|
Post by Matrix on Jun 18, 2011 18:23:13 GMT -5
TYPES
FIBER OPTICS-- Fiber optics permits the Network to use a fiber optic that looks like a hair as a television camera. In a body suit, several fiber optic cameras that look like hairs will be installed in key places to provide the handlers remote viewing. Fiber optics can also be mounted in the victim, to provide a means to receive remote pictures. Fiber optic implants can be placed by needle into any site on the body. One victim of electronic mind-control, who has repeatedly pulled out Fiber Optic hairs, had a tiny fiber optic hair shot into her chest above her tank top while she was in a restaurant. Some other implants that carry out the same function look like warts, moles, or blisters.
ARTIFICIAL LENSES -- One victim describes his eye implants: "They are oblong objects with a square opening in the middle of them. They appear to be located on my corneas or rapped around them to be more accurate. They are connected to rods or wires that are spread out over my facial area and under the skin like a mask. The implants also appear to be connected to cochlear implants which are the cause of the repeated voice transmissions that I hear." Via a camera, she was able to pick up the presence of a reddish orange smear or stain covering my eye lens. The color blends with her own eye coloring so it is extremely difficult to see anything in her eyes. The lenses of the implants are not lined up evenly with her cornea. The victim with the visual implants states, "Whenever I close my eyes, I see the presence of constant red orange haze centered with a tint of whitish blue. I also see a small area of fluorescent green color. When I sleep, I am subjected to virtual reality type pictures like programs being run through a computer with a 3-D effect. There is a constant whirring and clicking effect that comes from other implants such as the ears." In review. Visual implants are at time called visual prosthetus, but are actually attachments rather than replacements. They are oblong with a square opening in the middle of them. They are located on the cornea (rapped around them) and are connected to rods/wires that are spread out over the facial area and under the skin like a mask. The coloring of the implant is blended with natural eye colors to camouflage it. When the victim closes his or her eyes there is a constant presence of a red-orange haze centered around a small screen. There are also two orbs with a tint of whitish blue, and a small area of fluorescent green. Visual reality pictures are run like programs from a computer, that have a three-D effect. The left forehead scalp area has a whirring noise.
BIO-CHIPS that "talk" to nerve cells. Some of the readers will have already heard of the bio-chips that talk to nerve cells. Stanford Research Inst. has been working on such bio-chips. Bear in mind, public research is generally a cover for what has already been discovered.
HOLOGRAPHIC OR H-INSERT-- There is one type which has been called a Holographic Insert or H-Implant. A holographic memory is created by this implant. This may or may not be the Nanobots which are capable of creating holographic images in the mind. Let’s discuss the nanobots.
|
|
|
Post by Matrix on Jun 18, 2011 18:10:53 GMT -5
C3. VISUAL/HOLOGRAPHIC IMPLANTS
BACKGROUND.
Hollywood has given us movies where visual and holographic implants are shown, but what about the real world? Yes, it does happen in more than the movies. Publicly, the establishment has only experimentally placed visual implants into a few volunteers. On the real life side of the NWO, there have been a number of victims who have been subjected to visual implants without their consent. One victim in Massachusetts labels her visual implants "visual prosthetics’, but mentions "I use this term loosely because they are more so attachments than replacements of my own vision.
Every now and then the public is made aware of where the World Order wants people to think research is at. In the Jan. 13, 1997 issue of U.S. News & World Report (p. 52), the unveiling by researchers of the retinal chip that could potentially give sight to the blind was reported. It was interesting the article’s choice of words "retinal chip unveiled" (bold added).
After it was realized that sounds could be artificially made via electromagnetic waves in deaf people, researchers naturally thought of giving sight to the blind. In the 1960’s and 1970’s researchers struggled to produce implants that could restore sight to the blind. This research was hijacked by the NWO types and has been developed into another component for their mind-control.
In the 60’s Giles Brindley and others at Cambridge Univ. and in the 70’s William Dobelle and others at the Univ. of Utah, both were able to show that individual phosphenes could be evoked by electrical currents, thus showing the feasibility of visual implants. (See GS Brindley’s paper "The sensations produced by electrical stimulation of the visual cortex" in J. Physiology, Vol. 196, 1968, pp. 479-493. and W.H. Dobelle’s article in 1974 "Phosphenes produced by electrical stimulation of human occipital cortex, and their application to the development of a prosthesis for the blind." in J. Physiol, 243: 553-576.) The public development went forward with the blind. Since most blind people still have the neurons (which are like a natural computer) in the higher visual regions of the brain fully intact, the implants are designed to take advantage of this unused potential.
The body has sensory pathways, that were discovered to be maps. In creating a visual image, the brain actually takes an image through several maps before getting the final image. There is a map for motion, along with at least 5 others maps such as one for form. The photoreceptors of the retina react to the three primary colors and have 3 primary color maps created by the electrical image made from the photoreceptors of the retina. (One’s genetics contribute to how each person perceives a primary color, we don’t all see colors uniformly.) The retina’s output (called optic nerves or retinal output) map the electrical image again onto the retinal ganglion cells. Then the optic nerves project the electrical image to a relay image (the lateral geniculate nucleus) where the brain begins combining the maps of the two eyes. Another network of neurons (called the optic radiations) then transfers the image back to the rear of the brain to the primary visual cortex. Then the brain takes the image through several higher level maps to its final finished product--the viewer’s perceived picture. The microelectrode array that creates a map for the blind person may be hooked up to the primary visual cortex, or other points in the process. The microelectrode arrays that were initially tested were much cruder than the human eye. They pixelized (turned into pixels, that is points) what the video camera saw. The implant compared to the human eye’s natural abilities something like what the old dot matrix printers created in comparison to a computer laser printer. The blind person’s perception via the implants is somewhat cruder than actual sight. Experiments have found that the brain has a great deal of power in choosing how it interprets images, so that it is hoped that the plasticity of the visual system will allow blind people’s brain to adapt to what they are being shown over a period of time to get the maximum visual advantage. This also implies that victims of visual implants--which are of a more sophisticated technology will also have a natural tendency to rewire their brains to accommodate the new sensory inputs.
One of several groups of public researchers into Visual Neuroprosthetics (visual implants) is Richard A. Normann, with the Dept. of Bioengineering, John Moran Lab for Applied Vision and Neural Sciences, at the Univ. of Utah. In 1990, he spoke to people at the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics about visual implants. At that conference on cybernetics, there were already well thought out methods for creating silicon based electrode arrays. The John Hopkins University in Massachusetts is another research center into visual implants. MIT and Harvard have also been researching in the subject of visual implants. Advances in material available and micro-fabrication techniques has permitted the semiconductor manufacturer to create electrode arrays with 3-D architectures, which can then be implanted into the visual parts of a person.
HOW THEY WORK
In a true visual prosthetic, a video encoder (camera) transforms the visual world in front of a blind individual into electrical signals that are used to excite neurons at some point of the visual pathway. The video camera encoder will be a silicon retina that replaces some of the functions that the human retina performs, and then it makes what it sees into signal compatible with the neurons the encoder must stimulate. The signals from the encoder excite neurons either via a hard-wired percutaneous connection, or a telemetry link. "The stimulating electrodes must be implanted into visual pathway such that each electrode is able to excite only a small population of neurons in the vicinity of the electrode." (Normann, Richard. "Visual Neuroprosthetics Functional Vision for the Blind", in IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology, Jan-Feb. ’95, pg. 77) To improve the picture sent by the implants to the brain, electrodes the size of the neurons they intend to stimulate in the eye were developed. Kensall Wise at the University of Michigan created small high density electrode arrays out of silicon. In one model, the electrodes are .08 mm at their base, and taper to a sharpened tip. An array of hundreds of such electrodes can be implanted into cortical tissue about 1.5-2.0 mm below the cortical surface. This is not all of the design considerations involved, but it gives an idea of the direction that public research has gone in. A special pneumatic inserter that can shoot the arrays at high velocities to insert them into the cortical tissue was created by Patrick Rousche. This method provided limited cortical-based-map images. To further improve the picture, implants are being created that create a retinal map, rather than a cortical map. This can take advantage of the image forming properties of the human eye, and may give satisfactory images. At the current pace of public development, visual implants that restore sight are only a few years away from mass production. Meanwhile, the Network continues to create and use visual implants that are more sophisticated than what the public sector has been allowed to create. Bear in mind that these researchers use either foundation grant money or government grant money to operate. The Network is very careful about what technology is developed. Some excessively ambitious implant researchers (not visual, but other) have seen their work have a national security gag order thrown over them, and the research ends up muzzled from getting out to the public.
|
|
|
Post by Matrix on Jun 18, 2011 18:09:34 GMT -5
Ps. That came from "Deeper Insights"
|
|
|
Post by Matrix on Jun 18, 2011 17:51:13 GMT -5
Maybe some people simply don't feel comfortable to share their experiences. Okay, I can see that. Thank you! By the way I've found a link today on this forum that is of help "
BIO-CHIPS that "talk" to nerve cells. Some of the readers will have already heard of the bio-chips that talk to nerve cells. Stanford Research Inst. has been working on such bio-chips. Bear in mind, public research is generally a cover for what has already been discovered.
HOLOGRAPHIC OR H-INSERT-- There is one type which has been called a Holographic Insert or H-Implant. A holographic memory is created by this implant. This may or may not be the Nanobots which are capable of creating holographic images in the mind. Let’s discuss the nanobots.
HOLOGRAPHIC IMPLANTS VIA NANOTECHNOLOGY & NANOBOTS Nanotechnology is technology pertaining to very tiny robots and tiny computers that are in the range of nanometer-size (10 to 1,000 billionth of a meter). Nano means "one-billioneth". In other words, extremely microscopic, we are talking about robots & machines one-billionth of a meter large. The Scanning Tunneling Microscope (STM) makes it possible to see something the size of a single atom. The STM will also pick up atoms and move them. People who are interested in nano-technology have regular meetings in the Silicon Valley. A Johannesburg, South African company Nanoteq (recently taken over by the Amer. company Microchip Technology) was the company that created nanotechnology encoders (based on a non-linear logarithm that mixes transmission lines and changes codes frequently). Microchip Technology is putting these encoders into their series of microcontrollers which are EEPROM-based.
The encoders are called Keeloq hopping-code technology. They are good in protecting micro-wave, ELF, infrared and radio-wave transmissions. Microchip Corp. is creating a sub-company group called Secure Data Products to work with this type of technology. In other words, the ALEX system reported on in Vol. 2 is being miniaturized. Another Nanotechnology company is Nanosystems, which is working with the Jansen Pharmaceutica N.y. unit of Illuminati-controlled Johnson and Johnson. We know numerous companies like the two mentioned above, who are working on Nanotechnology. We also know that they are not going to tell us their trade secrets and what they have really developed. For instance, this author had a hearty laugh when he read The New York Times (11/19/96 pg. Cl) article "Feat of the minuscule: scientists make abacus with carbon molecules: invention at Swiss research laboratory may be a step toward building faster computers", because the article is patently disinformation! According to the article a Dr. James M. Gimzewski and colleagues discovered how to make tiny balls of 60 carbon-atoms each. They call these balls "Buckyballs". They can move these balls via what they call a "scanning tunneling device". A picture of the teeny-tiny 60-atom balls was shown in the article. So what did they do with this ability? They built an abacus (yeah sure! Come on guys!). If the reader understands computers--a computer at the most basic level is simply a base 2 number system. Anything that can consistently move or switch can be the basis for a computer. A computer is simply an enormous amount of on-off switches, where 0 can stand for off and 1 for on, etc.
The article states, "Scientists at Switzerland have invented an ultraminiature abacus in which spherical carbon molecules sliding along the microscopic copper groves act as the counting beads for performing arithmetic calculations." (So they are using it for arithmetic, yeah sure!) IBM reported that its scientists used the STM to move individual atoms so that they spelled "I-B-M" in atoms. If you believe that the ability to arrange individual atoms and tailor-build molecules was so that IBM scientists could spell IBM, then this book isn’t for you. A more recent NY Times article (2/2/97, p. E6) discusses how Xerox Corporation has created sensors the thickness of peach fuzz. These are called MEMS (micro-electomechanical systems). The article states, "MEMS are all about doing more with less, about being lean, mean, and next to invisible." The article is lean on facts. It does give a hint of the incredible power these little gadgets have when the writer launches into his propaganda tirade at the end of the article, "Paradoxically the fear that accompanies the fantasy of nanotechnology is not that the culture will be as stratified and fragmented as Victorian England, but that the new culture will be one that is unrecognizable to everyone alive today." That is true, this nano technology is taking us to the place that society will not be recognizable.
The age of the future is planned to be the age of robots--humans if they are to survive are to be robotic slaves for the illuminated elite. However, this is not paranoid fear as the NY Times writer implies, but it is the unfortunate reality humanity faces. Some people apparently are already experiencing it. One victim of mind-control, whose father is Military Intelligence and whose family is part of the Illuminati, claims that he has been subjected to tiny robots called nanobots. These nanobots have been featured on TV, where they have been billed as an asset for surgeons. Reportedly, these tiny robots can work off of 10-100 kilohertz of beamed power. They have coil-shaped antennas, 2 little six-pointed "wings" to attach and move themselves with. These tiny boron-carbon nanobots have all kinds of purposes. One use is for multitudes of these Nanobots to be placed into a single victim’s head, where they are programmed to migrate to certain programmed positions where they can suppress the optical signals to the brain and replace these signals with their own holographic images that can be externally transmitted to the nanobots or preprogrammed in. They are trying or have succeeded, depending upon who is talking about nanobots, in making self-replicating assemblers. In other words, they have built miniature robots that build other robots. (Sounds like something the Japanese would do.)
Nanobot researchers talk about how great it will be to have tiny robots that are smaller than a red blood cell circulating in our blood removing fat, bacteria, and viruses.
SOME SOURCES.
Recent articles on nanotechnolgy include:
Electronic Times (12/7/95),
Electronics Weekly (11/29/95),
Electronic Engineering Times (11/27/95),
the L.A. Times (11/11/94, 12/21/94, 2/7/96, 2/20/96),
the NY Times (4/30/94, 11/19/96, 2/2/97),
the Wall St. Journal (5/12/94, 1/9/96, 2/26/96).
Eric Drexler wrote Engines of Creation (Anchor Press/Doubleday, 1986), a book about nanotechnology.
"So it's possible that the holograms have been send and there's an update every single night between 2 and 4 am. Where there's a history with 3am. Parkinson, lyme, alzheimer, they all stand up for periods at 3am. I think the data wakes them up. Cause it's not 2:59 or 3:01 but exactly 3am. Microsoft does it's updates at 3am as well, don't know if it's related, but I've come to notice that.
|
|
|
Post by Matrix on Jun 18, 2011 15:47:55 GMT -5
Watching television? If someone told you you're funny, they were lying . Why ridicule someone?
|
|
|
Post by Matrix on Jun 12, 2011 6:00:19 GMT -5
Thank you
|
|
|
Post by Matrix on Jun 12, 2011 5:58:37 GMT -5
I'm sorry to hear you don't have your eyesight like you use to The whole thing is just so saddening. I've been observing my symptoms, based upon them I was just trying to help. All the best to you Fatin
|
|
|
Post by Matrix on Jun 11, 2011 19:32:20 GMT -5
Hi fatin, I have a problem with red also, after seeing a red jumper, say. My eyes see green, for abit, in the shape of how i saw the jumper. You know when u see the sun, and then u get dot flashers for awhile, its similar to that. My eyesight isn't as crash hot as it used to be... ;D try sunglasses Seriously would you bother to try and notice it?
|
|
|
Post by Matrix on Jun 11, 2011 19:29:18 GMT -5
LOL funny....
I don't know if it repairs all our unique DNA fact is we're all made up of the same.... so, point taken....
...a beautiful piece of music is welcomed, you either love or you don't. About the hallucination, well yes I would say so. But the thing I'm trying to find out if Smart Dust does sends data and not just receives it. I've read an article that information goes from A to B, but I think it does not just go one way.
Since I do not live in the states and am not accustomed with the English language, like you, it's challenging to read if you're serious or not, you see
And I have this morning yet again learned I rather feel good, than be right.
|
|
|
Post by Matrix on Jun 11, 2011 19:06:50 GMT -5
Are you making fun of me, cause I meant what I'd said. I notice the brain fog whenever the color red is in sight. I wouldn't make jokes about that.
|
|
|
Post by Matrix on Jun 11, 2011 18:33:35 GMT -5
Thank you Violet, for your help, you've been really kind to me.
Matrix
|
|
|
Post by Matrix on Jun 11, 2011 12:00:48 GMT -5
Hi Xiblanque, Try avoiding the color red. That might help Regards, Fatin
|
|
|
Post by Matrix on Jun 11, 2011 11:06:48 GMT -5
I live by myself and it was just as scary as it looked. I pray but this scares me.
|
|
|
Post by Matrix on Jun 11, 2011 11:02:36 GMT -5
More honesty. Never read anyone else talking about it. But I'm asking to see if people developed the same interest at 3am, that's why I'm asking.
Usually people are asleep at 3am, but I wasn't that night. To my big surprise someone actually caught it on tape, just found out a couple of days ago. Gladly, cause trying to example this to anyone is a challenge.
Matrix
|
|
|
Post by Matrix on Jun 11, 2011 10:24:01 GMT -5
Hi Violet,
I thank you for sharing this experience. Do you recall anything specific, ideas or any actions taken?
Regards, Matrix
|
|
|
Post by Matrix on Jun 11, 2011 5:54:22 GMT -5
Yes, you've been a great help, thank you for sharing that.
I do hope more people decide to responds...
Matrix
|
|
|
Post by Matrix on Jun 10, 2011 17:06:54 GMT -5
[quote author=itchin4answers board=offtopicserious thread=14874 Great to have you on board & sorry you have this darn disease. [/quote]
Thank you, same here!
|
|
|
Post by Matrix on Jun 10, 2011 17:04:48 GMT -5
Itchin,
Well what can I say, those wives might have been old but not that crazy. Do you still remember what you did when you woke up?
Matrix
|
|
|
Post by Matrix on Jun 10, 2011 16:00:19 GMT -5
Here's the thing, I've seen it being listed as one of the symptoms of lyme "patients". But people with parkinson and alzheimer have the same thing. It's peculiar that a disease can wake you up a any certain time.
|
|
|
Post by Matrix on Jun 10, 2011 15:57:48 GMT -5
Hi Everyone, Thanks for helping me play inspector gadget. Regards, Matrix
|
|