|
|
Post by kammy on Feb 3, 2010 3:31:16 GMT -5
Your picture also has a matching tuft above the front forelegs. Where as in collembola, the entire plate is colored and does not appear "rough" or "tufted". Additionally, in the collembola, the leg seperation from the head area is very defined where as in the flea, it is quite like the first forelegs are almost an extension from its head. As far as what is pictured in back. There is a defined structure within it. But what would your specimen look like if that structure was put underneath the posterior part instead of being viewed as an extension or tail? Then the back of the organism you are showing, would then look very similar to that of the cat flea I have pictured. While getting the sample from your skin, perhaps that back half was ripped partly off during the process. If that is indeed the case, then what the resulting organism looks like could be misleading?  Again, I am not discounting it, just an idea to consider. As far as an explanation as to why you have found it in a skin sample. All I can offer you is my own thinking. And this is where I am finding connections to the resulting parasites of many of us. Parasites being external as well as internal. Are you familar with the works of Dr. Hulda Clark? In her writings, and especially in the book, "The Cure for All Diseases", she enumerates many connections as to why today, we are finding all kinds of parasites not known to infest or infect man in the past. Fungii, secrete pheromones themselves too. It is part of what attracts insects such as fungus gnats, mites, fleas, fly's etc. They are attracted too and subsequently this tells them that the substrate is satisfactory to lay eggs in and of which the hatching larvae will have sufficient food to develop. The connection to some of us I believe in the homes, is the development of unchallenged mold growth within hidden boundaries, and the smell, is what initially attracts these. Living in this home, will then transfer those pheromones to everything within it as well, and in my thinking, to us as well. I believe the reason in which we are finding all these insects in places we shouldn't be is also due to the resulting biotoxin illness we develop in these environments. The havoc created by biotoxins and the shutting down of pathways, then opens us up to the production of ethyl alcohols and such that Dr. Hulda Clark refers to often. Those ethyl alcohols are by products of the toxins and the chemical reactions in our bodies to the biotoxins and the exposures to mold. Some of us have had issues with internal parasites as well. I belive the resulting creation of those alcohols that Dr. Hulda Clark refers to, by simply our bodies creating figthing mechanisms which includes the reactions caused by cytokienes, then provide an environment in which these organisms not commonly found in the human to exist. In other words, the toxic components of these alcohols and etc, allow what normally cannot or does not develop with or on the human body, to do so. Anywho, now you know why I will not discount anybody's observation of insects or parasites. Just an introduction to and an explanation of why I have posted what I have. Frito Well... it's very strange. I can tell you that the ER doctor understood very well that I WAS THE HOST of whatever these pieces of circular debris were that I had brought in and I was like a pepper shaker - there was 'debris' all over and around me, very evident of what was happening to me. This doctor was very concerned, confused and unsure of himself. He had to look up what medicine to give me for a flea infestation and was adamant about me following up with my GP (the shuffle, ha! like a GP would know more of what to do!), acting like my problem was more of what a GP should be handling and not the ER!  Ok, let's say for a minute that I had a flea (or two) in my environment and those were jumping on me too at the time my head was exploding like a mushroom sporing... and caused me to think that they were part of the other 'critters' that were attacking me. (I had no signs of fleas in my environment otherwise.) I have lots of photographs to take yet, and the way I'm doing it - photographing several pages in a row and then relying on my memory to remember which specimen I'm showing... well - maybe, I made a mistake in my identification that this specimen came out of my head, but, I don't think so - I haven't double checked yet? I'll have to go back and look at that page again with the microscope, I'll have to slow down and just photograph one page in the scrapbook at a time. If I did have a flea infestation, I'm sure there will be other evidence of it, this could have been an accidental capturing... I can't draw any real conclusions based on this one finding. Frito - it's very interesting that you mention that the "flea, it is quite like the first forelegs are almost an extension from its head" - which I noticed in this what I believe is the creation of the front forelegs that they are extending very close to the head of the entity?  I hadn't read Hulda Clark's writings on humans now being parasitized by 'others', and it makes sense. Your observations are probably on cue too. Yes, I believe the house I've been in for 10 years has always had fungus gnat issues. When I opened the basement door recently and commented on how the 'cobwebs' looked like fungus gnat webs to me - the previous owner, who grew up in that house said - 'they've always been like that'... Sick wood, sick houses, invisible mold spores - but, it should have a smell of some kind to let you know mold is present... pay attention to the odors. We've heard many state that the Morgellons fungus/mold smell has a distinct odor, a sweet sickly smell like no other - well yes, it's like nothing we've ever smelled before, isn't it? Larvae feces! I know that's what is happening under my skin - my chin had some 'grits' coming out of it in a half inch place... I've been putting all kinds of stuff on my chin lately, peppermint oil, etc., it's aggravating the larvae under the skin to where it's trying to get away - it's moving/tracking (are these the tracks people are referring to? the larvae make a tunnel track as they move along) across my chin to where I now have a two inch line of 'spheres' that are coming out. These larvae are probably all under my skin - everywhere... defecating fungus balls as they move along, geez! It's time to start on the anti-parasiticals again, I heard Dr. Savely say that with some people she has to give them Ivermectin, a lot of it - to get them well. |
|
|
|
Post by kammy on Feb 3, 2010 3:50:26 GMT -5
I have already shown that the fungus gnat larvae is defecating carbon-looking 'spheres', I even made a You-Tube movie of it in action. That these spheres look just like the spheres that Carnicom was showing us? I got off track by Carnicom saying that these spheres contained hemoglobin, that the expert in respirocytes said they looked like micelles to him, etc... and went into that avenue of research. I suppose I can understand why none of the 'experts' are not mentioning that we have insect larvae under our skin and especially that our 'specks' are partially larvae feces! How disgusting is this? How sick does this make us? I would think it's highly possible that the larvae are defecating hemoglobin because possibly they are partially eating/drinking our blood as they are going along? We need to look at the properties in larvae feces and see what this material is doing to us and those of us that are experiencing 'specks and spheres' coming out of our skin - I need to get over to Jo's site and see what she has to say on how to get rid of these larvae under our skin, let me find her link? www.morgellonsuk.org.uk/micromyiasis.htm |
|
|
|
Post by kammy on Feb 3, 2010 4:47:00 GMT -5
On 7/1/08 I had taped two of the black speck spheres to a business card to see if I could get a Veterinarian to confirm that these black specks were flea dirt or flea eggs? Dr. Suber in Atlanta looked at the card and could not be sure one way or another. I did not tell her they came out of my head but pretended like they came off my pet (which I didn't have any longer and had not been in my environment in more than a year) and was wondering if my pet had a flea issue?... I was surprised that a vet could not recognize flea debris one way or another - I was under the impression that they had to take some microbiology classes and should know?  Original Photo: my-stuff-dot-com.com/LB/BlackSpeckonPaper7108/02_01_54.JPEGWhat's damning about this photograph is that it shows that the fibers in the paper are interacting with the fungal spore and have 'married' each other even though no known water was present to cause this interaction, it shows the volatility of the spore. It indicates that there is something in paper that interacts strongly with the spore. That after almost 2 years this spore is probably still viable? |
|
|
|
Post by kammy on Feb 3, 2010 5:28:46 GMT -5
I just read where Carnicom has recently stated that the Morgellons pathogen is not known before. Well... I'm stating - it is partially known. The Morgellons pathogen is GM larvae frass and feces happening up under the skin. Can an adult insect defecate under our skin also? If collembola do not have a larvae stage and as they have been reported under the skin of Morgellons sufferers, and if these people produced 'spheres' from their skin, then we can also assume the adults of insects is also possible to be there.
That by the insects being genetically modified and possibly a few other factors - this has caused a shift in their predation. Insects that used to be non-parasitic to humans - now are capable of this and this insect 'feces' is at the core of Morgellons disease.
In laymen's terms - man has modified insects to where in their creation they are started with atoms of particles - which turn into goo - which then turns more solid - which forms all the known parts of the insect. This insect is not totally real until it reaches a certain point in its development, at that time, it most likely takes on the characteristics of the natural insect.
These formations into real insects are happening under our skin, introduced by... we're not sure yet how the eggs were initially planted? Morgellons sufferers can be dealing with many different pathogens at one time.
1. The GM organism is forming but not in a live state. We are dealing with the pathogens/toxins that make up the GM organism at all times.
2. When the organism transitions from non-real into real and starts the metabolic processes that the particular insect performs, ie. breathing, eating, defecating... the sufferer is dealing with those added pathogens that are contained especially in the feces of the insect.
3. If we do not get the larvae removed - they are turning into live insects under our skin. We are then dealing with the pathogens that a foreign invader, ectoskeleton, shell of the insect along with the above.
4. If the fully formed GM insect is in our intestinal tract, etc., it can do the damage that a real insect or parasite is known to do. In most cases the insects being found in Morgellons disease are not known to be parasites of humans, creating a whole new area of unknowns in the science of parasitology and that is why we are seeing our doctors' ignorance/misunderstanding of what is happening to us.
5. There is a symbiosis between the fungal aspect that the insect defecates and the insect itself, in that the fungal spore that the insect defecates creates food, shelter, a further way for the life cycle to reproduce itself.
6. The reason the fibers and our fungus cannot be identified is because they have been mostly created using the magic in the art of genetically modifying an insect, whatever chemicals/properties the molecular entomologist used in creating a GM organism are also at the heart of Morgellons disease.
|
|
|
|
Post by kammy on Feb 3, 2010 6:32:59 GMT -5
Genetically Modified Organism en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetically_modified_organism"A genetically modified organism (GMO) or genetically engineered organism (GEO) is an organism whose genetic material has been altered using genetic engineering techniques. These techniques, generally known as recombinant DNA technology, use DNA molecules from different sources, which are combined into one molecule to create a new set of genes. This DNA is then transferred into an organism, giving it modified or novel genes. Transgenic organisms, a subset of GMOs, are organisms which have inserted DNA that originated in a different species. Some GMOs contain no DNA from other species and are therefore not transgenic but cisgenic. Production Further information: Horizontal Gene Transfer and Transformation Genetic modification involves the insertion or deletion of genes. When genes are inserted, they usually come from a different species, which is a form of horizontal gene transfer. In nature this can occur when exogenous DNA penetrates the cell membrane for any reason. To do this artificially may require attaching the genes to a virus or just physically inserting the extra DNA into the nucleus of the intended host with a very small syringe, or with very small particles fired from a gene gun.[1] However, other methods exploit natural forms of gene transfer, such as the ability of Agrobacterium to transfer genetic material to plants,[2] or the ability of lentiviruses to transfer genes to animal cells.[3]" |
|
|
|
Post by kammy on Feb 3, 2010 6:36:00 GMT -5
Recombinant DNA en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombinant_DNA"Recombinant DNA is a form of DNA that does not exist naturally, which is created by combining DNA sequences that would not normally occur together.[1] In terms of genetic modification, recombinant DNA (rDNA) is introduced through the addition of relevant DNA into an existing organismal DNA, such as the plasmids of bacteria, to code for or alter different traits for a specific purpose, such as antibiotic resistance.[1] It differs from genetic recombination, in that it does not occur through processes within the cell, but is engineered.[1] A recombinant protein is a protein that is derived from recombinant DNA.[2]" |
|
|
|
Post by jeany on Feb 3, 2010 6:36:44 GMT -5
Is it the chitin what makes them so hard to remove? Insect Chitinases: Molecular Biology and Potential Use as Biopesticideswww.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6T79-3SJN77Y-1&_user=10&_coverDate=11%2F30%2F1998&_rdoc=1&_fmt=high&_orig=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_searchStrId=1191728625&_rerunOrigin=google&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=9f31d8fd781099311301ccbcec550d50Chitin, an insoluble structural polysaccharide that occurs in the exoskeletal and gut linings of insects, is a metabolic target of selective pest control agents. Most recently, we have been developing chitinase for use as a biopesticide to control insect and also fungal pests.
Chitinases have been isolated from the tobacco hornworm, Manduca sexta,* look Kammy, this one has the horns, just like the one I plucked from your ear!  A transformed entomopathogenic virus that produces the enzyme displayed enhanced insecticidal activity. Chitinase also potentiated the efficacy of the toxin from the microbial insecticide, Bacillus thuringiensis. * what?..entomopathogenic virus?..producing enzymes?..That's what I believe is happening, Kammy. The larvae are producing an enzyme in their guts and release the feces containing not only a fungus for bio control but also an enzyme, as natural fertilizer! The virus that has been added has the insecticidal affect. So..it's..three-in-one..virus, fungus and a fertilizer!..a self-promoter!!.. ....adding BT into the mix makes it even more efficient. B. thurigiensis-based insecticides are often applied as liquid sprays on crop plants, where the insecticide must be ingested to be effective. It is thought that the solubilized toxins form pores in the midgut epithelium of susceptible larvae. Recent research has suggested that the midgut bacteria of susceptible larvae are required for B. thuringiensis insecticidal activity. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bacillus_thuringiensis**HERE it is!! The larvae defecating the bio control agents! www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc217.htm* Kammy, look at this picture. Doesn't the above 'chain' look similar with the chain we've seen in the larvae....the spinal cord?  californiaagriculture.ucanr.org/landingpage.cfm?article=ca.v052n06p14&fulltext=yesJeany |
|
|
|
Post by jeany on Feb 3, 2010 6:46:43 GMT -5
In addition to the parasporal body toxins, B.t. kurstaki and many Bts produce several other components that improve the efficacy of the Cry proteins, increasing its insect spectrum, and impeding resistance. These include the antibiotic zwittermicin, which increases the toxicity of Cry proteins by an unknown mechanism, and the spore. The spore has its greatest effect against insects with moderate or low sensitivity to the Cry toxins, such as larvae of gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar), the diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella) and the beet armyworm (Spodoptera exigua). In larvae of these species, after an initial intoxication resulting from activation of the Cry toxins in the midgut, the spore germinates and produces enzymes (phospholipases and proteases).
These contribute to the lysis of gut cells by degrading cell membranes.californiaagriculture.ucanr.org/landingpage.cfm?article=ca.v052n06p14&fulltext=yes |
|
|
|
Post by kammy on Feb 3, 2010 6:48:18 GMT -5
Is it the chitin what makes them so hard to remove? Insect Chitinases: Molecular Biology and Potential Use as Biopesticideswww.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6T79-3SJN77Y-1&_user=10&_coverDate=11%2F30%2F1998&_rdoc=1&_fmt=high&_orig=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_searchStrId=1191728625&_rerunOrigin=google&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=9f31d8fd781099311301ccbcec550d50Chitin, an insoluble structural polysaccharide that occurs in the exoskeletal and gut linings of insects, is a metabolic target of selective pest control agents. Most recently, we have been developing chitinase for use as a biopesticide to control insect and also fungal pests.
Chitinases have been isolated from the tobacco hornworm, Manduca sexta,* look Kammy, this one has the horns, just like the one I plucked from your ear! A transformed entomopathogenic virus that produces the enzyme displayed enhanced insecticidal activity. Chitinase also potentiated the efficacy of the toxin from the microbial insecticide, Bacillus thuringiensis. * what?..entomopathogenic virus?..producing enzymes?..That's what I believe is happening, Kammy. The larvae are producing an enzyme in their guts and release the feces containing not only a fungus for bio control but also an enzyme, as natural fertilizer! The virus that has been added has the insecticidal affect. So..it's..three-in-one..virus, fungus and a fertilizer!..a self-promoter!!.. ....adding BT into the mix makes it even more efficient. B. thurigiensis-based insecticides are often applied as liquid sprays on crop plants, where the insecticide must be ingested to be effective. It is thought that the solubilized toxins form pores in the midgut epithelium of susceptible larvae. Recent research has suggested that the midgut bacteria of susceptible larvae are required for B. thuringiensis insecticidal activity. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bacillus_thuringiensis**HERE it is!! The larvae defecating the bio control agents!www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc217.htm* Kammy, look at this picture. Doesn't the above 'chain' look similar with the chain we've seen in the larvae....the spinal cord? californiaagriculture.ucanr.org/landingpage.cfm?article=ca.v052n06p14&fulltext=yesJeany Oh, I'm a tobacco hornworm Morgie?, that I can believe... how'd that get in my ear? I asked Jo to come in to look at the photo of the 'horned worm' that I posted last night, let's hope she responds? I believe I have a photo of the 'Cry2A' crystal - it is what is known as our 'glitter'. Here's a piece of red glitter that appeared after me putting handwipe alcohol and GSE on my face last August:  (That 'Cry11A' looks suspicious, too.) That 'chain' spinal cord looks just like what I described last night. That's it, Jeany! That photo of the caterpillar/larvae defecating is what I believe is happening under my skin!! WTG! |
|
|
|
Post by jeany on Feb 3, 2010 6:51:30 GMT -5
 How do Cry toxins work? Even though Cry toxins have been extensively used commercially, the specifics of their mode of action are still controversial. This multi-step toxicity process (see Figure below) includes ingestion of the Cry protein by a susceptible insect, solubilization, and procesing from a protoxin to an activated toxin core in the insect digestive fluid. The toxin core travels across the peritrophic matrix and binds to specific receptors called cadherins on the brush border membrane of the gut cells. Toxin binding to cadherin proteins results in activation of an oncotic cell death pathway and/or formation of toxin oligomers that bind to GPI-anchored proteins and concentrate on regions of the cell membrane called lipid rafts. Accumulation of toxin oligomers results in toxin insertion in the membrane, pore formation, osmotic cell shock, and ultimately insect death. Whether oncosis, pore formation and/or both mechanisms are ultimately responsible for enterocyte death is still controversial. web.utk.edu/~jurat/Btresearchtable.html |
|
|
|
Post by kammy on Feb 3, 2010 7:32:30 GMT -5
How do Cry toxins work? Even though Cry toxins have been extensively used commercially, the specifics of their mode of action are still controversial. This multi-step toxicity process (see Figure below) includes ingestion of the Cry protein by a susceptible insect, solubilization, and procesing from a protoxin to an activated toxin core in the insect digestive fluid. The toxin core travels across the peritrophic matrix and binds to specific receptors called cadherins on the brush border membrane of the gut cells. Toxin binding to cadherin proteins results in activation of an oncotic cell death pathway and/or formation of toxin oligomers that bind to GPI-anchored proteins and concentrate on regions of the cell membrane called lipid rafts. Accumulation of toxin oligomers results in toxin insertion in the membrane, pore formation, osmotic cell shock, and ultimately insect death. Whether oncosis, pore formation and/or both mechanisms are ultimately responsible for enterocyte death is still controversial. web.utk.edu/~jurat/Btresearchtable.htmlI love this quote above "Whether oncosis, pore formation and/or both mechanisms are ultimately responsible for enterocyte death is still controversial."  You think that's what the Army is doing - trying to figure out how to kill the GM magic and which one of these is true? Geez, how could they let something get inside of us that they don't know how to kill exactly or how it dies? Your photo shows the larvae 'pooping' out a BT toxin crystal? Well... let's break the pathogens down into two categories to see what we're fighting, to see how to stop it?... we can't wait on them, they could be debating a while? 1. The fungal spore - the 'poop' 2. The chemistry that creates the insect So, we can assume that the spore contains the BT toxins and also the BT toxins are involved in the creation of the insect? We need to see how to eliminate, stop the BT processes? |
|
|
|
Post by kammy on Feb 3, 2010 7:38:26 GMT -5
In the meantime:
Jeany read an article somewhere about ridding parasites and other benefits which entails taking a clove of garlic, making slits in it and soaking it in olive oil and then inserting it up our aspes... I have done this two days in a row now and I think it is helping?... I've increased the garlic supplements.
And, Jeany found a natural product from bees called propolis which is supposed to deactive BIOWARFARE chemistry... she'll tell you more about it... we've ordered some.
|
|
|
|
Post by fritolay66 on Feb 3, 2010 8:03:18 GMT -5
Kammy,
You have done a lot of posting since yesterday, and I apologize for the lack of response or participation, but I worked late last night. I do have some responses, and will get back here in an hour or so.
Jeany,
Also apologize for not following up with your headaches, and I also have responses. I would also like to know specifically how the Bt interacts with us, humans and that part interests me.
Apologies,
Frito
|
|
|
|
Post by kammy on Feb 3, 2010 8:31:46 GMT -5
We don't know yet, Frito - how the BT comes into play exactly other than what we've learned above. I knew we would eventually need a "BT" thread to look at it closer... it's pretty much a given that it's involved and 'BS' too - we just didn't realize it's major role in the scheme of things and really no evidence of its existence until now.
You understand fungi pretty well... I have a bunch of questions there. I'm thinking that we all have the same 'programmed poop' happening whether or not it's evident (producing lesions with specks?)... maybe, with some of us - our bodies are capable of carrying it away and with others it isn't? Some of us have more larval involvement than others? I wonder if it's possible that we don't have any, what do you think?
I believe there is more than one sphere involved... and now we can recognize what the fungal spore is doing that the insect is defecating and separate it from the other or others? Thoughts anyone and feel to jump in with input where ever...?
|
|
|
|
Post by kammy on Feb 3, 2010 9:16:57 GMT -5
Is it the chitin what makes them so hard to remove? Jeany Didn't we look at chitanase supplements to dissolve the chitin a long time ago... is it time to dig out the chitanse? Am I remembering correctly? |
|
|
|
Post by kammy on Feb 3, 2010 9:22:04 GMT -5
All About Tomato and Tobacco Hornworms www.allaboutworms.com/tomato-and-tobacco-hornworms"Tomato and tobacco hornworms are two of natures most popular types of hornworms. Their scientific names are Manduca quinquemaculata (tomato hornworm) and Manduca Sexta (tobacco hornworm). While tomato and tobacco hornworms are not considered harmful to humans, they are extremely harmful to plants, vegetables, and landscaping. Tomato and tobacco hornworms appetites are extremely healthy, so they will nosh on your tomatoes, leaves, and fruits for hours and hours on end if you allow them to. In addition to tomatoes, tobacco and tomato hornworms are also attracted to eggplant, potato, and pepper. Tomato and tobacco hornworms are typically 3 to 5 inches long and they have a large horn on their rear ends. This horn may look like it can do plenty of damage, but its actually pretty harmless. The tobacco hornworm has a red horn on its rear end and the tomato hornworm sports a black horn. If you have ever suspected that you have been bitten by a tomato or tobacco hornworm, chances are it wasn’t a hornworm that bit you. A tomato or tobacco hornworm (or any hornworm or insect for that matter) will do whatever it can to protect itself, especially if you handle it for too long. However, it doesn’t defend itself by biting. A hornworm will spit out the contents of its stomach, it will wiggle and thrash about, and it may even wrap itself around your finger, but it does not have the capability to sting or pierce the skin. It is important to keep in mind, however, that the hornworms wrap can be quite uncomfortable, so it’s best not to handle them for too long." It's says not to play with them for too long Jeany, well that's ok, they turn into 'glass ice' in 15 minutes anyway! If it can't bite, how did it and all its children get in my ear? |
|
|
|
Post by fritolay66 on Feb 3, 2010 9:23:56 GMT -5
There sure has been a lot of "BS" lately. But I am not interested in that! ;D
Kammy, I am going to try to explain my stance as clear as I can so no misunderstandings take place here. My stance comes only from what I have experienced and also those in which have contacted me with the same observations. It was extremely difficult for me to determine the difference between the active bugs and that of Morgellons when I suffered both. In fact, it took some convincing and quite a bit of time and effort on my part to in fact, confirm in my own case, that I was no longer attracting and hosting bugs. Mites were our problem. I went through four different mite infestations over the course of two years. It was absolutely horrendous.
The spheres in which I have noticed in my case only, are what I associate with Morgellons. All bugs defecate in some sphere form and those I am not interested in researching. I know that from my own personal experience, it was quite difficult for me to determine between the two when they both were occuring. I can only say that, now, since that part of this has been over, only then have I been able to make some observations. Since that part is over, or should I say, has not recurred as of yet, I do not believe, atleast in my case, that bugs are the main issue. If they were, I would have been cured a year ago. So in my case only, I believe the occurence of the infestations are secondary. Of course they do the body and the mind no good at all and most definately create more problems, I still believe they are secondary. I do not have the gall to speak for everyone, but if this is indeed somewhat acurate in my case, then this could perhaps be the case for others. My observations are just that. It may apply to some or none, but I can only relay what I have been through and just perhaps it may be helpful to someone else. So when I say I am not interested in the bugs or the BS, its not to be judgemental or to be a denialist. I went through bugs for two years. I know that phase exists and don't doubt its occrence in anyone. And since that phase has not recurred, I have to ask, atleast in my own case, what has created or contributed to the environment or my own person, in which allowed these things to take residence in my body and on my skin. And in that context, GMO's interest me greatly. As well as biotoxins, mold occurence in the home, chemical processes in the body, yadi ya.
Now what I find interesting in GMO's is the concern by those scientists that I referred to in some of my previous posts. That letter, of which I cannot find at this time, had details on what those concerns were and from memory I cannot name the specific concerns. But to summarize, what they were concerned about was the ability of the GMO's to laterally transfer genetic material. But, and this is my own opinion, and something I am quite interested in following at a later point, my concern is that the effects that these GMO's have directly on the soil or the agriculture or the bugs, may be having the same effects on us. If it does contribute to a system of toxicity, then again, we are coming up with biotoxins and the havoc they create within the human body.
I certainly won't knock anyone, whom is interested in bugs and what they defecate. If that is a course you need to pursue, but at this time, I personally am not. But what I did find interesting is the diagrams and information of what is happening in the bug and the results of that. Now that goes along with what I am suspecting at this time. It may be a wrong course to follow, I don't know, but one that I will eventually.
I am personally not an Ivermectin fan, and I took boat loads of it for quite awhile. It was not helpful to me, or my son. I have not touched pesticides or those dewormers for ages. All I can offer here, is that I am not a walking lesion anymore, so not using those has not hurt either my son or I in anyway. I cannot say the same for us taking them. Toni, has some great information on why Ivermectin could give the impression it is doing something, but really not helpful in the end. Perhaps she will post that information again for everyone.
I hope you understand that I understand and am not being .....well, you know.
Frito
|
|
|
|
Post by kammy on Feb 3, 2010 9:24:58 GMT -5
Now, we're getting somewhere... I didn't read far enough...
"Another issue with handling tomato and tobacco hornworms for too long has to do with parasite infestations. While the hornworm may be infected by a number of parasites, the most common is the braconid wasp. The larva hatch on the hornworm and it feeds on the hornworms insides until the wasp is ready to hatch. The cocoons are quite visible to the naked eye and they look like raised white bumps on the hornworms body. It’s probably not a good idea to handle a hornworm that shows signs of a parasite infestation, but leaving it in your garden can be a good thing. Once the wasps emerge from their cocoons, they will kill the hornworm host then seek out other hornworms to infest.
If you have a small garden and if you don’t notice white protrusions on any tomato or tobacco hornworms that you may see, it is ok to quickly handpick the hornworms from your garden. This is considered an effective method of hornworm control in small gardens. Another effective method of controlling tomato and tobacco hornworms in your garden is by using insecticides."
|
|
|
|
Post by jeany on Feb 3, 2010 9:25:04 GMT -5
In the meantime: Jeany read an article somewhere about ridding parasites and other benefits which entails taking a clove of garlic, making slits in it and soaking it in olive oil and then inserting it up our aspes... I have done this two days in a row now and I think it is helping?... I've increased the garlic supplements. And, Jeany found a natural product from bees called propolis which is supposed to deactive BIOWARFARE chemistry... she'll tell you more about it... we've ordered some. Yes, it was a German site about how to rid fungal and parasite infections naturally with garlic as it has strong antifungal and antiparasitical effects. You should do this before bedtime, by inserting the garlic clove, previously soaked with olive oil, in to the rectum. |
|
|
|
Post by fritolay66 on Feb 3, 2010 9:36:48 GMT -5
At this point in time, I am not interested or considering sticking anything up my asp, although I am sure I could get a few suggestions from others.....  Frito |
|
Again, I am not discounting it, just an idea to consider.
You think that's what the Army is doing - trying to figure out how to kill the GM magic and which one of these is true? Geez, how could they let something get inside of us that they don't know how to kill exactly or how it dies?
