort Detrick, Maryland, center for the US
> biowar program closed down by President Nixon in 1969. Deep-frozen at
> the time of the program's termination, they are now being thawed out and
> readied for assault on producer countries in the third world. Also
> involved are veterans of the Soviet biological warfare effort, now being
> funded by the US through the connivance of an obscure UN agency,
> employed for this purpose in order to shield the US from well-deserved
> charges of violating the internationally negotiated biological weapons
> convention.
>
> The work is proceeding despite well attested evidence that the weapons,
> if deployed, will have profound and disastrous impact on the ecologies
> of the countries in which they are used. Furthermore, the USDA is now
> researching the use of genetic modification to enhance the potency of
> these bio-weapons. The principal agents under development are microbial
> pathogens.
>
> At the Institute for Genetics in Kazakhstan, former Soviet biowarriors
> are being financed by the US and Britain to test mycoherbicides-fungi,
> specifically Pleospora - to kill opium poppies and marijuana plants. In
> the Andes and western Amazon, the US is planning the testing and
> widespread application of fusarium oxysporum, an anti-coca fungus. The
> FY 2000 budget contains at least $23 million for these programs,
> although further appropriations are almost certainly buried in covert
> military and intelligence budgets.
>
> The prospect of being on the receiving end of a biological attack is not
> alluring to countries such as Peru, Bolivia and Colombia. The Peruvian
> government has already banned the testing and or deployment of the
> fungi. The Colombian government is similarly queasy, but has been
> sharply admonished by the project's supporters in the US Congress that
> if Colombia wants its $1.8 billion aid package, it had better take the
> fungi too.
>
> Last March, House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Benjamin Gilman,
> R-N.Y., added an amendment to the Colombian aid bill requiring President
> Clinton to certify that the Colombian government "has agreed to and is
> implementing a strategy to eliminate Colombia's total coca and opium
> poppy production" using, among other means, "tested, environmentally
> safe mycoherbicides." The amendment is still in the bill (which is still
> stalled in the senate) despite a submission by Colombian scientists to
> the Colombian Ombudsman for the Environment that the use of
> mycoherbicide agents in Colombia represents "a great danger both for
> Colombian humans as well as for the Colombian environment and
> biodiversity".
>
> It is easy to see why the Colombians are worried. The absolute
> requirement of this sort of weapon is that it should be "host specific",
> ie that it should attack only the intended victim and nothing else.
> According to Ed Hammond of the Sunshine Project, which has researched
> and publicized this enormity, tests conducted by USDA-contracted
> researchers in 1994 and 1995 using the favored strain of the fungus
> fusarium oxysporum-EN4-resulted in two non-coca species becoming
> infected.
>
> Furthermore, fusarium oxysporum strains that infect coca plants are
> closely related to those that attack yams, a staple in the Andean diet.
> This is hardly surprising, Hammond points out, in view of the fact that
> EN4 is designed to attack different strains of coca and therefore cannot
> be entirely host specific. Thus the rare and beautiful Agrias butterfly
> may soon fall as one more casualty of the War on Drugs, since its larvae
> feed and mature on wild relatives of the coca plant. One of the few
> remaining areas where Agrias can be found is the upper Putamayo river
> region, a center both of guerrilla activity and coca cultivation in
> Colombia and therefore a prime target for the US fungus spraying
> campaign.
>
> Meanwhile, back at the lab, USDA researchers have been working to create
> genetically modified strains of the fungi, including the cloning of
> fusarium strains that attack potatoes, in order to produce something
> still more vicious.
>
> However, in their search for instruments of what is officially known as
> "bio-control", the government's researchers have also, it seems, reached
> back into the past. Sometime before 1969, according to documents
> supplied to Hammond under the FOIA, a team from APHIS, the USDA's plant
> and animal inspection service, found a virus on a Datura tree imported
> from Cauca, Colombia. Someone, it is not clear who, determined that the
> virus could be useful as an anti-opium poppy agent, and it was
> dispatched to the US biological warfare center at Fort Detrick, Maryland
> under the label D-437.
>
> Following Nixon's order to close the place down, D-437 was not destroyed
> but put in deep frozen storage, forgotten by all but the researchers who
> had worked so happily at Detrick. On April 12 this year, Hammond caught
> a brief mention of D-437 on a US Army website, along with the fact that
> it was being studied by a Dr Vernon Damsteegt, himself a Detrick
> veteran. Following enquiries by Hammond, all mention of the virus and
> its custodian was hurriedly removed from the site, which now carried a
> fraudulent notification that it had last been updated on April 6.
> 1969 was the year Richard Nixon launched his war on drugs, using it to
> set up what was intended to be his very own secret police force - the
> Drug Enforcement Agency, a story chronicled in Edward J. Epstein's great
> book Agency of Fear.
>
> Biological warfare was integral to the US war against Vietnam.
> CounterPunchers will recall Agent Orange, the hellish brew deployed to
> defoliate the jungle. Agent Blue, targeted on rice production, is less
> well known. The aim was to wipe out the NLF's food supply. Rice
> plantations deemed to be servicing the enemy were duly sprayed and
> obliterated. Professor Matthew Meselsen recalls how, early in 1970, he
> was taken by a US Army Chemical Corps colonel to survey a valley in an
> upland area that had been sprayed with Agent Blue some weeks before. As
> they flew over the devastated valley, the colonel proudly explained to
> Meselsen that this had obviously been an NLF food supply area since
> there were no houses to be seen.
In response to David Curtis comment "can't be proven to have engineered this and similar illnesses"... this argument becomes increasingly harder to disprove
when there's coverups like the current Dr. Bruce Ivins
suicide/FBI-case:
www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/08/01/anthrax/index.html
How neat to be able to completely dead-end all further inquiries on the death of "lone gunman" Dr. Bruce Ivins, recently implicated in the 2001 Anthrax "mystery" attacks that helped draw the US into an illegal war with Iraq on the ruse that they had developed "weapons of mass destruction." Of course, every bioweapon in Iraq was straight from Ft. Detrick as the US supplied Iraq with bioweapons to fight our proxy war against Iran.
Dr. Ivins worked at Ft. Detrick for many years, with full access to all the known bioweapons, as well as the ones under development there, including the ones kept "on ice" after Nixon shut down Ft. Detrick's active research into producing bioweapons. Now they continue using those same bioweapons, except that they pretend to follow the geneva conventions through the ruse of "biodefense" ... Now they invent new weapons, and invent the antidote which only the elite will have access to.
In fact, Dr. Ivins was working on one of the elite antidotes -- for anthrax -- and in fact vaccinated himself with his vaccine -- which is how he was able to manufacture the anthrax and put it in all those letters without getting infected himself. Funny thing is that his Anthrax vaccine was apparently implicated in "Gulf War Syndrome" and in 2001, Dr. Ivins was having particularly bad mental problems as the military had decided to blame his vaccine for Gulf War Syndrome -- for the purpose of covering up the real reason behind gulf war syndrome -- it's one of the Ft. Detrick bioweapons we supplied to Saddam Hussein -- whose used it against our own troops during the Gulf War -- and brought it home to cause our sudden "mystery" increase in autism, alzheimers, cancer, autoimmune diseases, etc.
The reality is that gulf war syndrome was probably triggered by Ivins Anthrax vaccine, much like other vaccines have been implicated in triggering Autism. In both cases, the authorities are doing everything possible to actively deny the fact that US bioweapons were used against our own forces or "accidentally" released into the wild ... and that these forces brought back the infection... and triggered autism in their vaccinated children, after returning from the battlefield with the infection:
> These chronic bacterial infections can spread to immediate family
> members. In a recent study we found that spouses of veterans with Gulf
> War Illness and chronic infections, such as M. fermentans, were at high
> risk for the infection. We also found that the children (aged 2-11
> years) of Gulf War veterans with Gulf War Illness and a positive test for
> mycoplasmal infection (mostly M. fermentans) often were diagnosed with
> Autistic Spectrum Disorders (ASD). Upon examination of the ASD patients
> we found that over 80% had the same infection as their veteran parent.
> The onset of ASD (after the veteran returned from service) and the
> presence of the same infection suggested transmission of the infection
> and its involvement in ASD. These chronic bacterial infections can
> spread to immediate family members. In a recent study we found that
> spouses of veterans with Gulf War Illness and chronic infections, such as
> M. fermentans, were at high risk for the infection. We also found that
> the children (aged 2-11 years) of Gulf War veterans with Gulf War Illness
> and a positive test for mycoplasmal infection (mostly M. fermentans)
> often were diagnosed with Autistic Spectrum Disorders (ASD). Upon
> examination of the ASD patients we found that over 80% had the same
> infection as their veteran parent. The onset of ASD (after the veteran
> returned from service) and the presence of the same infection suggested
> transmission of the infection and its involvement in ASD.
In fact, the denial is so far-reaching that the CDC decided to SETTLE (as in we give up, here's some hush money so that you don't ask any more questions)
a lawsuit that vaccines cause autism ( www.thedailygreen.com/environmental-news/latest/autism-vaccines-mercury-47030702 )
> Hannah's case is unique and that her rare condition led to a rare consequence.
>They say her case should not be extrapolated to the thousands of other autistic
>children whose parents think they were harmed by the vaccines."
Of course, if you look at "Hannah's case" you'll note that the poor girl clearly was infected with mycoplasma or lyme, both of which are bioweapons that are vigorously denied, ofbfuscated or simply ignored by the medical community as part of the coverup of US bioweapons being at the root of all our natuions health crises. The settlement effectively blocked further investigation into the infection-caused reason why vaccines trigger autism, giving us convenient misdirection through oft-repeated lies
"it's a medical mystery" or "every case is unique" (we put on lots of blindfolds to make them seem more similar).
Bottom line is that the military and medical establishment has a common response to any complaints by patients in response to their released bioweapons -- "it's all in the head" -- that was the response given to the gulf war veterans sickened by the bioweapons, it's the response given to why gulf-war vet families are similarly mistreaded with additional "folie a deux" "fole a famille' or "munchhausen's by proxy" diagnoses, it's the response given to those in the early stages of any of the demylinating neuro-degeneration that is triggered by the government's stealth disabler bioweapons.
In other words, just given the medical response by "authorities", Morgellons is clearly yet another Ft. Detrick bioweapon. Maybe Dr. Ivins has been busy for a long time?
Along with a "long history of mental problems" , it has been reported that Ivins also had a long history of "mailing packages from other postboxes" (for example, he mailed the antrax letters from a mailbox near Princeton sorority of a former love interest).
Of course, the FBI is now attempting to close this "solved mystery" in order to coverup the nasty evil work that taxpayers have been funding for decades at Ft. Detrick. Work that is illegal, immoral, and antithetical to USA's constitutional values. It's just fundamentally wrong.
They're not saying whether any of those other packages Ivins mailed out, contained, say, microscopic lyme/morgellonas infected mites, nypmph ticks, or nematode eggs. All of which could be stuffed in an envelope with powder and paper shavings... and mailed around to infect millions.
I'm sure he had access to whatever it was they've been spraying on drug crops for the purpose of infecting everybody involved in the drug trade, and drug users too. The bioweapons mentioned in my original blog-entry were probably developed at Ft. Detrick, and Bruce Ivins had access to them:
> Along with the other enormities presently perpetrated in the name of the
> War on Drugs, the United States is now actively preparing to deploy
> biological weapons. The weapons consist of plant pathogens designed to
> attack coca, cannabis and opium poppy crops.
> Research into the project has involved the resurrection of biological
> agents developed long ago at Fort Detrick, Maryland, center for the US
> biowar program closed down by President Nixon in 1969. Deep-frozen at
> the time of the program's termination, they are now being thawed out and
> readied for assault on producer countries in the third world. Also
> involved are veterans of the Soviet biological warfare effort, now being
> funded by the US through the connivance of an obscure UN agency,
> employed for this purpose in order to shield the US from well-deserved
> charges of violating the internationally negotiated biological weapons
> convention.
>
> The work is proceeding despite well attested evidence that the weapons,
> if deployed, will have profound and disastrous impact on the ecologies
> of the countries in which they are used. Furthermore, the USDA is now
> researching the use of genetic modification to enhance the potency of
> these bio-weapons. The principal agents under development are microbial
> pathogens.
>
> At the Institute for Genetics in Kazakhstan, former Soviet biowarriors
> are being financed by the US and Britain to test mycoherbicides-fungi,
> specifically Pleospora - to kill opium poppies and marijuana plants. In
> the Andes and western Amazon, the US is planning the testing and
> widespread application of fusarium oxysporum, an anti-coca fungus. The
> FY 2000 budget contains at least $23 million for these programs,
> although further appropriations are almost certainly buried in covert
> military and intelligence budgets.
>
> The prospect of being on the receiving end of a biological attack is not
> alluring to countries such as Peru, Bolivia and Colombia. The Peruvian
> government has already banned the testing and or deployment of the
> fungi. The Colombian government is similarly queasy, but has been
> sharply admonished by the project's supporters in the US Congress that
> if Colombia wants its $1.8 billion aid package, it had better take the
> fungi too.
>
> Last March, House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Benjamin Gilman,
> R-N.Y., added an amendment to the Colombian aid bill requiring President
> Clinton to certify that the Colombian government "has agreed to and is
> implementing a strategy to eliminate Colombia's total coca and opium
> poppy production" using, among other means, "tested, environmentally
> safe mycoherbicides." The amendment is still in the bill (which is still
> stalled in the senate) despite a submission by Colombian scientists to
> the Colombian Ombudsman for the Environment that the use of
> mycoherbicide agents in Colombia represents "a great danger both for
> Colombian humans as well as for the Colombian environment and
> biodiversity".
>
> It is easy to see why the Colombians are worried. The absolute
> requirement of this sort of weapon is that it should be "host specific",
> ie that it should attack only the intended victim and nothing else.
> According to Ed Hammond of the Sunshine Project, which has researched
> and publicized this enormity, tests conducted by USDA-contracted
> researchers in 1994 and 1995 using the favored strain of the fungus
> fusarium oxysporum-EN4-resulted in two non-coca species becoming
> infected.
>
> Furthermore, fusarium oxysporum strains that infect coca plants are
> closely related to those that attack yams, a staple in the Andean diet.
> This is hardly surprising, Hammond points out, in view of the fact that
> EN4 is designed to attack different strains of coca and therefore cannot
> be entirely host specific. Thus the rare and beautiful Agrias butterfly
> may soon fall as one more casualty of the War on Drugs, since its larvae
> feed and mature on wild relatives of the coca plant. One of the few
> remaining areas where Agrias can be found is the upper Putamayo river
> region, a center both of guerrilla activity and coca cultivation in
> Colombia and therefore a prime target for the US fungus spraying
> campaign.
>
> Meanwhile, back at the lab, USDA researchers have been working to create
> genetically modified strains of the fungi, including the cloning of
> fusarium strains that attack potatoes, in order to produce something
> still more vicious.
>
> However, in their search for instruments of what is officially known as
> "bio-control", the government's researchers have also, it seems, reached
> back into the past. Sometime before 1969, according to documents
> supplied to Hammond under the FOIA, a team from APHIS, the USDA's plant
> and animal inspection service, found a virus on a Datura tree imported
> from Cauca, Colombia. Someone, it is not clear who, determined that the
> virus could be useful as an anti-opium poppy agent, and it was
> dispatched to the US biological warfare center at Fort Detrick, Maryland
> under the label D-437.
>
> Following Nixon's order to close the place down, D-437 was not destroyed
> but put in deep frozen storage, forgotten by all but the researchers who
> had worked so happily at Detrick. On April 12 this year, Hammond caught
> a brief mention of D-437 on a US Army website, along with the fact that
> it was being studied by a Dr Vernon Damsteegt, himself a Detrick
> veteran. Following enquiries by Hammond, all mention of the virus and
> its custodian was hurriedly removed from the site, which now carried a
> fraudulent notification that it had last been updated on April 6.
> 1969 was the year Richard Nixon launched his war on drugs, using it to
> set up what was intended to be his very own secret police force - the
> Drug Enforcement Agency, a story chronicled in Edward J. Epstein's great
> book Agency of Fear.
>
> Biological warfare was integral to the US war against Vietnam.
> CounterPunchers will recall Agent Orange, the hellish brew deployed to
> defoliate the jungle. Agent Blue, targeted on rice production, is less
> well known. The aim was to wipe out the NLF's food supply. Rice
> plantations deemed to be servicing the enemy were duly sprayed and
> obliterated. Professor Matthew Meselsen recalls how, early in 1970, he
> was taken by a US Army Chemical Corps colonel to survey a valley in an
> upland area that had been sprayed with Agent Blue some weeks before. As
> they flew over the devastated valley, the colonel proudly explained to
> Meselsen that this had obviously been an NLF food supply area since
> there were no houses to be seen.