|
Post by toni on Apr 21, 2014 12:19:29 GMT -5
Important : All expressed, stated or commented by "me" is of my opinion only --- (UNLESS otherwise noted).
I believe that holds for all of us here too, even poster Baraka Obam.
Hi everyone!
Been here, but from a distance, just needed to really focus on things, as you know how that goes.
I want to share "the latest" from under the scope.
THIS is the FIRST time since 2005 that I've seen a TRUE parasite in the debris of "pickings" from the skin.
Until now...just odds and ends like we see, but NOW...imho, there is no doubt these 'skins that have been shed' are from a nematode.
Notice that "design" down the middle of it's back, that can help ID this.
Why I feel this is so important is because UP until NOW, I've looked under a scope at (debris) for 8 YEARS and this IS truly the first time I see something that looks like a real parasite.
What do you think?
Did these suckers take THIS LONG to show themselves, as there has NOT BEEN a day in my life for the last 8 years that I've not looked, and now.....here it is!
Be back with pictures!!! YES REAL scope pictures of it "finally".
Good to see you guys again.
Love Toni
|
|
|
Post by toni on Apr 21, 2014 12:25:01 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by toni on Apr 21, 2014 12:27:24 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by toni on Apr 21, 2014 12:31:59 GMT -5
Yesterday is when I "retrieved those " - out of my FACE, of all days, Easter, I got the tinglies and hadn't had them in a long long time, so I went a fishing/digging whatever, but there they are and they're as disguisting as hell on Earth.
I'll go right now and take pictures of these "molts/shed skins" at 1,000X times.
The above pics are only at 400X as to see the entire specimen.
Thank you.
|
|
|
Post by toni on Apr 21, 2014 13:04:03 GMT -5
Here is the top part of that (nematode looking specimen).
See that distinct pattern? Like a braid down it's back, well, not really a "braid" but, it's (specific) for whatever this is. duh...hahha
This is that horror specimen magnified from the VERY FIRST post with the picture above, just lots more magnification.
|
|
|
Post by toni on Apr 21, 2014 13:05:39 GMT -5
Well I'll be! It did post even that large.
IF this is too large for this post please let me know (admin) as I don't want to mess up this page with too large of a photo, AND I will scale it down.
Just want you guys to see that (pattern down it's back).
|
|
|
Post by toni on Apr 21, 2014 13:11:39 GMT -5
This is that same picture of that "parasite/nematode" I'm gathering that's what this is, from the above first picture again. 1,000x mag. A good look at the ends of the hollow'ness of this molting/skin shed specimen.
|
|
|
Post by Baraka Obam on Apr 21, 2014 22:07:48 GMT -5
Good to see your still kicking I am gonna wonder for a time untill I actually see the pictures what exactly your presenting.
What your looking at, is it moving or is it just a form, anyway,
THERE ARE NO PICTURES TO SEE, the only thing in your posts is a advertisement, copy the picture URL and post it
|
|
|
Post by toni on Apr 22, 2014 0:27:04 GMT -5
Hi Baraka,
Yes, I'd heard the pics weren't displaying right, and I'm sure sorry about that.
I sure won't use (( Luna Pic )) to do that job again. Whatever that
stuff is "in place of my scoped pictures, I haven't a clue.
Thanks for letting me know.
I'm going right now to upload them some where else, be back soon with them. *Editing this post too* I hope they'll display now. Let me know if they're not okay.
|
|
|
Post by toni on Apr 22, 2014 13:19:09 GMT -5
That little "oblong oval" fits (size wise) next to the specimens that look like *Exsheathed* or ((( shed skins))). Hope that makes sense. I was just taking a video of this egg (after I put a drop of water onto the slide) and the sucker floated around and around, until it went under some debris on my slide. Now I can't find it (but...it IS on the slide) just hiding in junk. The other day when I first saw that "egg" I didn't know what it was, but....remembering reading (nematode eggs are oval oblong) like that. Just HORRIBLE this is, and ALL this is just from a spot on my face. I looked up some common "nematodes" that human can get infected with, and it seems they live in the gut. So my question is, how are these IN MY FACE? In my lesions? Any thoughts?
|
|
|
Post by absurdlyhaywired on Apr 24, 2014 15:52:14 GMT -5
Toni, LOOK!
|
|
|
Post by absurdlyhaywired on Apr 24, 2014 15:53:10 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by lostintime on Apr 24, 2014 16:10:01 GMT -5
Cap1AE0.bmp (900.05 KB) Same thing here. I also have other images of molting. Don't know about nematodes molting but insect larva do molt. I have no doubt there is molting going on but from what is the question.
|
|
|
Post by Baraka Obam on Apr 24, 2014 20:55:49 GMT -5
So what has been presented here by Tony and affirmed by lostintime can be nothing more than the first assumption could suggest, nematodes and molting. Please PROVE the assumption , please PROVE this is what you call molting, where is any proof of such assumption, apparently there are piles and piles of microscopic pictures that will concur with your, these assumptions, what information do you extract your data from, please let me see the pictures. If you pull from the fact that one of your pictures is oblong that PROVES nematodes. If your gonna throw pure fiction into the fold please back it up with at least more than LIP SERVICE of the uneducated, a few pictures would be excellent. Here is a little explanation of nematodes it says they are HARD TO DISTINGUISH but there are possibly more than a million genus of these hard to distinguish animals. So what makes a expert, a person that wishes they know the answer, my god we are becoming doctors, idiots that think they know it all but actually can only repeat what we hear or imagine. Is this the study of Parapsychology or Parasitology which is the study, the study of innuendo in the brain or the fact that people could be infected by parasites thus any item observed under a microscope can be determined to be what we wish it to be. What makes the vision of material under a microscope by the uneducated in the field of Parasitology a fact, is it because two or more uneducated swear they know what they are talking about, my god, please save us. I saw Santa on a slide the other night, I swear I did, and nobody can say I did not, you don't know me, you don't know Santa. If you want to prove what you say, please provide some proof that what your showing and what your saying has validity. I remember a time when we could not identify a simple BUG, it took how many people to find this hog nosed bug. A perfect example, many people provided guesses but only one found the true answer, one member said what was the big deal to accurately identify this bug, LOL, that is my point exactly, some people do not care about truth or facts, they just blurt out their assumption as the fact. This bothers me in two ways, it convoluted others thoughts as they are easy to amuse and it destroys further investigation, after all facts are facts. If you have a bug disease I assure you, you do not have, as it is called now, MORGELLONS. I love to see answers, but molting and nematode pictures I do not see. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NematodeI am from Missouri the show me state, well actually I am not but I did stay at a Holiday Inn last night. Oh and I do have a few friends that live in Missouri, well maybe I do. Just because I do not agree with you on your easy assumptions does not mean I am not your friend, in all reality, what you state is NOT a assumption it is posted as a truth. I will always debate unsubstantiated truth. Then I will not dispute we as animals are not infected by parasites or nematodes as they are part of all that is the earth, still some proof, microscopic evidence from the internet you can easily aquire would be nice to back up assumtions. I do not know the basis of our disease, what I do know is our wide rage of symptoms some discount because they have not been subjected to as of yet that make us a group. They assume their symptoms suggest only one disease or one avenue of our disease. Itching, lesions, skin problems, hair loss, fibers coming out of the skin are not all we are dealing with.
|
|
|
Post by toni on Apr 25, 2014 9:06:19 GMT -5
Absurdly, YES, now it's making sense (imho) Thank you. Oh, question please: Are you at approx. 400X mag with the picture you just posted? Thanks.
|
|
|
Post by toni on Apr 25, 2014 9:11:14 GMT -5
Molting of Nematodes -
actually.....depending on the species of Nematode, that will be the determining factor of how many times that specific species will "molt" or 'shed it's cuticle'.
And, please see the word Exsheathment. This is what they (nematodes) also do, just depending on which or "who's" gut they're in.
cal.vet.upenn.edu/projects/merial/Nematodes/nems_7.htm
PS: Tons of info all over the internet in (agricultural) and in ( the life cycle of the Nematode) one will find that: nematodes in FACT do molt and using the ( DESIGN of it's skin/cuticle, in many cases) IS what helps ID the species of Nematode it is, besides the stylet etc, but that doesn't come with the shed "cuticle".
IMHO, is that if that "skin/cuticle" or whatever that specimen is that I've posted pictures of looks like something OTHER THAN some "shed skin from some worm/nematode" then I ask you please to put it out on the table for discussion. I ONLY want answers just like everyone else.
And full heartedly which is a * IMHO * thing....those designed-patterned-like-skins, taking into great consideration (size and form) to me........look just like molted cuticles of nematodes.
|
|
|
Post by toni on Apr 25, 2014 10:40:18 GMT -5
Just found a REALLY SUPER link here ( I think, I hope, hehe).
Check out the (DOCUMENT) in the middle of the page and just scroll all those fantastic
close-up pictures of so many species of Nematodes! Talk about "skin/cuticle patterns galore" on this link.
Maybe this can help us match something up Absurdly (IF) that's what your or my specimens are.
www.docstoc.com/docs/129292422/No-Slide-Title (PS, no need to Download anything either on that link), just scroll to see all the many patterns or designs of the cuticles/skins of nematodes.
|
|
|
Post by toni on Apr 25, 2014 10:57:57 GMT -5
Just a "FYI" thing.
I am not saying either that I think (nematodes) are the crux of Morgs.
I do believe though, that WE have something LOTS of critters are attracted to.
|
|
|
Post by toni on Apr 25, 2014 11:40:07 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by toni on Apr 25, 2014 12:41:21 GMT -5
There. I've outlined the (FLAPS) on these nematodes (text book drawing and mine) to show you this is without a doubt, a Nematode. I don't believe I can say it's ANYTHING but a Nematode. In fact (I won't say it's anything BUT a Nematode)- I'd have to be blind to not see this. Can you? If so..show me because to date, there is nothing I've found that looks just like a nematode but..a nematode. Size fits, ALL of it fits. Any question about it Barako? If so, I'm more than happy to accommodate ((((( BECAUSE )))) I can't be the ONLY PERSON seeing this similarity in size, in structure, and in design etc. They "just are not the same exact Species".....but give me more time, I'll find out, and.... I'd sure not object to any help out there either. Bottom line, (if you can see the similarity) then you may ask yourself the same as I am asking myself - WHY and HOW can Nematodes (that cannot live in warm blooded animals) be amongst the debris of dermal pickings? Galls that is....bacterial C. Galls (not as in the bird, seagull) but as in the bacterium "Agro" where nematodes thrive in the growths of the C. Galls. Is that the WHITE stuff we've got growing in our skin? Sure is getting more real "imho".
|
|