|
Post by elizabeth67 on Apr 22, 2012 8:50:17 GMT -5
This is so heartbreaking....
|
|
|
Post by elizabeth67 on Apr 21, 2012 14:39:10 GMT -5
i ) Morgellons sucks.
|
|
|
Post by elizabeth67 on Mar 26, 2012 15:03:17 GMT -5
Hi Moe.
They closed the website after CDC's research came out. No one knows why.
|
|
|
Post by elizabeth67 on Mar 24, 2012 12:34:32 GMT -5
Great info, Homeworld. Shared both on Facebook.
|
|
|
Post by elizabeth67 on Mar 21, 2012 10:25:13 GMT -5
I think/ hope change is on the way, tho it is still a long road. Senators finally start to understand that GMO's and chemicals are on their ( and loved ones) plate too....
|
|
|
Post by elizabeth67 on Mar 21, 2012 3:23:09 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by elizabeth67 on Mar 17, 2012 17:21:40 GMT -5
Thanks Toni, your words mean a lot to me. The tight chest feeling worries me sometimes and I was wondering if the implants could be a part of this. But then again, sufferers without breast implants also experience this feeling. I better stop reading scientific literature for a while ;D
|
|
|
Post by elizabeth67 on Mar 17, 2012 15:37:09 GMT -5
tinyurl.com/78ptv59Troubles cloud over Monsanto Company’s (NYSE:MON - News) European operations, as the French government expressed its intention to continue its ban on the genetically modified (:GM) corn crops in 2012. Despite a ruling from France's top administrative court--ordering the lifting of the ban in November 2011-- France intended to maintain its ban on the domestic cultivation of genetically-modified corn MON810 in 2012 on strong environmental issues. Keeping up with this intent, Environment Ministry of France has reportedly asked EU—for suspension of Monsanto GM corn approval for 2012, of late. Since February 2008, the use of U.S. agricultural-biotech company Monsanto Co.'s MON810 corn variety has been banned by the French government on the grounds of health and environmental risks.
|
|
|
Post by elizabeth67 on Mar 17, 2012 13:04:00 GMT -5
Me too. They should have an open mind for every suggestion, but perhaps something or someone ( "they") are holding them back. There is so much crap going on in the world that our governments are trying to hush up..... There is some movement in the Netherlands about all kinds of medical devices. ( implants, injectables, artificial joints etc.) Two days ago I asked my doctor for a referral to check my breast implants. He refused because they still look intact. Without his referral my insurence won't pay for research and I don't have money to pay for it myself. I am worried sick, because there is bisphenol a in dental adhesives. Bisphenol a softens hard plastics. It makes hard pvc so soft and weak that they can make raincoats from it. What if the adhesive/bpa softens the packages from my implants?? It is so frustrating and scary that doctors can be so ignorant.... I wish I knew ten years ago what I know now about all these materials and how they can interact with eachother. I wish I just accepted myself the way I was.....
|
|
|
Post by elizabeth67 on Mar 17, 2012 10:34:33 GMT -5
Hi Violet.
I emailed my dental story and info some time ago to them. They could not see my point. I am for sure that they are doing the best they can to help sorting M out, but in my case they gave me the feeling that I was talking to one of my doctors/dentist. I'm sorry, because I don't want to say bad things about the CHF, or other researchers, but this is how I feel.
|
|
|
Post by elizabeth67 on Mar 17, 2012 4:58:18 GMT -5
Hi Lynn. All the dentist that I've seen are ignoring me and my pictures Two weeks ago I send a cd rom/my research to a dental school after asking their permission to send it. Some doctor responded to it. He was impressed with all the info and pic. but he said that his knowledge about material adverse reaction was not big enough to give me answers. He said that I should visit Acta ( another dental school, they are world leaders in material science!!!) I've already been there in 2008. They said that it was impossible that the adhesive caused my problems, because dentist don't apply this material with a syringe.....In other words, I am a lyer??? This is a major hush up......and they all are covering up mistakes/ accidents to avoid lawsuits. All these bio materials that are used in the past 50 years are all crap and can make people very sick. Morgellons is man made.
|
|
|
Post by elizabeth67 on Mar 16, 2012 16:07:26 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by elizabeth67 on Mar 16, 2012 15:48:08 GMT -5
Hi Tony, and nice to meet you. In 2008 I've send some fibers to Intertek Polychem. They did a FTIR but the outcome was not very clear. It said that it was a polymer, could be artificial ( polyamide) or natural ( polypeptide) They advised me to run a mass spec. but this is to expensive for me ( 700 euro for 1 fiber ) I am for sure that my fibers are artificial. ( dental monomer became polymer) wp.me/s1tqIo-2085 ( link to infra red spectra, click to enlarge ) wp.me/p1tqIo-vq ( fibers that came from my fillings _ wp.me/p1tqIo-uh ( fiber from neck / extracted wisdom tooth) wp.me/p1tqIo-w3 ( fibers from gums / piece of composite came out of my gums 4 years after fillings ) wp.me/p1tqIo-wY ( piece of composite came from filling, next day a large fluf came out of my scalp ) wp.me/s1tqIo-31 ( my dental adventure written in Dutch but all the scientific literature is in English/ lots of pics )
|
|
|
Post by elizabeth67 on Mar 9, 2012 16:00:50 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by elizabeth67 on Mar 8, 2012 14:37:26 GMT -5
Hi Lynn.
Some of the literature is abracadabra to m too. But it is a good thing that they are trying to get a clear(er) picture/ recognize nanotoxicity.
|
|
|
Post by elizabeth67 on Mar 7, 2012 6:18:57 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by elizabeth67 on Mar 7, 2012 5:53:41 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by elizabeth67 on Feb 29, 2012 13:20:36 GMT -5
Wow, Glenn. I'm happy I live in the Netherlands ;D
|
|
|
Post by elizabeth67 on Feb 29, 2012 13:19:27 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by elizabeth67 on Feb 23, 2012 4:43:14 GMT -5
Exactly. I can not believe that they don't know. Too late for that, the one who started this is dead. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poly(methyl_methacrylate)History The first acrylic acid was created in 1843. Methacrylic acid, derived from acrylic acid, was formulated in 1865. The reaction between methacrylic acid and methanol results in the ester methyl methacrylate. The German chemists Fittig and Paul discovered in 1877 the polymerization process that turns methyl methacrylate into polymethyl methacrylate. In 1933 the German chemist Otto Röhm patented and registered the brand name PLEXIGLAS. In 1936 the first commercially viable production of acrylic safety glass began. During World War II acrylic glass was used for submarine periscopes, windshields, canopies, and gun turrets for airplanes.
|
|