|
Post by chaosonline on Jul 21, 2007 22:20:04 GMT -5
Hey Guys, Does anyone here know what the CDC is trying to say on this hidden webpage? [ftp]http://rarediseasesinfo.aspensys.com/asp/diseases/diseaseinfo.asp?ID=1945[/ftp] I believe I possibly have a mutation to chromosome band 1q42-1a43. Anyone else? I know this because my sister's daughter has situs inversus complete. My sister sent me this link about 5 days ago and I didn't realize what it was until today. Check this out too: tinyurl.com/yw2l4u[/b]*NOTE The CDC changed the web page on 7/23/07. To view the original take the 2nd link above and view the Google cache of the web page or use this link (paste and copy if necessary):[/b][/color] tinyurl.com/yvsbe5Karen W
|
|
|
Post by prevenge on Jul 21, 2007 22:30:51 GMT -5
holy S.
-M
|
|
|
Post by prevenge on Jul 21, 2007 22:46:19 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by browncircles on Jul 21, 2007 22:47:16 GMT -5
I think it's just a typo but who knows?
|
|
|
Post by betsy on Jul 21, 2007 22:51:34 GMT -5
I agree---confusing. Are they suggesting Morgellons is a genetic disease? Gee- that would certainly steer it away from "man-made pathogen". Maybe they are trying a new strategy.
|
|
|
Post by chaosonline on Jul 21, 2007 22:59:00 GMT -5
No not a manmade pathogen but a disposition...very few of us would have this genetic defect...then even fewer are exposed to Lyme and the genetic defect allows the GMO's to open the door to our DNA... I'm just theorizing but there are 2 links and the 2nd one has Morgellon's listed also. Karen W
|
|
|
Post by janedough on Jul 21, 2007 23:10:37 GMT -5
wow, we must have a new genetic defect that has never existed before 1989. Imagine you have carried this from the mitochondria that is only passed on by the maternal side and none of your moms had this rare gene? ? Come ON. If they are gonna tell me it is genetic, they will have to start diggin up dead bodies and show me.
|
|
|
Post by Sidney on Jul 22, 2007 0:16:31 GMT -5
Chaosonline, just curious, but why do you call the website you found a CDC hidden website?
|
|
|
Post by prevenge on Jul 22, 2007 0:22:12 GMT -5
genetic doesn't mean HEREDITARY exclusively.
there exists "gene therapy" which modifies genes for the betterment or the detraction of health.
possibly the "end result" .. is our genes being modified... for better or for worse.
by the process of the pathogen. (fibers - bioenginered bacillus subtilis etc..)
regardless of all this.. there still remains the evidence of "silicon rivers"
so there's much more than meets the eye with this.
this could be a "cover" to instigate that we're becoming retarded (as much of the research i just did on Trisomy (replication to create a third chromosome) of the gene "1q42 11 q42 12".
but then again.. those cases didn't exhibit (of the literature's stating) .. fibers... muscle spasms.. fatigue .. etc..
so either we're exhibiting the "process" of the "pathogen" that changes your DNA to make you retarded...
or..
just like any fine tuning in experimental engineering.. the process of enhancement can be black or white till you find gold. meaning..
many xhanges to this gene could cause negative effects.. or incredibly positive ones. ungodly positive ones.. yet the process of the "transformation" through the pathogen's biological processes.. could be uh.. slightly unpleasant and confusing. ( to put it mildly).
so whatever it is (popping up in the late 90's) .. changing us..
could be for good or bad.
that's the query I find myself frustrated and anguished about at the base of this all usually.
is what's happening to me/us ..blatant experimentation for the goal of knowledge and/or retardation for cold-minded sociological steering?
or is it just a necessary confusing and painful process to something better?
this question haunts me.
-M
|
|
|
Post by chaosonline on Jul 22, 2007 0:45:45 GMT -5
Interesting....my sister sent me this: Cystic Fibrosis patients are one of the few people whose lungs become infected with agrobactrium (scroll to ABSTRCT): www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=85827This mentions variant cystic fibrosis as a possible link with situs inversus. Notice the defective ion transporter: 1 q42 is the gene associated with situs inversis and Cystic Fibrosis. clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00323167?order=1 Karen W I call it hidden because it doesn't show when you search CDC for Morgellon's a different page displays with no mention f the genes. Believe me I'm no scientist, I just don't think it is a typo... There is more to it.
|
|
|
Post by prevenge on Jul 22, 2007 1:58:05 GMT -5
also- The Mendelian Inheritance in Man project is a database that catalogues all the known diseases with a genetic component, and - when possible - links them to the relevant genes in the human genome. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mendelian_Inheritance_in_Man-M
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Jul 22, 2007 3:01:53 GMT -5
This most likely is a recent mutation, a new one so to speak, so it will not be in known genetic diseases, unless just recently added. jmg.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/39/12/e79ah hah..............synthesis.........thought they could add another gene? www1.imim.es/courses/BioinformaticaUPF/2002/projects/1.6/Angles.htmProtein biosynthesis: www1.imim.es/courses/BioinformaticaUPF/2002/projects/1.6/Angles.htm#INTRODUCCIÓfrom above link they mention the Rossman fold: well look here.........my my.........a planned mutation, I can betcha! So, gene therapy as Prevenge mentions just waiting in the wings, heh~! Funny think didn't work in past for Downs Syndrome or for Muscular Dystrophy. B......ds......... Like the CDC says, that we create the disease and then hurry and scurry to find the cure. Seems they have the gene therapy out there waiting, don't you think? Add that thrid chromosome and see if we adapt. B......ds....... Seems to be the plan AMA has used for many years. Keep em coming, now we will have many to experiment on, is this how the Singularity gets rolling when they want to introduce the new nano tech? Great setup. At least the CDC is coming through the back door, before they get slapped! fold.doe-mbi.ucla.edu/SKytroll
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Jul 22, 2007 3:11:49 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Jul 22, 2007 3:27:54 GMT -5
Hang on folks we are getting to the Amyloid prion fibrils........ Crystalization of proteins: nihserver.mbi.ucla.edu/FIBERS/"The single-stranded-DNA-binding proteins (SSBs) are essential for DNA function in prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells, mitochondria, phages and viruses. The structures of four SSBs have been solved, but the molecular details of the interaction of SSBs with DNA remain speculative." Had no idea how the SSB and DNA would interact! Remember how the prokaryote had to have a way of becoming eukaryote for humans to have evolved? Since they didn't find it they created it and thought we would just adapt. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=8990123&dopt=AbstractSkytroll
|
|
|
Post by freaky on Jul 22, 2007 3:31:50 GMT -5
Now, do we call the Natl.Human Genome Research Institute? Ah, well, the Genetic & Rare Disease Info. Center gave it's phone #.I'm confused. Has morgellons been reclassified to a rare disease? I don't quite understand all this hebe gebe? Do you think they would be considerate enough to explain their findings to us Morgellons suffurers? I still don't like the fact the CDC has my name. I believe you have been elaborating.Nevermind. What I write here is not showing up on the post. Spooky. I'm not sure I understand everything explicitly. Can anyone here elaborate ? Thanks for trying to read this,freaky
I tried to remove the last part, but it isn't showing up on modify. So strange. Might be fun. I'not xu
Does anyone care ta ggggggggg jjjjjjjaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Jul 22, 2007 3:41:01 GMT -5
Freaky,
Simply put we are be hybridized, a third single stand chromosome that is crystallized protein has been attempted to be added to our double strand chromosomes.
How this was done well we are trying to get there.
Has to do with the folding of the proteins.
What we have is a mutation, but, this was deliberately done, this was no accident.
Through experimental developmental biology and then evolutionary biology experimentation.
If this is true and it is Chromosome 1, that means this is the first chromosome to duplicated in other words clones in us. So we have an extra chromosome, but, it is a synthetic one.
Does that make sense?
The CDC owes us a BIG explanation, and if they are willing to work with us, then we can forgive their laziness, other wise they are part of the ill -conceived plan.
Skytroll
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Jul 22, 2007 3:41:48 GMT -5
The investigators allowed this to happen.
skytroll
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Jul 22, 2007 3:43:18 GMT -5
I ain't letting this one die folks, been there with other mutations, one more still doesn''t have my brain!
Skytroll
|
|
|
Post by freaky on Jul 22, 2007 3:43:56 GMT -5
Thank you Skytroll. :-*freaky
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Jul 22, 2007 3:44:57 GMT -5
|
|